• Wed
  • Dec 24, 2014
  • Updated: 5:45pm
CommentInsight & Opinion

Hong Kong needs to address its light pollution problem

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 23 March, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Saturday, 23 March, 2013, 2:55am

Hong Kong's nighttime skyline is iconic, a megawatt cacophony of billboards, neon signs and video walls. Visitors find views of Victoria Harbour from The Peak breathtaking, but the dazzle and blitz of light from bustling streets after dark are what they most remember of our city. There is another side to the story, though, one lived by residents of crowded urban areas and people yearning to connect with nature. To them, the brilliance can be a nightmare, a fact borne out by a study showing that there is perhaps no worse place on earth for light pollution.

University of Hong Kong researchers were shocked by findings that showed brightness levels so excessive that health and wildlife could be harmed. Above the premier shopping district of Tsim Sha Tsui, brightness levels were 1,200 times more than the night sky, while they were 130 times higher at the Wetland Park in Tin Shui Wai. Nowhere in the world has there been so extensive a study of light pollution and it is good that the work has been carried out in our city. The findings are reason for public debate on whether it is time to replace voluntary technical guidelines with tougher measures.

Earth Hour tonight will give a taste of what less lighting means. Participants in the annual international event organised by the WWF will turn out non-essential lights for an hour from 8.30pm to highlight climate change and the need to use less fossil-fuel-produced electricity. A good response is unlikely to dim the golden glow above Hong Kong enough to see the stars, but will certainly put a dent in power usage. It will also send a message to retailers, advertising companies and building owners and managers of the need to better handle lighting.

Stargazers see that need. Beyond a scientific interest, there are those with a desire to be reminded of our place in the universe. Research shows excessive light also harms wildlife. But it is the effect on human health that is most worrying. Light pollution can get in the way of a good night's sleep and that could lead to depression, heart disease and cancer.

Hong Kong has no restrictions on excessive use of light, only voluntary guidelines. A government task force on light pollution has made limited headway after 20 months of work, due, according to one member, to resistance by vested interests in the advertising, property and tourism sectors. Laws have to be a last resort. With complaints and concern rising, authorities have to do more to educate and encourage self-regulation.


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Jon Smith
So I guess HK is out of the running for the next deep field optical telescope? :D
As former Director of the NASA funded G.L.O.B.E. program, I would like to bring to the attention of Hong Kong educators, students and their families that they can participate in "GLOBE at Night," an international program designed by the U.S. National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) to help teach people about the light pollution problem worldwide as well as help scientists better understand the full extent of it. Free materials suitable for classroom and home use are available on the project's website at globeatnight.org. Students and citizen-scientists in over 90 countries contributed more than 16,000 simple observations last year. GLOBE at Night can help us all understand the health and environmental hazards created by excessive use of unshielded lighting in Hong Kong.
The light pollution study group is so predictable like many other special study groups in Hong Kong would yield no new finding (professor’s study is the exception) or solution to the problem at hand. Ten months of study is just a public relationship with no real intention to fixing problem. It is a sham setup when the majority of the study group members are vested in self-interest – the property developer / electrical power plant owner, and the tourism board. These members would selfishly make no change in curtailing the excessive use of lit advertisement in outdoor. To them it is a penny foolishly spent is many dollars gain. The public not only pay some of those dollars to keep those signs there illuminated through out the night but suffer from the effect of prolonged exposure to them. The most hidden downside is the burning of extra air-polluting coal to get the megawatt on.
Stop the study group but start legislate a law that represents the interest of the majority. Again Hong Kong’s social problem is much linked to property developers.


SCMP.com Account