• Tue
  • Sep 16, 2014
  • Updated: 1:01pm
CommentInsight & Opinion

Restraint needed on China-bashing during US election

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 20 September, 2012, 12:00am
UPDATED : Thursday, 20 September, 2012, 7:02pm

China-bashing is a well-established standby for US election candidates, which hasn't done much for mutual understanding, even if it hasn't done lasting damage. For example, former president Bill Clinton did it on the campaign trail in 1992 but later backed China's entry into the World Trade Organisation. In the current race for the White House, Republican challenger Mitt Romney has gone one better, if that is the word, by pledging to risk a trade war on his first day in office by declaring China a currency manipulator.

If that day comes, he would appear more statesmanlike if he forgot he ever said it.

Meanwhile, a close election race has forced President Barack Obama to act in response to Romney's jibes that he is soft on China. The timing and place of his response, while campaigning in the electoral swing state of Ohio, is testament to the political factor.

Romney is talking tough for the benefit of a domestic audience, but Obama has played it by the book by laying a complaint with the WTO. It charges that China illegally subsidises its car-parts exporters, which compete with a key sector of Ohio's industrial base. It remains to be seen whether the issue is considered worthy of a hearing under multilateral trade rules.

We trust Obama will not be tempted to stray from those rules and that Romney will show more restraint if the presidential race looks tight in key industrial states, where job losses are blamed on competition from China with the advantage of an allegedly undervalued currency.

There are good reasons for this. Sino-US relations are navigating a sensitive course between renewed US strategic commitment to the region, and tensions between China and its neighbours over competing territorial claims. A serious trade dispute could knock them off course.

China is also going through a sensitive once-in-a-decade leadership transition at the same time as it tries to nudge its economy onto a sustainable growth path through greater domestic consumption and less reliance on exports and investment.

Trade tensions that strengthen protectionist tendencies can do nothing to smooth the path of economic reform, or of global economic recovery. It is not smart politics in the long run to aggravate them unnecessarily for electoral advantage.


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

What with China bashing the US ambassador's car in Beijing this week, this hardly seems possible. Imagine the rage and threats from Beijing if this happened to the Chinese ambassador's car in Washington DC....most likely the usual threat from Ministry of Foreign Affairs - "we will not be held responsible for the actions we take...."
Look at the matter positively. Things would be much worse if U.S. politicians i) actually understood how Chinese state capitalism works sufficiently to make accurate criticisms and ii) bothered gaze upward from their navels long enough to learn about China to the same degree that Chinese have learned about the U.S. Judging by past performance, the chances of that look slim.
The Mittster, however, is a fast learner who may have helped manage companies invested in Chinese JVs and, so, may already be more knowledgeable than thought. On the other hand, Obama seems Hellbent on going "whole hog" into the business of state capitalism, himself, making it a tad difficult to complain to the WPO about the cadres' Promethian-scaled version of it.


SCMP.com Account