• Wed
  • Jul 30, 2014
  • Updated: 9:10am
Column
PUBLISHED : Wednesday, 27 March, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Wednesday, 27 March, 2013, 3:09am

Time for Beijing to stop its media propaganda

Frank Ching says Beijing should realise that its propaganda in the media only muddies the water and hurts co-operation with others

The election of Xi Jinping as president provided an occasion for the People's Daily to request an interview with Zbigniew Brzezinski, the national security adviser of US president Jimmy Carter.

The "transcript" of the interview was published in the paper's English-language online edition. I put "transcript" in quotation marks because, as it turns out, it was not a full account of what Brzezinski said. His praise of China was published in full but his most critical remarks were left out.

Asked about China's achievements since 1978, Brzezinski said much of China then "was still living in the late agricultural age". Since then, he said, "Every time I go to China I am just stunned by the rapidity of the change … You are creating at least for, I would say, probably between one-fourth and one-third of your population, an ultra-modern society as advanced as anything in the world."

The reporter asked whether conflict between America and China was inevitable. Brzezinski said, "What worries me these days is what I see in the Chinese press." What followed was the most sensitive part of the interview, when Brzezinski addressed the rise of nationalism in China.

He cited several examples of what was appearing in the Chinese press but all were censored. One was an article in Outlook Weekly last August, which alleged that the strategic objective of the US "is to ensure its leading status in the entire Asia Pacific region, build a trans-pacific order centred on the United States, and continue its Pacific dominance … The key link here is to sow discord in the good neighbourly, friendly, and co-operative relations between China and countries on its periphery."

Brzezinski said: "In other words, the US is accused of deliberately promoting - deliberately promoting - discord between China and its neighbours."

After censoring more of his remarks, the People's Daily allows Brzezinski to speak again. "Your press is an official speaker," he said, "and you are creating an atmosphere in China in which you are stirring up a very powerful social force, which is nationalism. You can create … an atmosphere dominated by nationalism, which will make it impossible for you to co-operate with us. And it will make it impossible for us to co-operate with you."

Brzezinski is right to point out that the press is controlled. Although the media is more diversified than before, commentaries reflect official policy. Beijing must realise the atmosphere being created by its propaganda will make conflict with the US much more likely - conflict that neither side wants.

Already, China is living with the result of years of anti-Japanese propaganda, which makes any resolution of the dispute over the Diaoyu/Senkaku islands unlikely. In fact, anti-Japanese sentiment in China has resulted in the rise of nationalism on the Japanese side - something Chinese propagandists didn't realise would happen.

The Chinese leadership, if it is serious about seeking advice, should take Brzezinski's words to heart and stop the propaganda before it is too late.

Frank Ching is a Hong Kong-based writer and commentator. frank.ching@scmp.com. Follow him on Twitter: @FrankChing1

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

9

This article is now closed to comments

batokklp_os
Spot on!
captam
@"Brzezinski is right to point out that the press is controlled."
I trust he and you were both referring to the American press?
Watch Prof. Robert Jensen's Youtube video report entitled "Proof of how american media is controlled by Israel"
ndubuisi.okeh
Xi Jinping is another emperor of the Capitalist Party of China (aka Communist Party of China). Chinese Central Government = Communist Party of China, they're one and the same joined by the neck.
pslhk
FC’s “analyses” are often mechanical, didactic, pretentious, platitudinous and, interestingly, also opportunistic.
whymak
Perhaps your criticism is too strong for my taste. Here is my honest opinion. Mr. Ching writes well. But his Op-eds have a party line touch and feel. Unfortunately, his moderate opinions are not backed up by strong facts and logical arguments.
Yes, I prefer to read passionate, hate-China moronic readers. For me, it's like watching an entertaining situation comedy on TV. A good laugh is always better than a bland sermon.
dead2k1
Your responses are often didactic and dull. Also, you've used either the word didactic or dull in all of your responses.
yentsun
Mr. Ching's attentiveness both to the necessity for the completeness of evidence as well as to the terrors that derive from nationalism is rare, helpful, and praiseworthy.
whymak
Remember everything should be a two-way street. Mr. Ching should also demand that so-called multiple sources that he frequently quotes are not just from a single source from his favorite media echo chamber. On matters of Democracy faith, he sometimes prefers to eschew such discretion.
Yes, I pointed out this inconvenient truth occasionally in my personal correspondence, much to his displeasure I must say.
Emphatically, I agree with him that China's propaganda machine has its own illogical spiel. Yet it's hard to get him to concede an iota to China's attempt at scientific approach to governance. Doctrinaire one-man-one-vote democracy as the only solution to governance has tainted his views and has become a singular perspective, which is no different from most Christian evangelicals.
dead2k1
Sorry, what's your suggestion for democracy other than 1 person 1 vote? You're shaking my faith in humanity.
 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or