The separate mechanisms used to screen torture and refugee claimants in Hong Kong should be combined to prevent abuse of the system and speed up processing of asylum seekers, the United Nations' refugee agency says.
The two mechanisms are the key reason why asylum seekers in Hong Kong need to wait a long time - usually three to five years - to be screened.
Although the government admits that torture and refugee claims often overlap - 44 per cent of 6,657 torture claimants since 2005 have also lodged refugee claims - it refuses to handle these claims.
This is because the city is not a signatory to the UN's Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees. Instead, refugee claimants apply to the local office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees. However, Hong Kong has been a signatory to the UN Convention Against Torture since 1992, and it cannot expel, return or extradite a person to another state where there are substantial grounds for believing that the person would be in danger of being tortured.
Choosin Ngaotheppitak, the head of UNHCR's Hong Kong office, believes there is a need for a unified screening process. 'Basically the procedures are the same for torture claimants and asylum seekers [for refugee claims],' Ngaotheppitak said. 'When we have to do two processes it takes a lot of time. Secondly, the long process leaves cases open to abuse. So I think the best way is to combine the procedures.'
Ngaotheppitak suggested that Hong Kong gets 'directly involved in the determination of refugee status' - something the government is reluctant to do. Until five years ago the Director of Immigration had full discretion on whether to deport or refer to the UNHCR people claiming refugee status because of torture. That changed in 2004 when the Court of Final Appeal ruled that torture claims should be assessed by the secretary for security, which meant the government had to investigate such claims through 'fair procedures'.