• Thu
  • Sep 18, 2014
  • Updated: 6:32am
CommentInsight & Opinion

What future for Hong Kong if the majority are silenced?

Lau Nai-keung says a lynch-mob mentality is gagging true free speech

PUBLISHED : Friday, 26 October, 2012, 12:00am
UPDATED : Friday, 26 October, 2012, 7:40am

Recently many of my friends have told me they are deeply worried about our kids. If they are taught to hate their country, thinking that they are not Chinese, waving the British flag, and even openly taking an anti-China stance on international issues, what is going to happen to them in a few years when they will have to face up to reality?

What will happen to Hong Kong when it has alienated itself from 1.3 billion people up north? How long will this anti-China brainwashing last? What will be the damage?

Like the Cultural Revolution, which we all hate, the crimson phobia sweeping across our education system is pitting students against their parents and even against their own schools. It has filled our media and monopolised our attention. It seems no one has been spared. Verbal violence that would be banned as hate speech in many countries - including the champion of free speech, the US - has become the norm here.

Anyone who dares to express an opinion that deviates from this anti-China, anti-government "intrinsic truth" will see their views silenced or twisted. Those very few whose views our dissidents cannot completely banish become targets of a lynch-mob mentality.

Elsie Leung Oi-sie, the former secretary for justice and current vice-chairperson of the Basic Law Committee, came under scathing attack by Martin Lee Chu-ming and others - the chorus was later joined even by the Law Society and the Bar Association - after Leung spoke at an event on October 6.

According to the Bar Association, she made references to the Ng Ka-ling judgment of the Court of Final Appeal in 1999 and said that the legal profession in Hong Kong, including judges, had a poor understanding of Hong Kong's relationship with the central government.

She was also reported to have said that if the judges had the correct and necessary understanding, mistakes would not have been made. According to news reports, Leung also said that in relation to the issue of mainland women giving birth in Hong Kong, her preferred solution was for the chief executive to seek an interpretation of the Basic Law by the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress.

Such a perfectly innocuous suggestion was deemed to be "undermining the authority and standing of the Court of Final Appeal and likely damage the rule of law in Hong Kong", and flogged in the media, with the poor lady pleading for her freedom of speech.

Meanwhile, the anti-national education campaign groups that occupied the new government headquarters for days seem to believe they have a monopoly on the right to protest there.

When some pro-national education groups applied to demonstrate there on the evening of October 17, their opponents not only followed suit, but accused national education supporters of barging in and picking a fight. The truth is, as records clearly show, that the supporters had applied and obtained police consent days before. During that night, guess who picked the fight.

In any case, the spiral of silence is now broken. The silent majority are now gradually venturing out to voice their opinions and concerns.

Although the dissidents have practically monopolised the mainstream media, and suffocated the opposition, in this information age there are many unconventional channels and there is simply no way for any group, not even the government, to silence any dissenting voice.

In group e-mails and WhatsApp messages, tweets and microblogs, Facebook pages, personal blogs and public forums, different opinions are beginning to surface, more by the day. People are crying out: we sick and tired of this nonsense - it is time for it to stop.

I have insisted all along that, in the information age, there is simply no way to brainwash people. National education and even the mystical Chinese Communist Party can never achieve this end, and fortunately, neither can our dissidents and their white-gloved backers.

The battle continues, but it is not completely lopsided anymore.

Lau Nai-keung is a member of the Basic Law Committee of the NPC Standing Committee, and also a member of the Commission on Strategic Development

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

15

This article is now closed to comments

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or