Advertisement
Advertisement

Vehicles the problem, not 'jaywalkers'

You headline a recent letter 'Lazy jaywalkers putting themselves at risk' (South China Morning Post, August 25). However, pedestrians crossing the road risk only their own lives. Those in control of lethal machinery - car, bus and truck drivers - constantly put the lives of others at risk. Motor vehicles kill hundreds and maim thousands in Hong Kong annually and the cause is not 'jaywalking' but speeding and dangerous driving.

Only one family in seven owns a car in Hong Kong. But our environment is increasingly dominated by this small minority. Pedestrians resent bullying car, bus, truck and taxi drivers routinely going too fast, turning aggressively into walkers' paths when crossing at sideroads, spouting fumes from idling engines and other abuses. Roadside barriers are designed to make those on foot walk even further so that drivers can be given greater opportunity to go faster.

Most pedestrians wait surprisingly patiently on inadequate overcrowded pavements subjected to stress, noise, heat, and polluting stink from motor vehicles. At major crossing points, thousands of pedestrians per hour are subjected to this treatment while lights give priority to only a few hundred vehicles, mostly single-occupant private cars and taxis. No wonder some pedestrians decide to cross the road at their own personal risk rather than accept such discriminatory treatment.

Use of expressions like 'jaywalker' relieves drivers of their primary duty of care towards more vulnerable road-users.

Meanwhile, advertisements drool over ever-faster, higher-powered cars. The environment deteriorates as car numbers are set to double within a few years. Traffic enforcement is token only, with numbers of tickets/prosecutions very small compared to all the offences routinely taking place.

European experience shows road casualties are dramatically reduced by reduced tolerance of speeding, lowering speed limits in some areas to 30km/h etc. Benefits are a less hostile, safer, healthier environment, more people walking and cycling, fewer vehicles and reduced congestion.

However, government departments and the SAR's 'environmentalist' groups are so stuck in car-centred attitudes that such ideas seem still anathema here.

NAME AND ADDRESS SUPPLIED

Post