• Sat
  • Jul 26, 2014
  • Updated: 11:31am
PUBLISHED : Friday, 28 December, 2012, 12:00am
UPDATED : Friday, 28 December, 2012, 3:31am

Middle Kingdom in a race for the centre

BIO

Bonny Schoonakker has worked as a journalist in South Africa, Europe and, now, Asia, reporting on war and peace, and everything in between, for more than 30 years. Despite being in newspapers for an uncomfortable length of time, he feels he still has a lot to learn and cannot shake off the suspicion that you are only as good as your next story, no matter how good your last one. However, he does know that truth is a lie’s best cover, and remains constantly on the alert.
 

At this stage of China's history there is something wonderfully resonant about Beijing's determination to acquire a satellite-based navigation system with its Beidou programme.

This week Beidou passed another milestone, when the service was offered for the first time to paying customers in the Asia-Pacific region, to which its system of at least 15 satellites in orbit is currently restricted.

Beidou, which takes its name from the Big Dipper - an important navigational beacon in ancient times - still has a long way to go before it can rival the American GPS system, which has 30 satellites providing a service that covers the entire globe for free.

Beidou was once a partner in the European Union's own Galileo system, which will also be offered for free once it gets running. But China's involvement lasted only until the strategic implications of this became clear to the European Commission in early 2008.

Strategic considerations are also the probable reasons for China's exclusion from Russia's Glonass system or India's attempt to establish a system of its own, called IRNSS, which is hoped to provide a regional service by 2014.

The uninterrupted stream of successful rocket launches by China in recent years should encourage its rivals in the race for space to believe that Beidou will become a global system by its target date of 2020, which was approved in 2003. Two months ago we reported that those involved in Beidou were worried that Beijing's new leadership may not approve the continuation of their programme, but those fears are probably misplaced, if you consider the prestige attached to the satellite systems by the world powers trying to set them up.

Indeed, to this day China still calls itself the Middle Kingdom, the most central of all nations under heaven. Unfortunately after it lost its superpower status to Britain and other powers a few centuries ago, China also lost its position as the Middle Kingdom - literally. You can see this for yourself by taking a look at a GPS receiver when next in Beijing. If China is the Middle Kingdom, how come zero degrees latitude does not run down the north-south axis on which the city was built, but instead through a town in a country far to the west - at least for now, anyway?

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

2

This article is now closed to comments

taihang
Firstly, it is zero degrees longitude, not latitude (that would be the equator). And, if zero degrees longitude runs through London, are you implying that the UK is the centre of the world? Of course not, it is simply a historical artifact, as is the name of China.
Interestingly, every nation mentioned appears to be making strategic decisions in setting up their satellite networks, but China is only credited with doing it for prestige reasons. GPS receivers are the compasses of todays world, controlling the signals they rely on is the equivalent of controlling the magnetic poles and visibility of the stars in times past. Seems pretty crucial to me.
docomo
Hopefully the Middle Kingdom will emerge once more; not as a zero number on a geographical grid; but a beacon of civilization, freedom and culture.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or