bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

helpersCheckIsPostiesArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

moreOnThisArticles

urlAlias

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

sponsorType

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

additionalInfoBoxes

quizIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Nora Tong

Will Clem

Employers call for clarity on language exam levels ahead of HKCEE results today

Better communication is needed over the Hong Kong Certificate of Education Examination's new language grading system, employers' representatives say.

Speaking ahead of the release of  HKCEE results today, they said that although there would be benefits to the system,  it was confusing.

Secretary-general of the  Examinations and Assessment Authority, Peter Hill,  admitted recently that it would 'take years' to explain the implications of the new grades.

Eddie Ng Hak-kim, a council member of the Institute of Human Resource Management, said the system would give employers a better grasp of an applicant's abilities.

'Under the old system an A indicated good performance, but employers knew nothing beyond that. We didn't know what he or she was good at,' he said.

The new system attaches detailed descriptions to different grades explaining what it meant to obtain a certain mark, making it easier for employers to measure competencies.

But Mr Ng said the exams authority had failed to communicate with employers effectively over it. Seminars explaining the changes should have been organised earlier.

A spokesman for the  Small and Medium Enterprises General Association described the new system as  confusing.

'We need to know whether Level 1 is the same as getting an E or whether Level 5 is the equivalent of an A,' he said. 'It's not clear.'

Louis Pong Wai-yan, executive director of the Employers' Federation,  said that while the system would be 'beneficial in the long run', the  authority should communicate better with employers on  what it meant to achieve a certain level.

A spokeswoman for the Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation  said job applicants would be expected to have Level 2 in English, one below the level set by the exams authority as the basic requirement for a clerk.

She said changes in the grading system would have little impact on the bank's recruitment process. 'We don't just look at grades,' she said.

A Cathay Pacific spokesman said the company was looking into the changes to the grading system, but had not yet formed an opinion.

Dr Hill said recently  it was likely there would be 'some initial hiccups' caused by the change in the language grading system.

He said that while he believed 'most of those who really need to know will very quickly come up to speed', he conceded it was unlikely everyone understood the implications. 'We are very aware that however many thousands of pamphlets we give out and however many articles there are in newspapers, there is still more to be done. It will take years.'

Dr Hill said that while all the big employer groups knew this information, small employers might not. 'There are some segments of the population who will go to their deathbeds  still remembering the system as it was when they were at school,' he said.



Confusion over new grading system