bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Legislative Council president Tsang Yok-sing has promised to 'exchange views' with lawmakers on his unprecedented decision to block an attempt to filibuster a controversial by-election law.
In a written explanatory ruling yesterday, Tsang defended his move to halt last Thursday's debate on the bill restricting the right of lawmakers who resign midterm to stand in by-elections. 
He had invoked Article 92 of Legco's rules of procedure, which empower the president to decide on matters not covered by the rules.
Tsang said his decision was in line with the Basic Law and Legco's rules, which he said empowered the president to chair meetings 'in a manner which ensures the efficient conduct of business and is also consistent with the general principles of protecting members' rights to speak'.
But he admitted: 'There is definitely room for improvement in the way I have consulted members on the best way forward in dealing with matters not provided for in the rules of procedure.'
He plans to discuss the issue with lawmakers at a committee meeting.
Tsang said he had sought advice from Legco's secretariat and legal adviser on halting the filibuster led by radical pan-democrats. But he could not cite any direct precedent to his move from legislatures elsewhere in the world. 
He quoted an opinion he had sought from Malcolm Jack, a former clerk to Britain's House of Commons, who said because Legco's rules did not cover filibustering, the decision should rest with the body's president.
Tsang had closed last week's 33-hour debate after a private meeting with 30 of the 60 lawmakers. He said yesterday that 'no objection [to the decision] was heard at the meeting'. But pan-democrat lawmakers said yesterday that they had objected.
 The High Court has rejected a legal challenge to Tsang's decision. 




Legco chief to explain filibuster tactic