• Thu
  • Dec 18, 2014
  • Updated: 7:15am

Hong Kong Budget 2013

Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah delivered his sixth budget speech on February 27, 2013, in which he unveiled HK$33 billion worth of relief measures and forecasted a surplus of about HK$64.9 billion for the 2012-13 financial year. Economic growth was expected to come in 1.5 to 3.5 per cent in 2013.

CommentInsight & Opinion

Budget meets its first duty, but where's the vision?

Joseph Wong says while the financial secretary has largely followed the policy direction set by his boss, his budget offers little long-term vision on poverty, tax reform and an ageing society

PUBLISHED : Friday, 01 March, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Friday, 01 March, 2013, 3:32am

There are two ways to examine the 2013-14 budget presented by Financial Secretary John Tsang Chun-wah. The first is to treat it as a financial statement that allocates sufficient resources for the implementation of Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying's policy initiatives, contained in his policy address delivered in January. A government budget should also support the chief executive's governance philo- sophy and, where necessary, propose additional measures to propel economic growth and provide relief to those who deserve it.

In carrying out the chief executive's vision, Tsang has done his duty, but only just. Enough resources will be allocated to Leung's projects, such as the new Old Age Living Allowance, amounting to HK$8.3 billion and representing a substantial share of the increase in next year's recurrent expenditure. But Tsang did not seem to share Leung's enthusiasm in certain areas. For example, the Financial Services Development Council - set up by the chief executive as a government advisory body - got just one line in the budget speech.

While singing the chief executive's tune of fostering economic integration with the mainland, the speech was a reminder of the need to preserve Hong Kong's characteristics as an international city, and the core values of individual freedom, the rule of law and a clean government, which align us with the international system. I can see in Tsang a better salesman of Hong Kong than his boss at international forums.

The budget offered one-off relief measures and tax reductions, similar to last year's. This should help remove the negative reaction caused by Leung's first policy address, which was widely criticised as uncaring to the underprivileged and the middle class. However, one should question whether the continuation of annual one-off relief measures is an excuse to avoid tacking the real problems of poverty.

This suspicion is reinforced by the government injecting HK$15 billion into the Community Care Fund, which was set up by former chief executive Donald Tsang Yam-kuen as a one-off welfare project with matching contributions from the government and business sector. With this additional money, the fund could comfortably supplement the government's one-off relief measures by targeting those outside the established safety net.

But the government should start looking at the long-term role of the fund to ensure that it does not become a convenient vehicle for dishing out money, thus avoiding tackling the real causes of poverty and income disparity.

John Tsang has helped raise the credibility of the government's housing policy by providing concrete figures. For example, he announced that the supply of land in the coming year would be sufficient to build some 25,800 private residential flats. He also gave an assurance that, in the next three to four years, a total of 67,000 first-hand units could come onto the private residential market, the highest since 2007.

Together with the pre-budget measures to double stamp duty on property transactions, Tsang has at least done his part to warn potential buyers of the risk of buying property at the present time.

While Tsang may get a pass mark for delivering a budget in support of the first policy address of the new administration, it is necessary to be more critical if the budget is viewed as the sixth version delivered by the same financial secretary, raising the same problems but offering no solutions. For example, Hong Kong's narrow tax base and the proposal for a goods and services tax was the subject of a public consultation exercise in 2006 when Henry Tang Ying-yen was financial secretary.

Although the government decided to abandon a sales tax in face of strong public opposition, Tsang raised the unresolved issue of a narrow tax base in his first budget speech, for 2007-08, and has made it a point to include it in every pre-budget public consultation since. But nothing was done or proposed during his last five-year term. There was also nothing in this year's speech.

When asked about this afterwards, he said there was room to broaden the tax base, but any specific proposals would require detailed examination. Is he prepared to come forward with at least an updated consultation paper in the coming year? Or will he continue to do the irresponsible thing and dodge the issue until his second five-year term ends?

