Advertisement
Advertisement

Spy trial puts Beijing in the dock of public opinion

Sixteen months after he was arrested for allegedly spying for Taiwan, Hong Kong journalist Ching Cheong has finally been put on trial. The development is a relief to his family and friends, not so much because he is likely to be found innocent and released but because they will finally know for how long he will have to stay behind bars. Such is the reality of the mainland's highhanded way of dealing with politically sensitive cases that one can only hope that he will get a light sentence.

Indeed, judging from the way the authorities have handled the case since his arrest in April last year, it is a foregone conclusion that the chief China reporter for the Singapore paper, The Straits Times, will be convicted and sentenced to jail. As with previous spying cases, Beijing has released little information on Ching's alleged crimes. And what it has released - that he had been spying for Taiwan's National Security Bureau by collecting secret political, economic and military information in return for payments of millions of Hong Kong dollars - defies belief.

The charges against Ching are not convincing for two reasons. The mainland has a very narrow view of what constitutes state secrets, from the days when the underground communist party was engaged in a deadly struggle for power. Much of the data that Beijing considers classified information is not regarded as sensitive in jurisdictions where access to information is a sign of good government. Ching's credentials as a patriot dates back to his student days. His close friends will need to see concrete evidence of his alleged crimes to accept that he had done anything to hurt the interests of a motherland he loves so much.

In apprehending Ching and laying those heinous charges against him, Beijing has put itself in the dock in the court of public opinion. So far, what the world has seen is not a pretty sight. Ching has been detained for an inordinately long time and barred from meeting even his family. He has been given access to lawyers, but they have not been given much time to prepare his defence. The court's proceedings are being held behind closed doors, allowing no public monitoring of whether they are fair.

The treatment Ching has received is not unlike that meted out to other journalists trapped by the mainland's treacherous information landmines. They include New York Times researcher Zhao Yan , who was charged with leaking state secrets for allegedly informing the newspaper of the decision by former president Jiang Zemin to step down as chairman of the Central Military Commission. Zhao was tried in June, but a verdict has yet to be handed down.

The world awaits a full account of the cases of Ching and Zhao. The mainland's claim to respect human rights will remain a hollow slogan as long as it keeps arresting journalists on dubious charges and putting them through secret trials.

Post