Advertisement
Members of The Hong Kong Journalists Association, Staffs of Ming Pao and supporters hold a banner displaying "They Can't Kill Us All" march from Central Government Offices to police headquarters in support of press freedom. Photo: K. Y. Cheng

I seldom wear black. But I have this black T-shirt I put on two times a year – once for the Tiananmen Square Massacre commemoration on 4 June and the other for the pro-democracy protest on 1 July. Over the years, this T-shirt, the only piece of black clothing I own, has come to symbolise both sadness and discontent.

Since C.Y. Leung moved into the Government House in 2012, I have been wearing my black T-shirt a lot more often. If it wasn’t for a mass protest against the national education curriculum, it was for a demonstration in support of HKTV’s bid for a broadcasting license. There seems to be plenty of sadness and discontent to go around these days. Yesterday morning, I found myself once again rummaging through the closet looking for my protestor’s uniform, this time to defend the future of our press freedom. With a heavy heart, I slipped the black thing over my head and made my way to Tamar.

What happened this past Wednesday has shocked the city to the core. Kevin Lau, former editor-in-chief of Ming Pao – one of the city’s major Chinese language newspapers – was attacked by two knifemen on his way to breakfast in Sai Wan Ho. We don’t know which is worse: that Lau was stabbed six times in his back and legs, or that it took place in public and in broad daylight. The assault reeks of the brazenness we expect only in the Mexican drug war or a turf battle between rival gangs in Russia. It makes Hong Kong, one of the safest international cities in the world, look like a lawless backwater.

Violence against the press is not unheard of in our city. There were a handful of high profile incidents in the past two decades. In May 1996, for instance, tabloid magazine publisher Leung Tin Wai had his left forearm and both thumbs chopped off by attackers right in his office. Two years later in 1998, an equally vicious attack left Albert Cheng, outspoken businessman and politician, hospitalised for two months. Just last year, Chen Ping of iSun Affairs, Jimmy Lai of the Apple Daily and Shih Wing Ching of AM730 were either attacked or issued death threats. As recently as last month, firebrand radio talk show host Tam Tak Chi, better known by his nickname Fast Beat, was roughed up by a group of men outside his studio.
Former Ming Pao chief editor Kevin Lau Chun-to (left) meets media  in Eastern Hospital after spending three days in intensive care. Photo: SCMP Pictures
Former Ming Pao chief editor Kevin Lau Chun-to (left) meets media in Eastern Hospital after spending three days in intensive care. Photo: SCMP Pictures

These violent episodes all have one thing in common: the crime never gets solved. Despite offers of multi-million dollar rewards, the bad guys aren’t caught and the police investigation simply goes cold after a few months. Even if the police manage to capture the assailants, perhaps with the help of eyewitnesses and security cameras, they won’t find out who the mastermind behind the attack is, ever. In this day and age, a text message and the target’s headshot are all it takes to order a hit. Anonymity has emboldened the cowardly; technology has enabled the mercenary. That puts journalists – people who make their living upsetting the apple cart – in an ever vulnerable position.

When the police can’t or won’t do much to progress the investigation, the burden falls back on the shoulders of the journalists themselves. Ming Pao staff is currently sifting through dozens of news stories overseen by Kevin Lau before he was let go by the newspaper in January (his termination is a whole other story) to identify what might have gotten the editor in trouble. Among the possible culprits, the one that has generated the most interest is Lau’s exposé about offshore assets stashed away by Beijing’s ruling elite. Written in collaboration with the International Consortium of Investigative Journalists (ICIJ), the story is believed to have ticked off some powerful big wigs up north. So far, the ICIJ has found no evidence linking the attack to the investigative report and so the guessing game continues.

Advertisement