• Thu
  • Aug 28, 2014
  • Updated: 7:35am
Jake's View
PUBLISHED : Thursday, 08 August, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Thursday, 08 August, 2013, 3:50am

HSBC of today lacking in vision that had helped it grow

The banking giant is searching for ways to achieve earnings per share growth, but using the lean and mean strategy may be difficult

"In May 2013, we set out our plans for the next phase of delivering our strategy, covering the period from 2014 to 2016. Our strategic direction is unchanged and our priorities are clear."

Stuart Gulliver
HSBC group chief executive
SCMP, August 6

Back in the days when I worked as an investment analyst, this was the sort of statement I liked to hear at earnings results time from the companies I was covering.

It made life easy by offering plenty of opportunity to discuss how performance did or did not match the strategic direction targets, especially when these were given names - Growth Opportunities Through Human Resource Management, that sort of thing.

Waffle, waffle, waffle, I would have four pages of it between the share price chart up front and the half-page disclaimer on the back, all written up before London opened and it was time to get on the phone again - We maintain our "buy on weakness" (translation: Sell) recommendation on this stock.

But that's not the way I look at HSBC now.

Lean cows are not necessarily healthier than fat ones ... starving won't help

I could look at things as a customer of the bank does, sometimes pleased with the efficiency of its services, but displeased with the fees. Or, as yesterday, annoyed that I couldn't use my ATM card at an HSBC branch in Macau because Macau is now treated as abroad and I had not informed the bank I would be going there.

Let it pass. It was mostly the Hong Kong Monetary Authority's fault anyway.

Then again, I might decide to become morally high-minded. I could preach the evils of selling little old ladies "investment products" that they don't understand, or become thunderous about money-laundering offences that US authorities accused HSBC of committing.

But I won't. I also think HSBC is beginning to discover that laying off the risk of the derivatives book on retail customers can come back to bite you. I say beginning . I'm not sure they are quite there yet.

No, what I have in mind is the bank of earlier days, when population growth was soaring with economic migrants from Guangdong and the only hope for the economy was a labour-hungry garments industry founded by wealthier migrants from Shanghai.

What the combination needed was financial help, both in setting up the factories and arranging exports. It needed a bank with faith in its customers and the vision to make it all work. It got that bank.

I have in mind the bank of the days of Michael Sandberg and William Purves, both of whom made mistakes, some real howlers among them, but who generally got the big calls right and were people whom all the rest of staff looked up to as Boss. In those days, you bought that stock and just locked it away.

And now? I just don't see it anymore. Somewhere 10 or 15 years ago, the bank became a big moo cow, wandering around the pasture in search of greener grass but not knowing quite where to look, absorbed in earnings per share growth that became ever more difficult.

Mr Gulliver, of course, may say he has recognised the problem and adopted the solution of the mean and lean approach during his leadership of the past 2½ years. This is all very well but lean cows are not necessarily healthier than fat ones. If it's still a cow, starving it won't help.

I am all in favour of earnings per share growth. I look for it in my investments. And cost control is obviously a good way of achieving it. But the firms that consistently achieve it tend to be those of vision. I saw that in the old HSBC. I don't see it in the same way today.

What's needed is that vision thing that built this bank in the first place. It's about inspiring people all the way down to the most recently hired clerk with a sense of common purpose and achievement. It can happen again, but I don't think it's happening now.

jake.vanderkamp@scmp.com

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

3

This article is now closed to comments

shakshi
THE WORLDS LOCAL LAUNDRY HAS STARTED CLOSING ACCOUNTS OF VARIOUS BUSINESSES INSTEAD OF REGULATING THEM AND ASKING THEM TO MAINTAIN THEIR ACCOUNTS IN A PRESCRIBED MANNER.
KNEE JERK REACTION OR IS IT PASSING THE BUCK? MORE LIKE PASSING ON THE BLAME.THIS WILL CERTAINLY MAKE LOSSES FOR HSBC. OVER THE BILLIONS ALREADY PAID AS FINES.
pslhk
Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation heralded
Asia’s prevalence over the West
It easily turned the one holding a royal charter into an also-ran
As the central clearer rigging the market was a must
Standard spread of deposit and prime was 6%
BLR for mortgage added another 3%
With a lion’s share of local deposit
Fx operation was simply rent collection
debt dominated the capital market
other banks, especially locals were denied room to grow
but that also rendered it totally unprepared for the Big Bang
97 turned the Asian giant into a sea turtle
that had to buy local favors and reincarnate as HSBC
to learn survival in the Old Lady’s orphanage
MS and WP were old school, saved by their unfamiliarity with new new things
JB was transitory, showering farewell benefits to donkeys
too old fashioned to see changes in the offing
WP rightly observed that bright and well-educated HK Chinese
won’t consider a career in colonial banking
Then HKMA became the central clearer
When SG tookover the bank was already lethargic old money
As evident in his Good Value
he was quite lost about his purposes
impala
[Let it pass. It was mostly the Hong Kong Monetary Authority's fault anyway.]

Really? Funny how none of the other HKMA regulated banks have anything like this HSBC ATM card fiasco.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or