bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Gary Cheung

Olga Wong

It was supposed to be a glowing moment for the environment chief. 
What if every family had a voucher to buy energy-saving light bulbs, Edward Yau Tang-wah  wondered. 
But the idea lit a fuse. Critics said the government intended the scheme to benefit one of Chief Executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen's in-laws, who is the biggest importer of a top brand of energy-saving bulbs.
Now the HK$240 million coupon scheme has quietly been dropped.
Yau said yesterday it was shelved after 'internal discussions' found it might require the use of public money and therefore could breach the government's user-pays principle.
Green groups criticised the Environment Bureau for using 'user-pays' as an excuse to bury a botched policy. Civic Party leader Audrey Eu Yuet-mee  said the chief executive, who announced the scheme in his policy address last year, had passed the buck by not explaining the decision himself.
Under the scheme, 2.4 million households would have received HK$100 coupons to spend on replacing their incandescent bulbs with compact fluorescent lamps, said to be up to 80 per cent more efficient.
It sparked allegations of favouritism after it emerged that Anthony Mok Kam-chuen,  father-in-law of Tsang's elder son, headed a firm distributing Philips light bulbs. Tsang labelled the allegations 'absolute fabrications' and 'vicious attacks'.
The scheme was originally to be financed through higher power bills but the government said last November it would look at other ways to pay for the coupons.
Yau said on a Metro Radio talk show yesterday that the government had realised it would be difficult to implement the scheme without it having an impact on electricity tariffs. 
'We have to be cautious if public money is incurred. Therefore, we decided not to go ahead with the scheme,' he said.
Friends of the Earth director Edwin Lau Che-feng  said the government was being inconsistent in shelving the scheme;  the Environment and Conservation Fund supported  district projects  to fund residents using energy-saving light bulbs. Organisations whose applications had been approved by the fund included  DAB Community Services  and the Ma On Shan Community Service Association.  
Eu said the government's reasoning for shelving the scheme was unconvincing. 
'The coupon scheme could encourage the public to switch to energy-efficient products. The government has provided incentives in recent years to induce people to adopt environment-friendly measures,' she said. 
It introduced a HK$3.2 billion scheme in 2007 to phase out old diesel vehicles and introduced tax concessions for buyers of cars deemed environmentally friendly.  
'The chief executive should have come out to explain to the public the decision to shelve the scheme but he has passed the buck to the environment minister,' Eu said, 'Donald Tsang has failed to do what a political leader is supposed to do.'
Hahn Chu Hon-keung,  the environmental affairs manager of Friends of the Earth, said the user-pays principle should not be an excuse to cover up a government mistake. 
'The British government spends money to help the poor adapt to climate change measures,' he said.



Energy-saving scheme fails to see light of day