Advertisement
The View
Business
The View
Richard Wong

How development regulation costs have exacerbated Hong Kong’s housing shortage

3-MIN READ3-MIN
Mass residential housing in Tseung Kwan O, Kowloon. Over the past three decades, Hong Kong’s housing and land policies have been riddled with problems. Photo: EPA
Richard Wong Yue-chim is the Philip Wong Kennedy Wong Professor in Political Economy at the University of Hong Kong

Since the mid-1980s, the difference between private residential property prices and building costs have risen dramatically, averaging 70 per cent higher when compared to earlier periods.

This increased gap is a measure of the regulation cost of development and building construction and it explains why development has been slow, why fewer units have been supplied, and why they are fetching much higher prices relative to construction costs compared to the past.

How does the regulation of land development and building construction in Hong Kong delay housing supply?

Advertisement

Regulators seek to minimise incompatible land uses and maximise compatible ones – to generate positive neighbourhood effects and mitigate negative ones. Markets alone sometimes fail to correct for these effects, which is why planning rules and building codes have been invented. Unfortunately their effects on land and housing supply are not always foreseen.

In Hong Kong, there is a belief that rising property prices are the result of a conspiracy between an oligopolistic property development industry and corrupt government officials. The coincidence of four factors has contributed to that belief: a tight, slowly developing housing market, the perception that government has always had a high land price policy, the failure of government both before and after 1997 to sufficiently increase the amount of land for development, and the market dominance of a few large property developers.

Advertisement
Hong Kong’s big developers came to dominate the market due to historical circumstances surrounding the development of satellite towns in the New Territories in the 1980s. Photo: SCMP Pictures
Hong Kong’s big developers came to dominate the market due to historical circumstances surrounding the development of satellite towns in the New Territories in the 1980s. Photo: SCMP Pictures
I have not found this narrative to be a sufficiently convincing explanation for rising property prices. Although the four developers came to dominate the market due to historical circumstances surrounding the development of satellite towns in the New Territories, their good acumen (or fortune) in accumulating land exchange entitlements, and the redemption of these entitlements before the restoration of sovereignty, the gap between property prices and building costs started to rise rapidly in the decade beginning in the mid-1980s before they achieved market dominance. And it continued after 2012, when the government introduced punitive measures to curb their pricing powers.
Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x