• Wed
  • Sep 24, 2014
  • Updated: 7:52am
Column
PUBLISHED : Thursday, 31 January, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Thursday, 31 January, 2013, 5:36am

A Sino-US relationship that competes on values

Hu Shuli says Beijing needs to strengthen its regional diplomacy efforts to affirm its values and dispel doubts among neighbours

A new phase of Sino-American relations is poised to begin, now that Xi Jinping has been confirmed as China's next leader and Barack Obama re-elected US president.

In both countries, the debate about foreign policy options has been robust, particularly on the bilateral relationship. This is the time to reflect on the past and look ahead to the future.

The transfer of power has been smooth for both, with no noticeable change in the conduct of either's foreign policy. Over the past year, China has advocated a win-win relationship of mutual respect between a superpower and an emerging power. It was the approach Xi outlined on his visit to the US last February, and reiterated at November's party congress. Meanwhile, Obama introduced the policy of rebalancing in his first term and has been taking steps to effect this "pivot" towards Asia.

The Sino-US relationship has never been more important, and hope is high that Obama and the new team of Xi and Li Keqiang will do more to forge a relationship of co-operation, rather than confrontation.

The relationship has been highly transparent so far, and we've not seen the kind of misunderstanding, friction or behaviour to "test the water" so common with new administrations. But the lack of strategic trust remains a huge challenge for both.

From Beijing's standpoint, Washington's rebalancing strategy has brought uncertainty to the region. The disputes over Scarborough Shoal and the Diaoyu Islands, as well other rows between China and its neighbours, can be understood in this context. America's determination to be a key player in Asian security has emboldened regional countries to lean on it. The result is, when involved in a row with China, these countries have become less likely to compromise.

The US has repeatedly said it takes no side in the Sino-Japanese dispute over the Diaoyus. But if Japan had not been a US ally, would it have acted the way it did?

Of course, without the US security guarantees, nationalism in Japan might grow even stronger and the calls to rearm through a change in the constitution might get even louder, and that would destabilise the region.

The US presence in Asia will only grow, now that the Americans are slowly extricating themselves from the Middle East and Afghanistan. This is throwing a spanner in the works of China's relationship with the rest of Asia, particularly its neighbours. US officials and analysts like to describe the bilateral relationship as one of co-operation and competition; in the context of China's relations in its neighbourhood, Washington and Beijing are clear rivals.

China is prepared to meet the challenge, but it should also fully prepare for any crisis. Moreover, Chinese diplomacy in the region must be more proactive to shore up the country's influence.

Sino-US rivalry is risky, and leaders on either side are well aware that any mishandling could lead to devastating conflict. This is why, over the past year, China has been clear that it is seeking a new path. As President Hu Jintao urged at last year's strategic and economic dialogue, the two countries should "prove that the traditional belief that big powers are bound to enter into confrontation and conflicts is wrong, and seek new ways of developing relations between major countries in the era of economic globalisation".

The striking feature of a rising power is its expanding interests, which may easily lead to conflict with the dominant power. As the world's two largest economies, China and the US must seek new ways of relating that benefit not only themselves but the rest of the world.

How, then, should China respond to the US pivot to Asia?

It has been China's policy to base its relationship with its neighbours on economic opportunities. Through trade and investment, China has sought to share the fruit of its growth with others in the region, and has thus built a foundation for peaceful co-operation. This effort must continue.

But, as the challenges thrown up by America's strategic rebalancing have shown, a relationship built strictly on economic co-operation is not enough, and political and security concerns must also be addressed. In fact, a close economic relationship often creates such concerns.

America's policy in Asia is founded not on economics, but on a vision of a secure and stable strategic order in the region. It is not surprising that this vision of a common good - coupled with the values that America likes to champion - is attractive to countries in the region.

Thus, in some sense, the Sino-US rivalry is really one fought on values. In this regard, China needs to strengthen dialogue with its neighbours on politics and security matters, establish bilateral or multilateral security mechanisms, and do much more to dispel their doubts and worries.

This is nothing short of a competition between the American Dream and the Chinese Dream. China has to adjust, elaborate and strengthen the substance of its Chinese Dream, to increase its moral appeal to others. Once this missing piece of the puzzle is in place, Chinese diplomacy will have found a new lease of life.

Before this can be achieved, however, China should first successfully tackle its domestic challenges and deepen reforms at home. In other words, its diplomacy - built on the strength of its values - is but an extension of its internal policy.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

This article is now closed to comments

caractacus
This article is a thinly disguised cover for China's self-centred drive for economic growth and power. To achieve that it is bent on securing as much of the world's natural resources it can. Its so-called diplomacy mainly consists of bribing or bullying other nations and the dialogue it engages in has the sole aim of benefitting itself, but without any visible altruism in its agenda. Its values are those of dictatorship and secrecy versus democracy and freedom. It argues that its system is better yet its mentality contains strong racial undercurrents.
The ideological debate is going to become very similar to that between the Axis powers and the democracies in the 1930's and 1940's.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or