In his second budget speech, for 2008-09, Tsang had the foresight to warn of an ageing population in Hong Kong, and said that the number of people aged 65 or above would rise sharply in the next 20 to 30 years, to one in four by 2033.

But for years afterwards, he proposed nothing to start addressing the problem, and the government has not even presented a public document to explain the size of the problem and possible options to deal with it.

In this year's budget speech, however, Tsang updated the figures and said that the number of elderly people aged 65 and over would increase to 2.56 million by 2041, when the elderly dependency ratio would drop to 1.8 working-age people supporting one dependent elderly person. Faced with this staggering figure, he finally announced the setting up of a working group, with scholars and experts joining, to "explore ways to make more comprehensive planning for our public finances to cope with the ageing population and the government's other long-term commitments".

While this should be welcomed as better late than never, the financial secretary and indeed the chief executive must realise that an ageing population of such a scale and magnitude affects not just our public finances but all aspects of our public policies, such as medical services. The working group is useful, up to a point, but far from adequate in addressing the full problem.

Containing handouts worth more than HK$30 billion, this year's budget should pass the Legislative Council with little difficulty. But it is disappointing to see a budget that offers very little long-term vision, and features just the usual annual acts of balancing the books and spending some money to please everybody.

Joseph Wong Wing-ping is a former secretary for the civil service

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 
3

This article is now closed to comments

johnyuan
2 questions: 1. While must keep the FS position, why John Tsang was asked to fill it by CY Leung. 2. With past experience of a thankless job in budget matters, why John Tsang agreed to stay on? We may never know the answer to the first if Leung doesn’t tell. But we all know the answer to the second even if Tsang doesn’t tell especially after his sixth budget report.
johnyuan
As a former government servant, Joseph Wong’s review of John Tsang’s budget speech gives us as an insider’s view and by far it is more comprehensive than others which he divides it into two parts. He attributed the first part of the budget in implementing CE’s initiatives (albeit not all initiatives). Here we see who is the boss behind the budget – and rightly so it is CY Leung as far as what and how much each item get funded that closely tied with his vision. The second part of the speech contains inappropriate reminders: “remaining as a international city, core values of individual freedom, the rule of law and a clean government.” Sounds the CE should be uttering them. More, it is the role of the Housing Minister or the CE to announce that the supply of land in the coming year would be sufficient to build flats. But he could report that there is an anticipation of government revenue earn from supply of land. Even Stamp Tax, sales tax and aging are issues beyond just money. They have vast implication on governance that related with what CE visions that complies with society’s need. Wong’s review, without pointing out the inappropriate part of the speech makes his comment less insightful. As it stands, SF being one of a government position from the colonial era, has a confusing role and it is unproductive. It’s time to reform and as Hong Kong doesn’t need a SECOND spare tire to CE as to a colonial governor. Instead, Hong Kong needs a City Comptroller who is an accountant.
22gt7
With a view to locating where the FS had gone wrong in estimating the surplus of HK$62.9 billion (Revised estimate for 2012-13), I try to wade through the figures as shown in the Govt’s 2013-14 budget schedules. The following figures are most striking and revealing:
Summary of Expenditure Estimates (P.25)
Actual exp. Approved estimate Revised estimate Estimate
2011-12 2012-13 2012-13 2013-14
106 Miscellaneous Services($'000) 115,525 34,542,507 990,607 57,272,497
These figures show that FS had over-estimated Miscellaneous Services by 33.5 billion ($34,542,507,000 – $990,607,000) in 2012/13. Based on 2011/12 (115,525,000) and 2012/13 (990,607,000) figures, a normal accountant will estimate the Miscellaneous Services for 2013-14 to be around 1 billion. If 1 billion is assumed to be the correct guesstimate for Miscellaneous Services, FS would over-estimate the result of 2013/14 by 56 billion!

Login

SCMP.com Account

or