Outdated plant will blow poisonous cocktail over Hong Kong residents
I refer to the excellent editorial ('Developing Lantau a delicate task', January 15) saying how ill-conceived the Environmental Protection Department's plan is to build a super-incinerator on Shek Kwu Chau off Lantau.
The department should be trying to reduce pollution, not increase it. Its reply that it won't increase it by very much, is just not what we expect of the so-called world-class government of 'Asia's world city'.
The obsolescent technology which the department proposes to use will spew dioxins and heavy metals and damaging particulates into the atmosphere. The department claims the winds will only blow this back over Hong Kong 8 per cent of the time ('Neighbours mull legal bid to stop incinerator', January 13). In fact the Hong Kong Observatory's figures show winds will blow this poisonous cocktail over Hong Kong for 25 per cent of the time, not 8 per cent. And even for the rest of the time, where will this toxic brew go? It will of course land in the sea, and affect marine life.
Modern proven technology exists which will not generate pollutants, but the department will not admit that it is making a mistake by choosing an outdated system. It prefers poisoning the population to losing face. The department has been stalling on updating Hong Kong's air quality objectives - if it did update them, this very project could not pass. So, it is cheating us.
Also, the reclamation at Shek Kwu Chau will cause the project to cost the taxpayer some HK$10 billion more than using alternative sites, and involve much higher ongoing running costs. So why has the department selected Shek Kwu Chau?
We taxpayers deserve better.
R. E. J. Bunker, Lantau