• Tue
  • Jul 29, 2014
  • Updated: 10:40pm
Blogs
PUBLISHED : Thursday, 02 May, 2013, 9:55am
UPDATED : Friday, 03 May, 2013, 11:42am

ZTE: destined to follow Motorola, Nortel?

ZTE's latest results reflect a dire situation at the company, while Huawei looks better positioned to survive the current sector downturn

BIO

Doug Young has lived and worked in China for 15 years, much of that as a journalist for Reuters writing about Chinese companies. He currently lives in Shanghai where he teaches financial journalism at Fudan University. He writes daily on his blog, Young’s China Business Blog (www.youngchinabiz.com), commenting on the latest developments at Chinese companies listed in the US, China and Hong Kong. He is also author of a new book about the media in China, “The Party Line: How the Media Dictates Public Opinion in Modern China.”
 

The latest numbers and outlook from telecoms equipment maker ZTE (0763.HK; Shenzhen: 000063) look decidedly ugly, leading me to wonder if the struggling former superstar is destined either for extinction or a radical makeover in the next few years. ZTE's woes come as crosstown rival Huawei faces similar challenges due to a rapidly slowing global market for networking equipment. Huawei is responding to the challenge by aiming for big new orders in Australia, and is also discussing its succession plans as media-shy founder Ren Zhengfei nears his retirement. Whoever Ren ultimately chooses to replace him with will certainly have a difficult job ahead, as Huawei could easily follow the same path as ZTE, which itself appears to be on the edge of a downward spiral like those followed by defunct former giants Motorola and Nortel.

Let's start with a look at ZTE, which issued a press release about its first-quarter results with the misleading headline that its profit rose 36 per cent, driven by strength in its operational review.  A closer look at the company's actual first-quarter results paints quite a different picture, with the profit jump all attributable to one-time gains from asset sales.

While the 36 per cent profit rise is indeed accurate, ZTE actually reported a net loss of about 615 million yuan (US$100 million) after excluding one-time gains like the recent sale of two major assets. The quarterly loss compared with an 89 million yuan profit a year earlier on a comparable basis, and followed a 1.1 billion yuan net loss in the fourth quarter of last year. Revenue didn't look much better, dropping 2.8 per cent to 18.1 billion yuan despite a surge in ZTE's fast-growing smartphone business.

ZTE's outlook for the rest of the year was rather vague, but also wasn't too encouraging. The company said its main new business in the next quarter will come from broadband upgrades to existing networks, which typically earn much less revenue than the sale of new equipment. That means we can probably expect to see more operating losses for at least the next two quarters, and probably net losses as well as ZTE runs out of assets to sell.

ZTE could see some improvement towards the end of the year, when China's three telcos are expected to embark on a multibillion-dollar spending spree on new networks after the telecoms regulator issues 4G licenses. But it will still have to compete with Huawei and the other big global players for those 4G contracts, which brings me back to my previous assertion that ZTE's days as a major global telecoms equipment maker could be limited.

From ZTE, let's move on to Huawei, which is saying it hopes to win US$2 billion in 4G contracts in Australia as it bids to build a new network for Optus, one of the country's major carriers and a unit of Singaporean giant SingTel (Singapore: STEL). The news comes less than a month after Australian Prime Minister Julia Gillard clarified that Huawei and ZTE were welcome to sell to her country's commercial telcos, even though they wouldn't be allowed to bid for contracts for more sensitive government networks. 

In a separate report citing an internal company memo, Huawei founder Ren Zhengfei discusses his succession plans, saying the company's next chief won't be one of his family members. That appears to rule out his son and daughter as future heads of the company, even though both are both active at Huawei. Huawei's situation isn't quite as dire as ZTE's, and the fact that it may win the Optus contracts shows that it can still be quite competitive in lucrative western markets like Australia. Still, whoever succeeds Ren could easily find himself at the helm of a very different company from the present Huawei when the leadership handover takes place in the next few years.

Bottom line: ZTE's latest results reflect a dire situation at the company, while Huawei looks better positioned to survive the current sector downturn.

Correction: in the second paragraph, "revenue" corrected to "review" on May 3.

To read more commentaries from Doug Young, visit youngchinabiz.com

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

2

This article is now closed to comments

edelman_hk
This blog post refers to ZTE's press release on April 26, headlined "ZTE First-Quarter Net Profit Rises 35.9% as Operational Review Drives Rebound.” The press release can be Google’d and is on ZTE’s corporate website. There was nothing in the press release, not least the headline, that attributed the increase in profit to revenue. It appears the writer of this blog misread the headline. (Review/Revenue)
Instead, the press release explicitly cited “the disposal gain” as one of the reasons for the increase in profit. It’s unfortunate for the writer of this blog to say erroneously that ZTE used a “misleading headline” to connect the profit increase with revenue, when the company was already fully transparent and provided detailed information on how the profit increase was achieved.
It’s hard for readers to accept the conclusions of this blog, as its central premise is undermined by the writer’s mistaken view on the way ZTE presented its financial results. When a writer attempts to make a far-fetched hypothesis of this sort, it is helpful to first check the facts.
wang.feng
Thank you for bringing this to our attention. We have corrected the typo, but we don't believe this error undermines the rest of the story, and we stand by it.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or