• Fri
  • Aug 22, 2014
  • Updated: 5:10am
CommentInsight & Opinion

Vehicle owners can't shirk their responsibility in polluter-pays society

Tiffany Leung calls on owners of polluting vehicles to do their part to cut emissions

PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 15 January, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 15 January, 2013, 3:41am

With the chief executive's policy address approaching, discussions abound that the government may take a "carrot and stick" approach to combat Hong Kong's notorious roadside pollution - by limiting the number of old commercial diesel vehicles allowed on our roads and subsidising the cost of replacement vehicles.

Just how much should the subsidy be? Industry stakeholders have asked the government to cover at least 30 per cent of the cost of a new vehicle. A timely question to ask is: who should be paying for pollution?

When a man falls ill while breathing in the fumes emitted by a diesel truck, he pays the doctor's bill while society pays the larger opportunity cost of his missing a day's work. When calculating what it takes to operate a truck, one can count the fuel, maintenance, insurance and licence fee, but the true cost will be far higher when the impact on public health and the economy are taken into account.

Citizens have long suffered the damage imposed on them by polluters - the premature deaths, the hospital days, the doctor visits and the hours of lost productivity. The amount grows year by year.

Economic development has come at the cost of our quality of life. But, now, there is hope that the money gained can be used to buy back blue skies and better protection of public health.

The government is offering a subsidy for cleaner vehicles. It is now up to the vehicle owners to take responsibility for the pollution they are causing and accept the idea that a polluter should pay. This means replacing their old vehicles as soon as possible and ensuring regular maintenance.

The polluter-pays principle is not popular in a society that prioritises economic development. The public good takes a back seat and resources are commonly misused in the pursuit of growth. In Hong Kong, we now face the consequences of our actions - a city with some of the worst air pollution levels in the world.

However, the city is slowly realising the strain we've been putting on the environment, as evidenced by the proposed charge for waste disposal that the majority of Hongkongers support. Charging a fee for waste disposal creates an incentive for people to generate less waste.

A certain amount of pollution is the cost of a good life, but without effective policies, too much pollution will be produced. If we agree that we should pay to treat our water and waste, then why not air?

Making a polluter-pays principle part of the fabric of Hong Kong society may mean that we all have to pay more in the short term, but by reflecting the true costs of pollution, behavioural changes can be made that will put us on the path towards a sustainable future for the next generation.

Tiffany Leung is social media officer at the Clean Air Network

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

3

This article is now closed to comments

ronwagn
The main concern for environmentalists worldwide should be to cut the use of coal, especially in
antiquated plants. Here are the top ten coal burners:****www.treehugger.com/clean-technology/what-are-the-top-10-coal-burning-countries-on-the-planet-whos-1.html
It is possible for the whole world to drastically cut coal burning and benefit the health of all. Coal pollution travels around the world. It is the worst fuel for pollution:****www.ucsusa.org/clean_energy/coalvswind/c02c.html
Producing and using natural gas is the best solution for base power, in conjunction with solar, wind, geothermal etc. There is plenty of natural gas all around the world, and it can be accessed with new and future technology. In the meantime old coal plants must be replaced with modern ones that can be switched to natural gas fuel when it is available.
Natural gas is the future of energy. It is replacing dirty old coal plants, and dangerous expensive nuclear plants. It will fuel cars, trucks, vans, buses, locomotives, aircraft, ships, tractors, air conditioners, engines of all kinds. It costs far less. It will help keep us out of more useless wars, where we shed our blood and money. It lowers CO2 emissions. Over 4,100 natural gas story links on my free blog. An annotated and illustrated bibliography of live links, updated daily. The worldwide picture of natural gas. Read in 66 nations.
ronwagnersrants.blogspot.com
pokfuklam10
Causes of pollution - 1. Power Stations 2. container ship and port facilities (marine diesel pollution)3. cross border diesel trucks 4. construction dust 5. poor town planning resulting in canyon effect at street level. You'll find the same tycoons have a hand in most of the problems above, but you never hear their names mentioned.
captam
Beijing's and other Chinese cities' air problems are known to be caused by too many CARS on the roads. This also applies to Hong Kong with private car ownership now over the half-million level. Removing a only few thousand old diesel vehicles is not going to solve Hong Kong's road-side pollution problems. You have to erdaicate traffic congestion and this means many of the private cars have to go! Cars being re-licensed in their third year also need to undergo rigid road worthiness inspections including checks for emissions defects.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or