My Take
Tuesday, 19 March, 2013, 4:27am

Hong Kong needs to get real on national interest

National interest means different things to different people. So it's interesting that President Xi Jinping cited it in his maiden speech as head of state to urge Hong Kong and Macau to rally behind the country.

No doubt he has intended a heavy dose of patriotism and love in his formulation. He wants to say the two special administrative regions need to consider the overall interests of the nation "to safeguard and foster [their own] long-term prosperity and stability".

State leaders have been emphasising the importance of patriotism as a criterion to pick leaders to run Hong Kong during the National People's Congress in Beijing, which ended on Sunday. But perhaps it would be better for both Hong Kong and the mainland to evolve a more realistic and business-like working relationship rather than insisting on love and blood ties.

So let's consider the more usual meaning of the phrase "national interest", something close to the heart of every political realist. It is that in politics, there are no friends, only common interests.

What Xi says makes even more sense in this context. Beijing is ready to consider anything that is in Hong Kong's interest, so long as Beijing's legitimate interests are also recognised and met. New Premier Li Keqiang said something similar afterwards, urging Hong Kong to make good and full use of the central government's economic and social initiatives to benefit the city.

Beijing has every interest to see Hong Kong prosper. But it also has legitimate or non-negotiable core interests in the city and its future development, especially in terms of democracy. One interest is surely our clear recognition that the Chinese Communist Party is the central government, which is also the only legitimate government of "one China". From this, it follows Hong Kong cannot be used as a base to challenge the legitimacy, unity and sovereignty of the Chinese state; nor can it have a leader Beijing does not trust.

Therefore, the screening of chief executive candidates is a given, though Hong Kong may still have a big say on how this can be done in a future "one person one vote" electoral franchise.

This is not what usually passes for full democracy, but it is not a bad deal, given how Beijing defines the nation's core interests.

14

This article is now closed to comments

whymak
"....the sovereignty of China extends to Hong Kong, although one can make a persuasive case that Chinese sovereignty does not or ought not extend to Taiwan, Tibet and perhaps some of Uigher lands."
There is freedom of speech that is constructive for all concerned and there is irresponsible speech for your feeling good that invites endless disputes, and worse, self-destruction. This underpins Mr. Lo's short essay.
Everyone is entitles to his ignorance, but not to the right to propagate his opinions as facts. Keep your ignorance of history of Tibet and Xinjiang as opinions to yourself. This is not the issue du jour. Comprendre?
the edge of razor !
fully agree that in politics, there are no friends ,forever friends, but just common interests.As an English idiom:there is no forever friends,no forever foes but just forever interests.Yet the common interests of the Beijing communist party government and Hong Kong (especially the majority of commoners) may not match since we (most Hongkongers with sense) long for a geniune universal suffrage while recognizing the Communist Party government as the legitimate ruler of China. Beijing used to worry that once Hong Kong goes fully democratic that has a geniune universal suffrage of which the leader is voted in through,'one man, one vote' ---directly-elected by all qualified voters and candidates for the top post in town is not screened (to curb so-called radicals or anti-China elements from taking part in it), then our compatriots on Mainland will demand the same treatment which will undermine the autocratic rule of the Communist Party--the sole party to govern China forever and ever, if possible.Just like Emperor Zihuang Chin's Chin Dynasty 2000 years ago ! Right ?
whymak
,'one man, one vote' ---directly-elected by all qualified voters and candidates for the top post .... " Hate to remind you, this is not how the US elects a president or how the UK selects a Party leader to be the next prime minister.
So you go to your church, and I mine, okay.
Unfortunately, your church is going to be more like Egypt's Tahrir Square or Yeltsin's Russia. That's assuming that you know what has been going around in the world today.
SpeakFreely
Wait until RMB fully convertible....Hk will have less and less leverage. Wake up.

Pages

Login

SCMP.com Account

or