• Thu
  • Oct 23, 2014
  • Updated: 4:46pm
Business
AVIATION

Why US passengers loathe airport productivity gains

Surveys may show them to be productive but the American system is still way behind Asia's best

PUBLISHED : Monday, 19 May, 2014, 10:13am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 20 May, 2014, 12:49am

Flying from Hong Kong to the United States recently, I occupied myself reading economist Tyler Cowen's book Average Is Over.

This is one of many recent works warning of rising inequality, but Cowen makes it clear the problem is not with the rich but with those who do not have the skills or smarts to compete in today's hi-tech economies.

He argues, for example, that the Americans who lost their jobs in the recession of 2009 were the least productive workers - and they may never be rehired, even in a full-blown recovery, because employers have learned to get by with fewer but better workers.

Many regulars to the US have at least one tale of a nasty run-in with some cranky flight attendant

But then, I landed in Chicago, where it would seem that a number of incompetent workers have escaped the 2009 purge, at least at O'Hare International.

Either that, or the "fewer but better workers" paradigm is going to be increasingly tough on the customer.

I felt particularly sorry for an utterly confused, stranded family of Indian passengers trying to locate an airline staffer to help them; perhaps they were hoping to take a vacation from their own country's famous chaos, only to arrive at an airport system that even US Vice-President Joseph Biden has described as "third world".

Two decades ago, when I moved to Hong Kong, the flights home to America were usually without incident. These days, there is always something.

With my arrival in Chicago last week, that something was an overheated, smoking bathroom fan in a flight tower, causing the evacuation of the tower's air traffic controllers - that is, it was incompetence.

Mid-air flights were diverted and hundreds of flights cancelled, with the consequential host of rebooking nightmares and lost luggage.

I listened to other passengers' horror stories as I waited for my connection, which I only made by ignoring an overwhelmed American Airlines employee who said my flight was cancelled and sent me to the back of an endless queue to rebook (the electronic departures board luckily told me otherwise).

The next day, as I waited for my luggage to arrive, I jumped on Google and learned something very interesting: US airports receive higher productivity ratings than those in Asia or Europe. Imagine that.

The reason? They process more passengers using fewer employees.

Yet passengers loathe US airports. In a recent survey of world airports by Skytrax, not one US facility cracked even the top 25 best airports, while half the top 10 were in Asia.

One reason is that Asia's airports are newer on average, so the infrastructure is better. They also process a higher percentage of foreign travellers, so are better at dealing with international flights.

It's not just the facilities, though.

Many regular flyers to the United States have at least one tale of a nasty run-in with some cranky flight attendant, usually described as an ancient, beak-nosed crone whose wide hips rendered the aisles impassable.

This compares with Asian airline staff, who are invariably slender, good-looking and youthful, just like they used to be in the West in the 1950s.

But have a little pity for those grumpy American flight attendants. They once had a certain degree of economic power; now they have very little.

They have been on the front lines of cost-cutting as the competitive landscape sharpened for US airlines, owing to everything from the deregulation of the industry that began in the late 1970s to the forces of globalisation and mechanisation.

Last year, American Airlines and Delta made a little more than US$400,000 revenue per employee. This is double the US$200,000 per employee revenue they got in 2004.

So investors can say: hey, this is a great story of efficiency improvement. Economists can say: this is the future; companies will do more and more with fewer employees, so get used to structurally high unemployment.

Customers, however, may sense a flaw in the system as they make their way through a US airport, desperately seeking a live body to help them with one problem or another.

On the ground, it often looks like US airports could use a few more workers, some of whom might manage to be at least marginally effective.

And it is on the ground, of course, where you'll often be when flying in the US.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

7

This article is now closed to comments

Laisee.com.hk
Cathy, great article, well written, insightful and unique. You need to write more of these.
pragmatist
US has lost its way and too focused on silly apps and flipping them on nasdaq.
SpeakFreely
US airport are designed for efficiency not luxury. If you want to compare, compare the newer side of Chicago and NJ airport, I would say they are more "efficient" than hk airport as they have more access to coffee, bar, and quick lunch or dinner all over, and more plug in for charging and toilet than hk airport. uS airport are better designed for biz traveling as u see people are on laptop or ipad working all the time. Hk airport provides a lot of luxury shopping but hard to find real coffee like Starbucks, only 4 or 5 in the airport? Talking about efficiency, I still seeing hk airport cleaning staff taking out garage from garage bin using a tool piece by piece to save the cheap garage bag, it is inefficient and dirty. I still see US tech is 10 times more advance and efficient than hk, if you goto supermarket in US they have free wifi, very good service and cheaper price than hk by at least 50%. Goto Home Depot, or bestbuy shop and compare to Fotress Hk website. It is like university gard vs kindgard. In Home Depot, if I want to return an item without a receipt, they can easily strip my credit card and found the item I want to return. If I want save time before going to store, I search on Walmart, homedepot bestbuy etc. and the item will be in the store close to me to pick up...this Is call tech...overall hk is still using chesp labour to provide so call service. But Fotress, Watsons, or Parknshop if they provide same service and tech in US they would have already go under ..
SpeakFreely
To give u how efficient is US few more example. We only have one guard in our gated golf community home but we have access to web to update who is our visitor that the guard knows in advance. Resident pass thru the gate with sensor in the car like auto toll but is smaller eletronic sticker. Home Depot at the cashier you can have hard copy plus receipt sent to u via email. I have made appointment to see doctor and getting text msg reminding me about my appointment. In hk if I goto sop in Parknshop in tai po, one trip is easily 2 hrs total including drive in finding the parking. Here is 24 hrs shopping and I get all in one place. Food, electronics etc in Walmart one place.
SpeakFreely
Banking is very efficient here as most people use online. I can even deposit check online via smartphone a year ago. When u goto the brach, not many, less than one minute wait with nice n clean toilet and free coffee much better than hk hsbc primer account service. Every church I go to have free wifi, some with online streamline and smart phone apps. Very tech...hk is like in the 80 in tech that we have hi speed internet but no apps...
chaz_hen
It's why, with all my powers and will, I try my best to avoid flying in ANY American flag carrier unless absolutely, unavoidably necessary. It's also why I prefer avoiding the continental US as much as possible.
keresearch
its probably mutual
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or