bodyType

customContents

entityId

entityUuid

articlePageQuery

filter

article

articleBaseAdvertisingInfoArticle

articleListArticle

articleSeoArticle

hooksArticleAcknowledgementGateOverlayArticle

hooksTrackPageViewArticle

hooksContentInterestArticle

articleLinkingDataContent

hooksAmpRedirectArticle

articleSchemaContent

liveArticle

advertZone

sentiment

contentLock

topics

types

sections

paywallTypes

createdDate

publishedDate

sponsorType

urlAlias

moreOnThisArticles

commentCount

authorLocations

authors

corrections

displaySlideShow

multimediaEmbed

printHeadline

seriesContainer

articleSpeeches

socialHeadline

headline

images

flag

firstTopic

glossary

flattenTypeIds

image

relatedLinks

relatedNewsletters

__typename

sponsor

pdfFiles

seriesReverseOrder

series

disableOffPlatformContent

published

updatedDate

summary

subHeadline

body

keywords

readingTime

customTimezone

liveContents

Jake Van Der Kamp

Hong Kong is losing out to Singapore in fintech development because securities and insurance regulators have not done enough to encourage the development of a flexible regulatory culture supportive of new services ...
-- SCMP Business, April 19
What charming irony. A city where a long list of do-and-don’t restrictions governs practically every step the inhabitants take is now said to have a more flexible regulatory structure than Dodge City.
Yup, flexible alright. They certainly do a lot of flexing in Singapore, what with the weight of the rule book that dictates their lives.
Have you heard, for instance, why fishing has never taken off there as either industry or sport? You haven’t? Well, the reason is that in Singapore even the fish don’t dare open their mouths.
But let’s separate this matter of fintech into its two different parts.
Finance (that’s the “fin” part of fintech, you know) has two different aspects – the payments system and the financing of assets.
The world leader in payments is probably China. Who bothers going to a shop any longer in a major Chinese city? You look up what you want on the web, you order it and you authorise the transaction with an account and PIN number instruction to your payment agency (a bank, let’s say).
The vendor then similarly confirms the transaction and your purchase is quickly loaded on a motorised trishaw at the warehouse. You may have it delivered to you as quickly as within the hour.
I think one reason that China has led in this particular fintech revolution is that it never had much of a high street or mall culture, certainly not on the scale of the United States or western Europe, and just jumped over this transition stage.
Another reason may be that, with all the strictures of a command economy, normal human ingenuity channelled itself into advances that a command economy did not control, leave alone recognise.
Whatever the case, they are ahead of us here on the mainland. We still have shops where fintech is a plastic cash bucket hanging from the ceiling by a bungee cord.
Then again, perhaps we don’t want more. Causeway Bay has always been a magnet to my children. That noisy, busy, tactile shopping experience has its delights and, with our superb transport links, there is no problem getting there.
The financing side of the equation is another matter and there are good reasons why we may not formally want to adopt the latest fashion here – crowd funding.
The problem lies not so much in the “tech” of how the money is raised. You make a general appeal, sort of like the Community Chest, and people respond.
It works fine for charities when those who subscribe the money want in return only the thanks of the organisers for having met their social obligations.
This is, in fact, what crowd funding often comes to. Supposedly commercial ventures mostly turn out to be social enterprises, exercises in hubris that scorn return on investment as greed.
The backers have done good for humanity. Who needs profit, when you can live on government grants?
But it does not work well for real commercial ventures, which is why crowd funding will never amount to much.
The problem is that outside investors, few of whom can know as much about the business as the insiders do, need some element of protection from insiders who regard them -- as Beijing does for instance -- purely as sheep for the shearing.
This is why we have listing requirements and we demand prospectuses with audited accounts for companies that pitch the public for money.
Call them barriers, obstacles, hindrances to development, if you will. The clever lawyers who live by pulling the wool over the listing committee’s eyes certainly say so.
But if we did not have these rules we would soon also not have the sheep. We would have killed them off.
Fintech does not really offer us an easy way over these hurdles to public investment. At issue are not questions of technology, but of human nature. Technology does not have the answers to them and never will.
I am all for a flexible regulatory culture in the payments system. Bring it on. But I want a stiff legal culture to govern the stocks I buy.


The tale of murkiness that is the Lok Ma Chau Loop

China refusal to apologise for CCTV blackface skit all wrong

Plug Hong Kong Disney’s bottomless cash sinkhole forever and ever, and use its magic land for homes

China’s got a trade problem that can’t be solved by Belt and Road

Jake's View

A plea for rules, even if Hong Kong loses in fintech to Singapore

Call them barriers, obstacles, hindrances to development, if you will, but we need these rules.

Rimsky Yuen Kwok-keung, Secretary for Justice; Geoffrey Ma Tao-li, the Chief Justice of the Court of Final Appeal; and Winnie Tam Wan-chi, chairman of the Hong Kong Bar Association, attend the Opening of Legal Year 2017 at Edinburgh Place, Central. Photo: Sam Tsang

An emerging Asia-Pacific fintech hub: Hong Kong

InvestHK

Asia fintech deals near US$10b amid mega funding in China

Fintech investments on the mainland have reached US$8.848 billion this year to July 31. Photo: iStockphoto

Banks and fintechs grow closer as winning customers toughens

Making an online payment by credit card. Fintechs and traditional banks are now eager to work together, as opposed to against each other to attract new customers. Photo: Shutterstock

China’s FinTech sector expands into regulatory AI, big data analytics, PsP and robo-advisory facilities

China’s mobile payment systems set new technological standards. Photo: Alamy

Paul Sin, Deloitte China Consulting Partner, who also leads the Fintech Practice

Henri Arslanian, PwC FinTech & RegTech Lead, PwC China and Hong Kong.

Vincent Chan Wing-shing, a member of Digital Strategy Steering Group and the co-convenor of Information Technology Interest Group of the Hong Kong Institute of CPAs

Accounting and Auditing

China’s lead in fintech investment an opportunity for UK firms, says report

China leads the world in capital being poured into the financial technology sector, with investment estimated to top 56 billion yuan 6.5 billion British pounds in 2016. Photo: AFP

Business

Tech

Opinion

Enterprises

Big Tech

Innovation

Call them barriers, obstacles, hindrances to development, if you will, but we need these rules.


Banking & finance

Hong Kong innovators

Expresses the views, ideas and conclusions of the author. (Eg. Enough of Crazy Rich Asians, think of crazy poor Hongkongers.)


Column

.css-1m2rp1p{color:#34b8b5;}Jake's View | A plea for rules, even if Hong Kong loses in fintech to Singapore

.css-1c6uqr6{color:inherit;font-weight:inherit;font-size:inherit;font-family:inherit;line-height:inherit;overflow-wrap:break-word;}Call them barriers, obstacles, hindrances to development, if you will, but we need these rules.

Jake's View | A plea for rules, even if Hong Kong loses in fintech to Singapore

Call them barriers, obstacles, hindrances to development, if you will, but we need these rules.