• Wed
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • Updated: 10:32am
CommentInsight & Opinion

A world without America as No 1

Kishore Mahbubani says US denial about its loss of dominance in a changing world will only undermine our ability to cope with new problems. Reform of global agencies remains the best hope

PUBLISHED : Thursday, 14 February, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Thursday, 14 February, 2013, 1:29am

Long before anyone else, former US president Bill Clinton saw that America would have to prepare for the time when it would no longer be the No 1 power in the world. In his 2003 Yale University address on "Global Challenges", he said: "If you believe that maintaining power and control and absolute freedom of movement and sovereignty is important to your country's future, there's nothing inconsistent in [the US continuing to behaving unilaterally].

"[The US is] the biggest, most powerful country in the world now … But if you believe that we should be trying to create a world with rules and partnerships and habits of behaviour that we would like to live in when we're no longer the military political economic superpower in the world, then you wouldn't do that. It just depends on what you believe."

Long before 2003, Clinton wanted to begin preparing Americans for this new world. "Clinton believed … what we had in the wake of the cold war was a multilateral moment - an opportunity to shape the world through our active leadership of the institutions Clinton admired and [Charles] Krauthammer disdained," writes Strobe Talbott, former US deputy secretary of state, in his book The Great Experiment: The Story of Ancient Empires, Modern States, and the Quest for a Global Nation. "But Clinton kept that belief largely to himself while he was in office … political instincts told him it would be inviting trouble to suggest that the sun would some day set on American pre-eminence."

Sadly, few Americans have heeded Clinton's wisdom. Few dare to mention that America could well be No 2. I discovered this when I chaired a panel on "The future of American power" at last year's World Economic Forum in Davos. After citing projections that America would have the second-largest economy in just a few years, I asked the American panellists - two senators, a congresswoman and a former deputy national security adviser - whether Americans are ready to become No 2. To my shock, none could acknowledge publicly this possibility.

America may become No 2 faster than anyone has anticipated. According to recent International Monetary Fund projections, China will have a larger share of global gross domestic product than the US by 2017: the US share will decline to 17.9 per cent, and China's will rise to 18.3 per cent.

Even if America becomes No 2, we will still have a better world. In many ways, the world is "converging" to American values and standards. The global middle class is booming, interstate war is waning and never before have people travelled and communicated across the world so easily. These changes are creating common values and norms across the world.

However, while humanity is well on its way to combating absolute poverty and interstate warfare, other problems are surfacing. Curtailing issues like climate change, human and drug trafficking, and financial crises requires co-operation among nation states, yet this is not happening. A simple analogy illustrates this.

Before the era of modern globalisation, humankind was like a flotilla of more than 100 boats in their separate countries. The world needed a set of rules then to ensure that the many boats did not collide and facilitate their co-operation on the high seas. The 1945 rules-based order strived to do this, and despite some failures, it succeeded in producing a relatively stable global order for more than 50 years.

Today, the 7 billion people who inhabit planet earth no longer live in more than 100 separate boats. Instead, they live in 193 separate cabins on the same boat. But this boat has a problem. It has 193 captains and crews. No captain or crew cares for the boat as a whole. The world is now sailing into increasingly turbulent waters with no captain or crew at the helm.

It's in the interest of all - particularly great powers - to strengthen institutions of global governance so that we're not sailing blindly into choppy waters without a captain. The National Intelligence Council recently projected that in 2030 Asia would overtake the Western world economically, technologically and militarily. When China becomes a superpower in a matter of decades, the US and Europe will want to ensure that it plays by the rules.

But in order to make international organisations like the UN, the IMF and the World Bank more credible and effective, they must undergo serious reform. It is manifestly absurd that the West makes up 12 per cent of the world's population but takes up 60 per cent of UN Security Council permanent seats. It's nonsensical that the head of the IMF is always a European and the head of the World Bank is always an American. This concentration of clout in the hands of a relative few has grave implications for these institutions' effectiveness and independence, making them instruments of the West.

No other organisation has the scope and legitimacy that the UN currently enjoys. For example, the US has for years been trying to pressure China to take a more proactive role in fighting climate change. Predictably, China has resisted these pressures because it saw them as an American ruse to curtail Chinese economic growth. Only when the UN Development Programme raised the issue with China did the Chinese government take heed. The UN and its many agencies may soon lose invaluable credibility if the West insists on monopolising its power over these institutions.

Any reform of the UN should take into account three principles: democracy, recognition of power balances and the rule of law. Institutions of global governance can be made more democratic by ensuring that their leadership reflects the composition of the world's population. At the same time, we must also take into account geopolitical relationships among emerging and middle powers. Finally, the rule of law is essential to the mediation and resolution of thorny international issues and to governing the conduct of states on the international stage.

In this rapidly changing world, it's a mistake to allow institutions of global governance to stay as they are. The 1945 rules-based order is no longer appropriate. Leaders must find the courage to continue advocating for stronger multilateral co-operation. It is time for our captains and crews to emerge from their cabins and start steering the boat.

Kishore Mahbubani is dean of the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, NUS, and author of the forthcoming book The Great Convergence: Asia, the West, and the Logic of One World. Reprinted with permission from YaleGlobal Online. http://yaleglobal.yale.edu

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

6

This article is now closed to comments

pslhk
What kind of childish rubbish are these:
-"the US has for years been trying to pressure China to take a more proactive role in fighting climate change. Predictably, China has resisted these pressures because it saw them as an American ruse to curtail Chinese economic growth. Only when the UN Development Programme raised the issue with China did the Chinese government take heed. "?
-
(1) KM, you know the arguments about "stock and flow". Why don't you approach from that angle?
(2) Why don't you compare (a) per capita pollution, and
(b) global benefits from national pollution outflow.
-
"the rule of law is essential to the mediation and resolution of thorny international issues "
KM, go read John Perkins' SHoAE!
sudouest
The UN is not even legit at all, born out of WW2. It has veto powers. Everyone else needs to coo to those in the dictator seats. On top of that, we as citizens of the world have no say at all. Same goes to the World Bank and IMF.
OldPeak Toad
Dear Sir, it takes more than just a big GDP to be the world's number one. How is China doing elsewhere?
lib_prc

The Chinese need to realize they are a lucky people and be thankful for that even though the Americans and Aussies are even luckier (by a big margin)...their younger generation can probably explain better what values China represents but that might take some years.
shuike
China is going nowhere fast. The US & its European allies are still in the driving seat in the UN, IMF & the WB. And with the US pivot to Asia with its inevitable Asian Spring, Wars & Mayhem, you better sell that Peak residence of yours pronto before it becomes valueless.
xvikramx1
Regular reader here of the SCMP - one of the best posts I have read to date.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or