Thailand’s army was just biding its time under pro-Thaksin rule

Mark Thompson says coup could signal the start of a bloody suppression

PUBLISHED : Monday, 26 May, 2014, 7:09pm
UPDATED : Tuesday, 27 May, 2014, 2:04am

While international condemnation of last Thursday's military coup in Thailand has been strong, it is often assumed that the military had to act to break an intractable deadlock in Thai politics. But the military has never been neutral in the fight between the upstart former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra and the traditional elite in big business, the bureaucracy, the courts and the monarchy.

The coup-maker-in-chief, army head Prayuth Chan-ocha, is a staunch royalist who served in an elite infantry unit known as the Queen's Guard. He has well-known links with other key members of this elite unit, former defence minister General Prawit Wongsuwan and ex-army commander General Anupong Paochinda.

Prawit and Anupong were said to have helped plan the crackdown on the pro-Thaksin "red-shirt" protests in mid-2010 that left nearly 100 dead. They are also widely believed to have close ties to the People's Democratic Reform Committee that has led the anti-government protests in Bangkok over the past six months.

This is the third military intervention since Thaksin won an overwhelming electoral victory in 2001, thanks to his pro-poor campaign promises. A coup in 2006 was unable to stop pro-Thaksin forces from winning elections the following year. Undeterred, the army stepped in again to force a change of government, this time behind the scenes in late 2008 after the occupation of Bangkok's international airport by anti-Thaksin forces.

Thaksin's party easily won elections in 2011 despite Prayuth's public warning to vote only for "good people". The new government of Yingluck Shinawatra, Thaksin's sister, was careful not to antagonise the military. But Prayuth appears to have just been biding his time.

An effort to grant Thaksin amnesty from a corruption conviction sparked large street protests that began late last year. When that failed to unseat the government, which called elections instead, the polls were nullified by anti-government courts, which also unseated Yingluck as prime minister on a flimsy charge this month.

When the pro-Thaksin government still refused to resign, martial law was declared. It seemed to have been a carefully calculated ruse to lure out otherwise wary politicians, who were all arrested after only two days of "negotiations" really aimed at forcing them from power. As of writing, about 150 high-ranking officials have been detained, though Yingluck, who was arrested alongside other cabinet members, has reportedly been released. Protest leader and former Democrat secretary general Suthep Thaugsuban was also arrested to give the appearance of even-handedness. But enthusiastic support for the coup by anti-government protesters tells a different story, suggesting a coup is what they had been waiting for all along.

Parallels being drawn by some traditional elite leaders to the Egyptian military coup last year point to an ominous scenario to eliminate the pro-Thaksin camp through the massive use of force, much in the way the Muslim Brotherhood has been bloodily repressed in Egypt.

Some "yellow-shirt" supporters, disappointed by Western criticism of their anti-democratic protests and now the military coup, have also threatened to turn to China for support should the West try to isolate them.

The Thai coup is a big step backward, damaging democracy in a country which held a series of competitive elections after decades of rapid economic growth. There are also potential regional implications, as Thailand's undemocratic military rulers may be tempted to look more to China, itself facing growing isolation over its controversial maritime territorial claims.

Mark R. Thompson is director of the Southeast Asia Research Centre at the City University of Hong Kong