Advertisement
OpinionBlogs

Locustland | What Obama, Romney will say about China in foreign policy debate

A total of only 15 minutes will have been devoted solely to discussion of China policy following this fourth and final debate.

Reading Time:3 minutes
Why you can trust SCMP

Less than 24 hours until the third and final debate before the 2012 presidential election, set for November 9, and candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney look to be tied.
"The Rise of China and Tomorrow’s World", one of the topics laid out by moderator Bob Schieffer, will likely address the shifting power balance in Asia, but also the different facets to the United States and China's complex economic relationship: US debt owned by China, accusations of currency manipulation, as well as human rights.
Advertisement
However, voters will go to polls with only 15 out of 360 minutes through four debates having been given solely to discussion of the most-important relationship between the two nations, far less than many feel the subject deserves. China not only figured heavily in campaign ads, but also illustrates one of the sharpest differences between the two candidates, showing a Republican who appeals to the labour vote and a Democrat turning to the business community.
While Obama has the advantage of being an incumbent president with an inside view of current foreign policy debates, Romney's China-bashing rhetoric is effective ammunition against Obama, even if there's little reason to believe Romney would be able to follow through on his tough talk.
Advertisement
Given China's pursuit of free-market capitalism over the past 30 years, it stands to reason that the free trade candidate is the one Beijing wants:

Traditionally, Republicans have favored free trade, free enterprise, and less regulation -- qualities more or less compatible with China's present state economic philosophy of development, investment, trade, entrepreneurship, and efficiency -- not to mention a shared concern over the economic risk of curbing climate change.

Since the two countries established an official relationship in 1979, their overall relations have been better when Republicans have been in power. The logic is simple: no delusion from the outset, fewer human rights distractions, frank talk, and concrete cooperation whenever possible. This plain dealing tends to stabilize China-U.S. bilateral relations, as it avoids speculation and gaming.

Advertisement
Select Voice
Choose your listening speed
Get through articles 2x faster
1.25x
250 WPM
Slow
Average
Fast
1.25x