Advertisement
Hong Kong's third runway proposal
Business
Howard Winn

Lai See | Hong Kong will get its third runway by hook or by crook

Reading Time:2 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP
Coming into view.

The 30-day consultation period for the environmental impact assessment for the third airport runway is over and all that is needed now is for the Environmental Protection Department to apply its rubber stamp.

The assessment report will next be scrutinised by Anissa Wong Sean-yee in her capacity as director of environmental protection. She also wears another hat - permanent secretary of the Environment Bureau, where her role is to advance government policy.

There is clearly a conflict of interest here. It is hard to imagine that her career will be advanced by knocking back environmental impact assessments of favoured government projects. The last report to be rejected was in 2000 when the director of environmental protection, Robert Law, reviewed the Kowloon-Canton Railway's Lok Ma Chau spur line.

Advertisement

In those days, the director of environmental protection was a qualified environmental scientist and the role of permanent secretary of the Environmental Bureau was held by a career bureaucrat.

When Law retired, the government swiftly put a stop to independent thought being applied to environmental impact assessments and the permanent secretary and director roles were combined. This ploy of downgrading expertise within government departments has occurred elsewhere, notably with respect to the government's archives and records.

Advertisement

Given the current political climate, it is not hard to believe that it is no accident that the government's records are shambolic and unlikely to be of much use to anyone hoping to construct a historical account of the early days of one country, two systems. It is therefore hardly surprising that since the Hong Kong-Macau bridge assessment, public confidence and trust in the assessment process has declined.

It is interesting to see that the runway assessment report concludes the section on air quality with the observation: "In view of the above assessment findings, it can be concluded that operation of the project will not result in adverse residual air quality impacts."

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x