• Thu
  • Dec 18, 2014
  • Updated: 4:07am
BusinessEconomy
EURO-ZONE CRISIS

Europe's Plan C for Greece no better than previous plans

The deal between euro-zone finance chiefs and IMF welcome but lacks adequate debt relief

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 29 November, 2012, 2:22am
UPDATED : Thursday, 29 November, 2012, 3:46am

Europe's leaders have reached Plan C in their efforts to rescue Greece. Unfortunately, it lacks a crucial element also absent in plans A and B: adequate debt relief.

The agreement between euro-zone finance ministers and the International Monetary Fund is welcome and overdue. It provides much-needed support for a Greek government that has taken enormous political risks to meet the conditions for aid.

It also puts an end to bickering between Europe and the IMF over how to cover Greece's funding shortfall - a delay that had threatened to undermine faith in the bailout programme, even among Greeks who believe in making the changes and sacrifices demanded.

The deal, however, does not do enough to address the biggest issue: a government debt burden that, at about 170 per cent of gross domestic product, remains unbearable under any reasonable scenario.

It  assumes that Greece will largely grow its way out of the problem, reducing its debt to less than 110 per cent of GDP by 2022 even as it endures the crushing austerity required to sustain a budget surplus of 4 per cent of GDP.

In other words, this is just the latest in a long line of stopgap measures to fend off the kind of disorderly default and euro exit that could trigger contagion in the much larger economies of Spain and Italy.

Germany and other creditor nations refused to consider the simpler and effective solution of writing off some of Greece's debt to official lenders, a move that would amount to an explicit fiscal transfer. Instead, they agreed to reduce Greece's debt-service costs, extend its repayment period and lend it money to buy back bonds held by private investors. Taken together, these measures are supposed to amount to debt relief equivalent to about 20 per cent of GDP by 2020.

The IMF, for its part, relaxed its previous requirement that Greece get its debt down to 120 per cent of GDP by 2020.

The contortions might be necessary to help the deal get through the various national parliaments that must ratify it, but they could extract a higher price down the road.

Some euro-zone countries, for example, will now be paying more to borrow money than they receive in interest from Greece. That is a fiscal transfer by sleight of hand, as is the 10-year extension of some debt maturities and a repayment holiday on loans that the European Union and the IMF pledged earlier this year.

Perversely, much of the burden will fall on countries that are also in economic trouble. Italy and Spain, for example, will have to pay Greece for the privilege of lending to it, because their financing costs are higher than the reduced interest rate at which Greece will borrow.

The debt buy-back from private investors, too, promises to be problematic. The idea is that the low market price of Greece's debt creates an opportunity to retire it on the cheap, by borrowing new money to buy old bonds.

If, for example, Greece can buy back its bonds at 33 cents per euro of face value, it can get rid of about €3 in debt for each new euro it borrows. Problem is, the price of the bonds tends to rise as markets come to expect the buy-back, eroding the benefits to Greece. The country's 10-year bonds now trade at almost 36 cents on the euro, up from about 31 cents early  last month.

In a clumsy attempt to ensure the buy-back's benefits, the bailout stipulates that Greece cannot pay more than the closing price of its bonds on November 23. As a result, the government might not be able to find investors willing to sell their bonds at its offer price - an outcome that could jeopardise the release of the IMF's €43.7 billion (HK$438 billion) share of the bailout money, which is contingent on the completion of the buy-back.

The euro's initial bounce from the deal announcement has faded as this reality has sunk in among investors.

Perhaps the biggest difference between Plan C and its predecessors is that responsibility for failure has shifted. Previously, Greece shouldered the blame for its inability to come to grips with the task at hand. Now, the creditors' plan itself is more likely to be the sole culprit.

German Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble seemed to acknowledge its flaws on Tuesday, saying that if the buy-back failed, the troika - the IMF, the European Commission and the European Central Bank - would have to take "other measures".

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or