• Thu
  • Dec 18, 2014
  • Updated: 12:25pm
CommentInsight & Opinion

Hong Kong needs to outlaw growing practice of upskirting

Su-Mei Thompson and Lisa Moore say Hong Kong must stamp out upskirting, an outrage based on the stereotype of women as sexual prey

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 31 July, 2014, 12:30pm
UPDATED : Friday, 01 August, 2014, 1:43am

Upskirting - the act of photographing or videoing up a woman's dress or skirt - has recently captured the limelight in Hong Kong. Although this sort of deviant behaviour is not new, the internet and social media have created a new set of concerns about sexual voyeurism, given the scope for images to go viral.

In Hong Kong, there were over 110 reported incidents of upskirting last year, up from the 78 reports in 2011 and 101 reports in 2012.

There is currently no law in Hong Kong that specifically addresses the secret taking of images. Offenders can potentially be prosecuted under loitering laws or public order laws, while the offence of outraging public decency is harder to prove.

While the rates of prosecution and conviction are generally very low, last year a property development company employee was jailed for three months for secretly filming people at a show home with a mobile phone hidden in a paper box. More recently earlier this year, an anaesthesiologist at Queen Mary Hospital who was caught filming upskirt videos of female students was put on 18 months' probation.

Other countries have been more resolute about passing legislation to outlaw upskirting. Earlier this year, Kyoto passed a newly revised ordinance banning surreptitious filming in public places. Australia and New Zealand are among the countries that have legislation specifically targeting upskirting.

However, even with direct legal protection, laws are often an inadequate means to tackle the issue, especially as recording devices used by tech-savvy perverts have become more sophisticated.

This has motivated some countries to take a more creative approach. Japan has developed special panty fabric engineered to repel infrared rays. Meanwhile, South Korea requires camera-equipped phones to make a 65-decibel sound whenever a picture is taken.

Hong Kong, too, is taking practical steps to discourage upskirting. The Central Library and PMQ, among other public buildings, have installed panels and opaque stickers on glass walls and staircases where women are more vulnerable.

At The Women's Foundation, we hope Hongkongers will consider concerted efforts to actively tackle upskirting - and sexual harassment as a whole. Legislation that specifically targets upskirting and penalises the distribution of offensive images would send a clear message to predators and perverts that this type of behaviour is not condoned. Companies should review and eradicate security camera black spots within their premises and have clear zero-tolerance harassment policies. Individuals can join global movements like Hollaback that raise awareness to help end sexual harassment and encourage victims to speak up about their experiences.

At the core of upskirting is a repellent reinforcement of the stereotype of women as sexual prey. Where images by which they can be identified are posted online, it humiliates them publicly. All people should have a reasonable expectation of privacy in public places when it comes to their own bodies and that this right will be upheld.

Su-Mei Thompson is CEO and Lisa Moore is research and advocacy manager at The Women's Foundation. This article is part of a monthly series on gender issues developed in collaboration with the foundation

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 

This article is now closed to comments

53de11dd-a654-4b5a-b03b-3e5b0a3209cb
I am still worry about Hong Kong after the British left. I had a friend from Hong Kong College that wanted any computer software type job he could get in order to stay in the USA. I was on the 707 aircraft with lots of electronics on board to get bombs dropped on downtown Hanio North Viet Nam where the Russians had built anti aircraft @ SAM sites along side of schools- hospital so the USA couldn't bomb them. But supposedly we could hit within 50 feet of the target. We where told not to turn our aircraft because it might BLANK our antennas. One day we where heading due north when we told the pilot not to turn. That was when we flew into mainland COMMUNIST RED China at about 30,000 feet straight @ level at stall plus 10 knots about 165 knots to save fuel. Two MIGS came up to look us, but the carrier in the Gulf of Tonkin had launched 2 F-4's @ at full afterburner @ at 50 KM inside the country the 2 MIGS where shot down. The F-4's returned to the carrier because of fuel problems. But we had not finished communicating with the fighter -bomber in its radar controlled decent to the target, so we had to continue for another 50 KM inside the country until (weapons release was called). Then at 100 KM inside Red China we told the pilot he could turn @ still at stall plus 10 we exited the country. The communist didn't complain but this (to save face) but complained about us overflying the Paracel islands a 1000 times between d Gulf of Tonkin @ Taiwan, - my son @ live in wife, Leroy

Login

SCMP.com Account

or