CommentInsight & Opinion

Can Leung Chun-ying deliver clean air to Hong Kong?

Sunday, 20 January, 2013, 2:08am

Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's maiden policy address will be remembered for his declaration that the quality of the air we breathe to be among core livelihood issues, along with the housing crisis, poverty and so on. He will, therefore, be judged on real progress in reducing air pollution, or effective action to back up his words. He started off on the right foot by promising to introduce legislation next year to require all ocean-going vessels to use low-sulphur fuel when berthed in the city. Think tank Civic Exchange, which specialises in air-quality issues, hailed this as a major breakthrough that could reduce the city's sulphur emissions by up to a third. But that's the easy part, since 18 shipping companies have already signed up to a voluntary low-sulphur programme.

It will not be so easy to get tens of thousands of densely polluting, old commercial diesel vehicles off our roads. That is what it will take to make a real difference, such as increased life expectancy for more than 3,000 people estimated to die prematurely each year because of bad air.

Leung pledged HK$10 billion in cash incentives for operators to replace or remove the dirtiest commercial vehicles on our streets by 2019. The lifespan of newly registered trucks will be limited to 15 years. This may sound drastic, until you consider that other countries are preparing to introduce Euro VI emissions standards this year. And it is easier said than done. Ten billion sounds a lot, but so do the 88,000 vehicles that predate the Euro IV standard introduced in the city in 2006. Ex-gratia payments could offset 18 to 30 per cent of the cost of clean-fuel replacement vehicles, up from 10 to 12 per cent in past voluntary schemes that did not attract many takers. But the transport industry has signalled that the government is in for a fight because the package goes too far, while green groups say old vehicles are not being phased out quickly enough.

Roadside urban air pollution is homegrown and manageable. This government's resolve to clean it up where others have failed remains to be tested. Nonetheless, Professor Anthony Hedley, of the University of Hong Kong's department of community medicine, says Leung's plan is a "defining moment". And hopes have been boosted by the appointment of Civic Exchange founder Christine Loh Kung-wai as undersecretary for the environment. For the sake of this and future generations, we trust that her confidence in Leung to make a difference in cleaning up our air is vindicated.

2

This article is now closed to comments

IRDHK
Use carrot and stick. If truck owners go along then give the incentive. If they do not then penalize them to the tune of 17%. This will then create a 27% incentive by only subsidizing 20% of the cost of the trucks.
People who have 15 year old trucks have already had 15 years of gain from those trucks. Thus a 20% subsidy should be all it takes.
RobinDeCaro
Dear editor SCMP,CLEAN UP YOUR MIND BEFORE YOU PUBLISH
please read SCMP's article dated 29.12.2012 titled"13 pc of ocean-going ships registered with low-sulphur scheme" in which it stipulates"Operators of ships registered under the scheme receive a 50 per cent cut in port-related fees if the vessels burn low-sulphur fuel while berthed in Hong Kong"........."But the scheme has been criticised, as the rebate only offsets between 30 and 45 per cent of the increased cost of using the more expensive low-sulphur diesel"......."While the EPD has introduced its incentive scheme, regulations have yet to materialise."
And now you are saying " But that's the easy part, since 18 shipping companies have already signed up to a voluntary low-sulphur programme."
Please clean up your mind before you publish anything.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or