• Wed
  • Dec 24, 2014
  • Updated: 9:42am
Jake's View
PUBLISHED : Thursday, 14 August, 2014, 12:34am
UPDATED : Thursday, 14 August, 2014, 12:34am

Haeco grounded by elite bank jobs that pay more

Despite its No 2 world ranking, the aircraft maintenance company's best days may be behind them with their labour shortages likely to worsen

A shortage of labour is limiting Hong Kong's position in the aircraft maintenance industry even though it is home to the world's No 2 service provider.

Business, August 11

That No 2 ranking in the aircraft maintenance business is a little dubious. It is done on the basis of market capitalisation, which means that any contender must first be a separate listed company. Many are not. Total revenues or maintenance hours would be a better measure.

But Hong Kong Aircraft Engineering Company is still a company that has impressed me right from my investment analyst days when they used to offer us tours at Kai Tak once a year and showed how they had all the equipment to put together a Boeing 747 from the ground up.

Then there was the time that the late Vic Locke, commodore of the yacht club, ran his aluminium-built yacht, Bugis, across a rock somewhere near Port Shelter, and put a kink in it.

The boys at Haeco took it out of the water, put it on the rack, and, "pop", Bugis was all shipshape again. But to everything there is a season and it may just be that Haeco's best days are over, that it just doesn't make sense to have such a big maintenance centre here any longer.

Hong Kong people just don't want the jobs. They want to work in banks and Haeco won't make you rich. In a bank job you have a chance.

As the chart shows, we crossed a benchmark in our employment statistics this year. There are now more than one million job holders with a degree from a tertiary institute of education.

This amounts to 27 per cent of the total employment rolls, a figure that has doubled in just 15 years.

Many of these degree holders slaver for the get-rich-quick bank jobs as they enter the workforce and the large majority of them will be frustrated. Only if daddy maintains US$100 million with the bank is son or daughter guaranteed a job there.

But why is it that in a work force with a million people who have gone to the time and effort of acquiring a full tertiary level education there are not enough people who have directed their education towards the skilled jobs that Haeco has on offer?

Part of the answer obviously lies in the fact that at Haeco you have to wear a maintenance uniform rather than suit and tie and you have to dirty your hands a little. But there are many bank jobs of far greater drudgery than anything to which Haeco puts its people.

I think in the end it just comes down to the money. I am not privy to the Haeco pay scale but the company faces a conundrum that will simply not go away. Either the pay goes way up and slowly the word goes out that Haeco is a good place to work or its labour shortage will get worse.

And if paying more means that Haeco is no longer competitive in the worldwide aircraft maintenance market, then so be it. Hong Kong's window of opportunity in this business will have been exploited fully during the few decades the window was open and now it is Pakistan's turn or Brazil's.

Haeco, in my view, is a bellwether for much that will change in the make-up of Hong Kong's economy over the next few years.

But while it would be sad to lose a company like this or see it dwindle, the same could be said of many garment companies that are now only names from the past.

If it must go, then let it go. This town will still move on.



For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

What total and utter c-rap based on a complete misreading of the article. JC, you need to learn some comprehension skills.
HK is too good and upper-crust for an aircraft maintenance facility, so says Jake. So send these to third world countries like Pakistan and Brazil! Every single graduate in town wants to be a banker. Yet in the same breath, he admits that few can get a shot, partly because not everyone has a daddy with a US$100m account! So what happens to the rest Jake? What will also happen to the non-graduates in the city, and the many others who work for Haeco? Join the MTR and help them to plug the 2-year delay in the high speed railway to Guangzhou? Or you know what, maybe they can try their luck in Jake's beloved Singapore or Dubai - third world countries whose MRO businesses are expanding. In his eyes, the financial and services sector, and may I add the construction/real estate/tourism, represent the apex of economic development! And HK is right there at the top, one of the "richest" cities in the world! Skills-based technical jobs in MRO, as well as the port/logistics business are for the birds. In short, as usual JVDK talks the **** of a "free market" that he knows little about. Has he ever studied economic developmental theories? Or was it merely Freudian psychology and how to spook unwitting readers with the promise of freedom and capital? This town will move on - another typical parting shot of false bravado and pride. Oops! Pardon my slip!
So what is your definitive interpretation wise guy? Who doesn't know that the basic message is labour shortage for various reasons; time for Haeco to go? That's Jake's free market for you. The option of the loosening of restrictions for freer movement of labour into HK to possibly address this problem was not even mentioned! In the world's "freest" economy, free movement of capital is paramount, but not labour! It's the same for his argument about the port business as well, Partly labour shortage, partly land that could be used for housing. London doesn't have a substantial one. So does NY. HK will survive and thrive as a financial town. Send the port business, like MRO business to countries behind the curve. HK is a financial town. Like London and NY. That's been the underlying message. Same here. Same for the decline of the port business. Same also for his rant against the government's attempts to build a hi-tech sector. So what happens to the non financial guys, and above all non graduates? Got an answer wise guy? Well if you can't read the sarcasm in my first comment, then I am afraid it is you who needs help with comprehension


SCMP.com Account