- Tue
- Jun 18, 2013
- Updated: 3:16pm
Trending topics
Sponsored topics
CY's well-intentioned housing supply policy likely to backfire
There's a real danger that new flow of flats will reach market just as mortgage rates go up, sending damaging waves across the economy
In his first policy speech yesterday, Hong Kong Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying announced plans to ramp up home building.
It's a well-intentioned move aimed at tackling the crippling supply shortage Leung blames for pushing housing prices and rents up to unaffordable levels.
Unfortunately, his new policy is likely to backfire spectacularly.
"Supply shortage lies at the heart of the prevailing housing problem," Leung declared yesterday.
At first this sounds like a reasonable deduction. As the chief executive pointed out, over recent years the number of new homes built in the city each year has tumbled to less than half that of a decade ago.
Over the last five years, developers have completed on average only around 10,000 private homes a year, while the government has added some 15,000 public rental flats, making a total of 25,000 new homes a year (see the first chart).
Over the same period, thanks largely to marriages, divorces and immigration, the number of households living in the city has grown at an average rate of around 28,500 a year.
The result of this under-supply, says Leung, is an acute housing shortage that has pushed the price of a new flat beyond the financial reach of many middle-class families and left more than 200,000 households on the waiting list for public rental flats.
Leung's solution is to bump up the supply of new homes. According to the plan he outlined yesterday, by 2017 the number of new public rental flats being completed should rise to 20,000 a year.
On top of that the government will build an additional 17,000 flats a year for sale to the public at subsidised prices. Meanwhile, the number of private sector completions is projected to double over the next few years to 20,000 a year.
In total then, over the next five years the supply of new homes should climb from 25,000 a year to more than 55,000. In the longer run, Leung pledged to increase the supply of building land to meet the city's future demand for housing.
This all sounds splendid, except there is a real danger that Leung's counter-cyclical attempt to make housing more affordable will end up providing enough pro-cyclical momentum to turn any coming property market correction into a full-blown slump.
At some time over the next few years the US unemployment rate will fall below 6.5 per cent, at which point the Federal Reserve will begin raising interest rates. Extrapolating the trend rate at which unemployment is currently falling, the first increase is likely to come early in 2015 (see the second chart).
At that point, the Fed might find itself forced to raise rates fairly aggressively, if it is to keep inflation in line with its 2 per cent target.
In other words, Hong Kong is likely to find itself facing sharply rising mortgage rates just as Leung's ramped-up supply of new homes reaches the market.
The effect would be devastating. At the moment, with interest rates at record lows, servicing a typical mortgage costs around half of median household income. As a result, any increase in interest rates will soon make paying a mortgage unaffordable for many homeowners, triggering a spate of sales and forcing down prices.
At the same time, the increased supply of public rental housing will reduce demand for rented accommodation in the private sector, pushing yields down and making property less attractive to investors.
The result is likely to be a nasty slide in property prices that could leave many recent buyers in negative equity.
Worse, it will erode the value of the only collateral that many local entrepreneurs have to offer against working capital loans for their companies, hammering business activity, job creation and economic growth.
At that point, no doubt, the government and developers will stop building. But the damage to Hong Kong's economy will already have been done.
Share
- Google Plus One
-
11Comments
After reading this article, people also read
6:53pm
At the root of the problem is Hong Kongers' irrational expectation that real estate has the best store of value, one based solely on past home appreciation. Only fools believe something would grow to the sky. That’s why Hong Kongers accept low rental yield.
Changing investment attitude and behavior takes decades.
Another reason against your good arguments is it is much easier to concentrate spending into few major construction projects instead of upgrading scattered properties into affordable flats for middle and lower income folks. But creating the bureaucracy to administer rental properties that won't continuously hemorrhage public funds presents another uncertainty.
Germany should not compared with other Western countries, let alone Hong Kong.
Unlike France or the UK, Germany doesn’t have wildcat strikes. When IG Metall establishes some guideline, it sets a constraint for other labor contract negotiations. In Germany, firms have labor representatives on the board, which is not what you find elsewhere.
Whereas in Hong Kong, we have a sizable population of self-hate nihilists, whose sole interest is to subvert China and our one country two systems, Germans are disciplined enough to resolve their regional differences for the interest of the nation, their federal system notwithstanding
3:22am
The present crazy priced property market has to deflate in order to restore sanity and prevent the whole population becoming economic slaves of the greedy, amoral developers. Who ever heard of property developers making 5 to 6 times their investment, dominating an entire economy and shafting buyers? Where else in the developed world does this happen? Bow Tie and Hooray Henry deliberately made this come about. Time for the filthy, corrupt developers to get shafted back.
Get real and grow up.
5:52pm
10:17am
HK problems is so structural that no one can actually solve the problem unless we all collectively bite the bullet together and compromise. hK people need not to argue anymore but just ask oursleves do we want to keep living in shoes box or follow the pattern of Singapore having a much more space and blue sky. But when I talk to HK people most will defend that "I don't want to live without freedom like the Singaporean...." If that really true that HK has more freedom or right of freedom than Singapore that justify for many living in coffin homes or average family of 400 st ft of space? It is the decision of HK people I believe.
11:08am
Because we are now at the stage of no going back. We have now so many stakeholders in HK fighting for their own benefits. House price down will make many people angry and they are the more powerful people. Environmentalist will stop all developments similar to the singapore style of using park lands for development. hK population can't be totally controlled either as some of that is not under our control.
So even there is a blue print from Singapore, a similar small Asian place, but we still can't follow because of HK people issue.It is impossible to have blue sky and a space that you can get in HK. I would encourage HK young people to leave HK for a better life. Period.
11:14am
10:02am
7:51am
Pages
In Case You Missed It
Login
SCMP.com Account
or
Log in using a partner site
Log in using your Facebook account. What's this?
Don't have an SCMP.com account? Subscribe Now!














