• Thu
  • Dec 25, 2014
  • Updated: 4:14pm

Huawei Technologies

The world’s biggest telecom equipment maker, Huawei Technologies Co was sued by Cisco Systems in 2003 for allegedly infringing on its patents. In the US, security officials have accused it of allowing unauthorized access by the Chinese People's Liberation Army through its equipment. US political opposition forced Huawei to withdraw its purchase of 3Leaf systems in 2010.

BusinessChina Business
TELECOMMUNICATIONS

New Huawei, ZTE complaints trigger second US probe

PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 10 October, 2012, 11:13am
UPDATED : Thursday, 29 August, 2013, 4:13am

A US congressional report that urged American companies to stop doing business with Chinese telecom equipment makers Huawei and ZTE has triggered a fresh wave of complaints against the firms, opening a second phase to the panel’s investigation.

A staff member of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee said the panel has been receiving “dozens and dozens” of calls from current and former employees and customers reporting supposedly suspicious equipment behaviour, chiefly involving Huawei.

“I don’t think the companies should expect our attention to stop,” the staff member said, adding that the panel would follow up on new leads. The staffer was not authorised to speak publicly on the matter.

In a report issued on Monday after an 11-month investigation, the House committee warned US industry that Beijing could use equipment made by the two companies to spy on certain communications and threaten vital systems through computerised links. It urged network providers to seek other vendors.

The report also advised the Committee on Foreign Investments in the United States (CFIUS), an inter-agency government panel that vets foreign deals for security concerns, to block any future business tie-ups involving Huawei or ZTE and US companies.

Huawei, the world’s second-largest maker of routers and other telecom gear, and ZTE, the fifth-largest, both rejected the allegations. China’s Commerce Ministry said the US committee had “made groundless accusations against China”.

Adding to Huawei’s problems, Canada indicated on Tuesday that it would exclude Huawei from firms allowed to build a secure Canadian government communications network, citing possible security risks.

I don’t think the companies should expect our attention to stop

In March, Australia barred Huawei from seeking contracts for the country’s National Broadband Network due to cyber security concerns.

By contrast, the European Commission has delayed a trade case against the two Chinese telecom equipment makers, easing tensions between the European Union and its second-biggest trading partner.

Huawei is employee owned, has operations in more than 150 countries, with more than two-third of its annual revenue of US$32.4 billion earned outside China.

In early trade on Wednesday, ZTE’s Hong Kong-listed shares were up as much as 4 per cent after having fallen 11 per cent during the previous two days. Several brokerages said the investigations were likely to have minimum impact on ZTE’s bottom line, with investors switching their focus to 4G spending, which is expected to benefit the company.

The US panel’s 52-page report did not present concrete evidence that the companies’ equipment had been used for espionage, but a classified annex provides “significantly more information adding to the committee’s concerns”, it said.

Current and former US intelligence officials said Huawei and ZTE, both based in Shenzhen, pose potential national security threats, but there did not appear to be a consensus about whether security breaches involving their equipment had been confirmed.

One former US official said there were “smoking guns” that justified suspicions about Huawei, noting that the defence industry was a primary target. Another former senior US intelligence official said the threat of illegal eavesdropping may be more theoretical than actual.

On Monday, House Intelligence Committee Chairman Mike Rogers referred to alleged instances of “beaconing” of information to China, though he did not name any specific users of Huawei’s equipment that had been affected.

When asked for examples of such unauthorised transfer of information stored on a network, the staff member referred to an incident involving wireless operator Cricket, which is the operating subsidiary of Leap Wireless International. Cricket uses Huawei to deploy its wireless network.

In May, unusual activity was observed on a Cricket network node in San Antonio, Texas, while Huawei equipment was being used there, the staff member said. According to this account, there was concern that information from the network was being sent without authorisation to China.

Greg Lund, a spokesman for Cricket, said that some of its computers had been infected with viruses earlier this year, and an investigation revealed they were related to Huawei personnel working in the company’s facilities. However, the investigation found no evidence that Cricket or its customers’ proprietary or confidential information had been accessed, Lund said.

“There is no evidence suggesting that these incidents were the result of malicious activity on the part of Huawei,” he said, adding that Cricket was not contacted by the committee during the course of its investigation, and the company did not complain to the committee.

William Plummer, a Huawei spokesman in Washington, recounted a San Antonio incident in a conference call with reporters on Monday, without naming Cricket or Leap.

He said that two independent security experts “were able to identify to the moment that that laptop was infected with a virus by a WiFi access point at that Texas hotel”.

“Those are facts and to the extent the committee has any familiarity with those facts, then they also know that they have misrepresented them,” said Plummer, a Huawei vice-president for external affairs.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or