• Thu
  • Oct 3, 2013
  • Updated: 4:17pm
Monitor
Thursday, 10 January, 2013, 7:33am

Early signs suggest new stamp duties haven't reined in prices

While sales have slumped in the wake of the levy, strong interest from wealthy locals in buying second flats has helped support home prices

At the end of October, the Hong Kong government slapped a punitive 15 per cent stamp duty on all non-resident and corporate buyers of residential properties in an attempt to make homes in the city more affordable for locals. More than two months later, we are beginning to get a taste of how the policy is working.

Clearly the new stamp duty, introduced at the same time as tax rates on quick sales were jacked up, is having an appreciable effect.

We can see that simply by looking at transaction volumes in the residential market. In November, immediately after the new duty's introduction, sales fell by almost 20 per cent compared with the month before. In December, they slumped another 50 per cent.

No doubt some of this fall was because of seasonal factors. December is seldom a great month for home sales. But transaction volumes last month were also down by 24 per cent compared with December 2011, which suggests the punitive tax rates are indeed deterring some would-be buyers.

What's more, although sales dropped across the board, the greatest falls took place at the pricier end of the market among flats worth HK$5 million or more. And November's numbers indicate that the slide in volumes was concentrated disproportionately in the primary market.

So it looks as if the punitive tax rates are succeeding in scaring away speculative buyers and those who don't hold Hong Kong permanent residency.

But it doesn't follow that deterring non-resident purchasers will make homes more affordable for locals.

Given the influx of foreign professionals into the city over the past few years, especially from crisis-hit Europe, it seems likely that many of the would-be buyers lacking permanent identity cards were not the out-of-town speculators of local legend, but recently arrived families making a life in the city.

If they can't buy, those families will naturally turn to the rental market, and that will tend to push rents higher.

It's hard to tell from the sketchy data so far, but this may be what we are seeing. According to the Ratings and Valuation Department, rents on flats with a floor area between 750 and 1,100 sqft rose 1.3 per cent in November. Annualised, that equates to an increase of 17 per cent.

Normally we are used to the idea that rising property prices tend to push rents higher. But the tail can also wag the dog.

A higher rental income makes it more attractive for existing owners with permanent residency to remortgage their homes and use the proceeds as a down payment on a second flat that they then rent out.

And that's what appeared to happen in November, with the number of refinancing mortgages jumping to its highest level in 17 months.

Stronger interest from wealthy locals in buying second flats, combined with the deterrent effect of the government's special stamp on sellers, adds up to some significant support for home prices, especially in the secondary market.

As a result, it should be little surprise that according to official figures, residential prices continued to grind higher in November, despite the government's efforts to massage them down.

And it looks as if the trend may have continued through December. The leading index of residential prices compiled by Centaline Property Agency has now climbed by 1.25 per cent since the late October imposition of the buyers' stamp duty on non-residents.

It's early days yet, of course. But it seems that despite a steep fall in transaction volumes in the primary market, the government's attempts to cool the property market have done nothing yet to make prices more affordable.

In fact, if the Centaline index is anything to go by, after an initial dip, home prices have already resumed their upward march.

tom.holland@scmp.com

6

This article is now closed to comments

neilandeunice
This makes complete sense. The tax is a tax against working expatriates that need to buy a home, not the super-Rich mainlanders, because most in the latter category already have some sort of local permanent residency done or in the works anyway.
dannyfung
speculation not backed up by data
SpeakFreely
Imagine what happen if no stamp duties implemented? I'm a landlord but I support the idea. Actually now all HK people are suffer dispute you own a home unless you own more than one properties or planning to sell your own to live overseas. Why? If you own one but the high price is affecting all cost ranging from food to transportation to education. You will still be worst off. You can't afford to switch to a nicer home. If you don't own anything, you are like a slave basically keep moving go a smaller and not so nice place to keep up with price. So the winners are only a very small group of people.
The most noticeable of eat out cost and quality. The cost has been up and the quality has been going downhill including street shops and 5 star hotels. The food in HK is getting so bad in the past few years and the service too....because restaurant owners ned to cut back and food cost is the thing that they can cut as rent and labor costs going up all the time. Service also going south particularly in 5 star hotels nowadays when you walk in you don't see servers.
blue
I like the food in Hong Kong. Tonight I will be eating spicy noodles and spicy pig ears at a small local restaurant I love. It is a simple pleasure I could never enjoy back where I lived in the USA. It is also not expensive either.
blue
So you're a landlord, an accountant, a director of a technology company, and you also have homes in the US and whine that in Hong Kong you're "poor" because everything is so expensive and the US is so much better. Oh and according to you the food is also terrible in Hong Kong. Got it.
While I do agree that there are definitely people getting a raw deal in Hong Kong, HK has many wonderful perks too. You have much better private property protections in Hong Kong because unlike the USA, civil forfeiture is not allowed in HK. In the USA the government can take away your property (Just like you know where!) without due process before you are even formally charged with a crime thanks to civil forfeiture. In Hong Kong your property can only be confiscated after you are convicted and the burden of proof is on the prosecution to prove the assets are connected with criminal activity. No such proof is required in the land of the free.
The USA also has one of the highest per capita incarceration rates in the world. It is on the same level as China and Russia. The per capita incarceration rate in HK is a fraction of what it is in the US. Also HK has low violent crime despite this unlike American cities.
Americans barely protest. They're just fat and more interested in watching the football game on TV. Most Americans just believe what the corporate owned media tells them to believe. Hong Kongers truly are protective of their core values and protest often as a result.
IRDHK
The government’s role should and only be to stop the steep increases in House prices. To this aim the government has succeeded as transactions are down and price growth is slowing dramatically. The idea of Tom that lowering house prices make them more affordable only means making them more affordable to people who want to buy second and third homes as they have good credit history. I am a home owner and support the new measures. Not because it makes homes more affordable but mainly because it will stop the bubble bursting badly later on which would be caused by large mortgages and the people being hit hard later on when mortgages jump. HK has pretty much removed the probability of negative equity due to high down payments and stopping price growth.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or