• Sun
  • Aug 31, 2014
  • Updated: 6:22pm
BusinessBanking & Finance
LENDING

Rafael Hui borrowed HK$75m - but how?

That's what legislators want to know after revelations of the scale of bank loans to the now-bankruptformer chief secretary

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 28 December, 2013, 12:39am
UPDATED : Saturday, 28 December, 2013, 4:37am

Legislators have questioned how Hong Kong banks came to lend a sum believed to exceed HK$75 million to former chief secretary Rafael Hui Si-yan - an amount equal to almost 200 times his monthly salary while he was still in office, and more than 900 times the monthly pension he received when he retired in 2007.

The massive debt accumulated by Hui saw him default on his loan repayments and declared bankrupt last month.

"It is a question of whether the banks were too generous in granting such a huge amount of unsecured loans and, if so, why?" Democratic Party legislator Sin Chung-kai said.

"We want the Hong Kong Monetary Authority to check if the banks were prudent and did a proper credit assessment before granting the loans to Mr Hui."

Christopher Cheung Wah-fung, legislator for the financial services sector, also questioned the loans and pointed out that even broking houses would not advance such huge unsecured loans to their customers.

"Brokers would only grant such huge loans if they held the stock bought by the customer as collateral. The HKMA needs to check whether banks have been too lax in lending money to senior civil servants," Cheung said.

During the past few months, several banks filed writs of demand against Hui. These revealed that he owed Chong Hing Bank HK$9.8 million, Honour Finance HK$3.16 million, Standard Chartered Bank HK$1.19 million, and Hang Seng Bank HK$780,000.

In April, Bank of East Asia filed a writ demanding that Hui repay money due under two overdraft facilities and on two credit cards. When BEA failed to recover the money it filed a bankruptcy petition against Hui in September and the order was granted by the High Court on November 27.

BEA did not disclose the amount it was claiming from Hui, but media reports suggest it amounted to HK$60 million.

Responding to queries from the South China Morning Post, a spokeswoman said the Monetary Authority would not intervene in banks' individual lending decisions. "The HKMA has a guideline on prudent lending procedures for banks. This includes checking the asset quality and other collateral of the borrowers," the spokeswoman said.

A spokeswoman for BEA refused to confirm the amount owed by Hui. "Due to customer privacy, we will not comment on any individual customer's case," the spokeswoman said. "We want to emphasise that the bank always follows its credit approval policy and guidelines when granting credit facilities."

She said the bad debt would not have a significant impact on BEA results this year.

A senior government official told the Post he had not experienced any problems raising bank loans or a mortgage. "Generally, the banking sector is more relaxed in lending to civil servants and we can get a reasonable personal loan and can get loans at a relatively lower interest rate. This is because we have a stable income and a reliable pension," he said.

A banker, who did not work for one of the banks involved in Hui's case, said it was reasonable for banks to be generous when lending to senior government officials and their loans were advanced after a reasonable credit assessment. "When compared with many other jobs, civil servants have an 'iron rice bowl'. They are unlikely to be laid off and get a salary increase almost every year. When they retire, they enjoy a stable pension income every month until their death. The odds of loans given to civil servants going bad are very low."

The banker said non-government officials with stable incomes and good credit records and lots of assets could also get loans easily. "The key issue is whether the bank considers that a borrower is able to repay the loan," he said.

Alan Tang Chung-wah, a partner and head of specialist advisory services in the Hong Kong office of mainland accounting firm ShineWing, who is an expert in bankruptcies, said the banks could now apply to have Hui's assets, including properties or investments, liquidated.

For the next four years Hui would also be subject to the restrictions placed on a person that is declared bankrupt, which means he may not serve as a director of a company.

Hui would also be required to live a basic and simple lifestyle - which means he may not live in deluxe housing or take taxis or go to five-star hotels for meals. He may not travel without a good reason and may not be given a credit card or other bank loans.

Tang said a portion of Hui's income would be handed over to the Official Receiver's Office towards repayment of his loans from the five lenders.

After the four-year period is up the bankruptcy orders will be dismissed, but then any of the five lenders that are still owed money could apply to the court to renew a bankruptcy order for up to another four years, Tang said. After that period the banks could no longer pursue Hui to repay his debts.

"In a sense, Mr Hui could be free again in eight years' time. He could be a director again and return to his normal lifestyle. He could also apply for bank loans then," Tang said.

According to the Civil Service Bureau guideline for bankrupt civil servants, Hui's HK$80,000 monthly pension payment will be suspended during the period he is under a bankruptcy order. The payment of the pension will be resumed once he is discharged from bankruptcy.

During the bankruptcy he may apply to the bureau for an ex gratia payment to cover his daily expenses or repay his debts.

Under the bankruptcy order, Hui - who is involved in a corruption case with Sun Hung Kai Properties' co-chairmen Thomas Kwok Ping-kwong and Raymond Kwok Ping-luen - will not be allowed to hire an expensive barrister to represent him in the criminal trial due to be heard in May next year. But lawyers said if his family was willing to pay the fees, he could still hire a lawyer of his choice.

The Independent Commission Against Corruption alleges that between 2000 and 2009 Hui took more than HK$34 million in bribes and enjoyed the rent-free use of a flat in Happy Valley in return for favours.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

9

This article is now closed to comments

ianson
In his position as Chief Secretary, any lending involving him will have been known at the very highest levels in each of these lending institutions, at the director level. They will have had their own reasons for ensuring Rafael H u i 's head was deep in their trough. Has the ICAC the gumption to take them on?
[spaced out surname due to SCMP's crazy autocensoring system]
Dao-Phooy
These top civil servants are grossly overpaid by the public purse and also receive preferential treatment from the banks? Who will conduct a thorough review of this egregious situation - pigs at the trough! Hard working citizens at the bottom end of society are expected to survive on $30 an hour and be grateful for this? This article highlights the stench those at the top are giving off! Their greed is simply out of control!
mercedes2233
Why does a person with no children, who has a high-paying job and received zillion in bribes, need to borrow so much money for?
johnyuan
I was told by my neighborhood’s grocer more than a decade ago that government colluded with business people in Hong Kong. I wish this unfortunate relationship has truly come to an end. It should be reasonably true for the statement that the current government is different.
.
Collusion between government and business people who were in property development had been practiced as a high art. No physical evidence could ever be found as there were no conversations or written contract. Things just fell into place by understanding of mutual benefits; immediately or one’s future. Nevertheless, the effects of collusions were not concealable – even my grocer saw through them.
.
Since there is no law against collusion, collusion has the confidence to be the ruling principle of Hong Kong. The powerless people are its victims. It has caused so much of social commotions.
.
Rule of law can be circumvented by the art of collusion.
daily
I think the ICAC should also investigate the banks involved in the loans.........there is no possible way that normal prudent lending guidelines would allow **** to borrow that large amount of money.
Anyways, by the time this ordeal is over, **** would either still be in jail (if the HK courts had any justice at all) or he would be too old to enjoy what's left of his pension.............this guy really screwed himself to the very core of everything he worked for his whole life.
chuchu59
RH only had a monthly pension of around $80 ,000. How could the banks be convinced to advance loans of millions to him. How would he be able to repay unless he was employed again.
John Adams
$75 million / 200 = 375,000 per month
Was H-U-I really earning that much per month when he retired ?
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or