Advertisement
Business
The View
Richard Wong

How identity divides America: the Democratic transformation

3-MIN READ3-MIN
File photo from 2006 shows General Motors Pontiac G-6 cars lined up for delivery at the Orion assembly plant in Michigan - a rust belt state narrowly won by Donald Trump in the election. Many of the forgotten white underclass had already gravitated to the Republican Party before the election. Photo: AFP
Richard Wong Yue-chim is the Philip Wong Kennedy Wong Professor in Political Economy at the University of Hong Kong

In over 180 years of existence, the Democratic Party of the United States has completed a remarkable ideological and geographic transformation.

Originally a staunch defender of Southern slavery, the party now wins the support of most non-white voters. Once an advocate of rural interests against coastal elites, the party now draws much of its strength from cities and coastal areas.

Oddly enough, the party had its roots in the so-called Republican Party of Thomas Jefferson and James Madison (1800-24), which was formed to oppose the Federalist Party run by Alexander Hamilton.

Advertisement

It underwent a number of changes in direction that teetered between identity politics and economics.

In 1830, the party formed under the populist wing led by President Andrew Jackson, who introduced the Indian Removal Act to force Indians from their homes. This was later followed by support for the idea of “manifest destiny” that asserted (white) Americans were divinely entitled to the North American continent, and for the defence of slavery.

Advertisement

From the late 1800s to the end of World War Two, the party defended farmers against big-city capitalists and supported the active use of government to try to improve people’s lives. This culminated in the sweeping New Deal under President Franklin Roosevelt.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Select Speed
1.00x