Why 'Long Hair' felt he had no choice
According to Nigel Ng ('Legco jester reaps his just deserts', March 24), legislator Leung Kwok-hung, better known as 'Long Hair', deserves a two-month jail sentence for disrupting one of the so-called public forums on proposed changes to the by-election mechanism held at the Science Museum.
However, it was obvious that the administration had taken steps to ensure few dissenting voices would attend the forum.
Many people who called up for places as soon as the forums were announced were told there were no places left. Subsequent reports revealed that many of the attendees were planted, and some of those registered did not even bother to turn up.
Therefore, I disagree with Magistrate Peter Law Tak-chuen when he said the behaviour of Leung [and the other defendants] had deprived others of the right to express their views. It was obvious that after half a million people voted in the May 2010 by-elections there was significant public interest in the consultation, but the public was excluded from participating in the forums.
If the then secretary for constitutional affairs, Stephen Lam Sui-lung, intended carrying out a genuine public consultation, the forums would have been held at much larger venues and places would have been allocated under a fair and equitable system.
The magistrate should have looked at the full picture.