• Fri
  • Aug 1, 2014
  • Updated: 9:49am
PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 09 July, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 09 July, 2013, 5:01am

Supply is the key to ending Hong Kong's housing problems, not policy change

Pre-sale period lengthening designed to create impression of more residential units

Is Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying successfully convincing the public that his administration can provide enough affordable housing?

Over the past two weeks, the government has announced a series of policies including a revised plan for the development of the Northeast New Territories, a lengthening of the pre-sale period for private homes and an increase in the number of sites in its land sales programme.

Homebuyers may now be hoping that prices will fall in the short term as these measures are applied - but it may be too early for them to celebrate just yet.

The Northeast New Territories development is the subject of a continuing political fight and will face resistance even if it proceeds, as farmers and pro-democracy parties oppose it.

On the surface, the June 27 announcement on the extension of the pre-sale period for private residential developments from 20 months to 30 months may put 15,000 flats on the market. But will it help push prices lower? Unlikely.

The concern of some legislators that the extension would allow developers to sell their flats before prices fall is exaggerated. With more projects available for sale, developers will have flexibility to change their marketing plans - if demand for mass housing declines, they will sell more upmarket homes, or vice versa.

In other words, Hong Kong-listed developers will have more control over pricing and feel less compelled to cut prices to generate sales. Some believe the lengthening of the pre-sale period is designed to create more residential units.

It is like the policy that aims to help middle-income families buy flats in the secondary market - the Home Ownership Scheme (HOS). The chief executive said in July last year that 5,000 "white form" applicants - prospective buyers of subsidised units currently living in private flats who do not receive a housing subsidy - for HOS flats would be able to buy second-hand HOS flats without paying a land premium.

The announcement triggered a jump in the resale prices of HOS flats before the policy took effect last month. As a result, the scheme was criticised for having fuelled a rise in home prices.

By the end of last month, when the government announced the land sales programme for the third quarter, Secretary for Development Paul Chan Mo-po issued a rousing statement that the government would sell in the current financial year six more sites that would provide 1,500 new homes.

However, the government needed to earmark three sites in Shek Mun, Sha Tin, from the land sales programme originally allotted for private residential purposes for public rental housing. That will help the government meet its target of building at least 100,000 public housing flats in the five years to 2023.

Chan also admitted that about 22 sites in the land sale programme must be rezoned. That will take time.

Policy hops may raise homebuyers hopes in the short term, but, in the end, it is all about supply.



For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

For the long run Hong Kong should look at the shortage in housing problem not from the supply side. It must look from the demand side. Demand for housing must be curtailed as Hong Kong is running out of buildable land. While the birthrate in Hong Kong has become a negative growth, the home reunion policy that’s been for decades perhaps is the main source which keeping demand unstoppable. Plug that hole of 150 mainland folks coming to settle daily in Hong Kong before every village, mountain and hill must be leveled for new towns. The humanitarian reunion needs not only to be on HKSAR side nowadays. In fact, the policy was never really a humanitarian policy. It is a property development policy in creating housing demand in perpetuity for revenue and profits until Hong Kong is HKSAR no more.
Whether there is collusion between government and business especially with the property sector, it really can be judged by what being achieved – government’s revenue protected while business greatly profited and people pay for all. Collusion in fact is an effect that bears out from narrow view and interest policies. It is not like corruption breaking laws. It is total legitimate conducted in transparent procedures. I give credit to CY Leung in the beginning of his administration to be sensitive and take step to avoid the practice of collusion. Set fair policies. Here I would advise him to persevere. It is not difficult to collude in Hong Kong if the public still think our property developers are heroes who have created miracles for Hong Kong year after year.


SCMP.com Account