• Tue
  • Dec 23, 2014
  • Updated: 3:16pm
CommentInsight & Opinion

Xi, India's Modi and Indonesia's Widodo lead pragmatists' rise

Kishore Mahbubani says China's Xi and the likely new leaders of India and Indonesia know that, to achieve rapid economic growth and modernisation, they will need to compromise

PUBLISHED : Friday, 25 April, 2014, 6:19pm
UPDATED : Saturday, 26 April, 2014, 3:03am

More than one-third of the world's population lives in just three countries: China, India and Indonesia. With all three undergoing significant political transitions, this is a decisive moment in shaping the global economy's future.

If Narendra Modi and Joko Widodo win the upcoming elections in India and Indonesia, respectively, they will join Chinese President Xi Jinping in spurring regional economic growth - likely causing Asia's rise to global economic pre-eminence to occur faster than the world ever imagined.

In the year since Xi assumed the Chinese presidency, he has centralised power to a remarkable degree. Not only has he positioned himself as general secretary of the Chinese Communist Party and chairman of the Central Military Commission, he has also neutralised potential rivals, including former Chongqing party boss Bo Xilai and former security chief Zhou Yongkang .

Consolidating power in a country as large and messy as China is extremely difficult, making Xi's accomplishment remarkable, to say the least. But it is only a first step. Xi is now attempting to use this power to push through the difficult reforms that Hu Jintao and his prime minister, Wen Jiabao , have been widely criticised for neglecting.

Xi knows that he must be pragmatic in his reform efforts. First, he must build a national consensus capable of overcoming the powerful vested interests that oppose changes - including the dissolution of monopolies, improved market regulation, increased transparency and tax reform - that would level the country's economic playing field.

While Western leaders generally support Xi's market-oriented reform strategy, they remain puzzled by his devotion to the Communist Party. To the Western mind, any truly effective reformer must be a closet democrat, like the Soviet Union's last president, Mikhail Gorbachev.

But Xi has no intention of being the People's Republic's last president, and the Soviet Union's collapse in the wake of Gorbachev's political reforms taught him the importance of balancing change with stability. For Xi, the Communist Party's appeal lies not so much in its ideology as in its capacity to help bolster China's prosperity. Indeed, China's current leaders are modernising nationalists, not communists. They recognise that China's success over the last three decades is a direct result of its shift towards a more open economy and a freer society - a shift that will continue under Xi.

Another modernising nationalist, Modi, is likely to become India's prime minister following the elections that started this month. Modi's pro-business approach is a major theme of his election campaign, and ordinary Indians are hopeful that his policies will enhance their well-being.

As chief minister of Gujarat, Modi worked to encourage foreign investment, provide around-the-clock electricity, build roads, and engage in intelligent urban planning. Annual economic growth in the state averaged more than 10 per cent from 2006 to 2012.

But history haunts Modi's campaign - namely, the deaths of more than 1,000 people in anti-Muslim riots in Gujarat in 2002. Though the Supreme Court cleared him of all personal wrongdoing, the tragedy's legacy persists, making it difficult for Modi to win Muslim votes without alienating his Hindu nationalist base.

This has not prevented Modi from taking political risks, beginning with his assertion that India needs toilets more than temples. But his decision to run for prime minister is by far his riskiest move, as it will test his national appeal.

Of course, even if he wins, Modi will never be able to consolidate power to the degree that Xi has, owing to India's separation of powers and democratic constitution. At best, he will lead a coalition government, in which his capacity to make compromises and connect with unlikely allies will dictate his success.

Widodo, the governor of Jakarta, will face a similar challenge if he wins Indonesia's presidential election in July, given that his party, the Indonesian Democratic Party of Struggle, will not have a majority in parliament. Fortunately, he is a skilled politician - popular, but not populist, with tremendous persuasive powers.

These qualities enable Widodo to deliver results, exemplified in his success in convincing Jakarta's slum dwellers to leave their shanties to allow for urban development. Under his leadership, highway projects that had been blocked for 16 years have been relaunched in the city.

Like Xi and Modi, Widodo is focused mainly on economic development. In this regard, his background as a furniture manufacturer and exporter is a major asset, enabling him to bring a level of hands-on knowledge and experience that past Indonesian presidents have lacked. Widodo understands that Indonesia must improve its logistical capabilities if its economy is to engage the world.

Perhaps most important, Xi, Modi and Widodo are all pragmatists. They know that, in order to achieve rapid economic growth and modernisation, they will need to compromise with opposition forces at home and adopt best practices from abroad. Their shared desire to engage the modern world suggests that their leadership will improve the lives of their countries' citizens. And better lives for one-third of the world's population will benefit the rest of us as well.

Kishore Mahbubani, dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore, is the author of The Great Convergence: Asia, the West, and the Logic of One World. Copyright: Project Syndicate

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
4

This article is now closed to comments

Mikado
Geez! If being pragmatic is to arrange for the slaughter of thousands of Muslims in Gujarat as an exercise of raw and senseless power, Mr Modi is becoming as pragmatic as the Hitlers and Hirohitos. Mr Modi the Butcher of Gujarat is no pragmatic but a racist religious agitator, a threat to the very fabric of the civil society of India. As Indian PM you can be sure his "pragmatism" will result in countless religious riots and pogroms. Is Kishore Mahbubani, dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy at the National University of Singapore pulling our legs or has his school of public policy degraded into the school of public ****ology?
535b13f5-31c8-45cc-bc2e-52c30a3209cb
modi cannot sit together with xi jin ping or widodo, because xi communist non coorrupt, widodow lives lives with th poor with simplicity. modi is arrogant rude, captures land from poor and gives it to corporates for low price. and more over he is a killer of a vast number of people(1000s in few2 or 3 days) in his own state. another time he innocent in the name of terrorism just for a public simpathy.
321manu
History may show that Xi had to backslide first, before becoming the reformer that many enthusiastically thought he would be during his ascension. However, we must be deep in the "backslide" phase, cuz those thoughts of reform seem like a fantasy right about now.
dunndavid
Modi is certainly someone that looks likely to modernize the Indian economy. According to the article Widodo is too. What of Xi Jinping? No evidence so far.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or