• Thu
  • Jul 24, 2014
  • Updated: 2:42pm
Occupy Central
CommentInsight & Opinion

Wiser to shut out Hong Kong's media echo chamber

Lau Nai-keung says extreme views and horror stories only distort reality

PUBLISHED : Friday, 29 March, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Friday, 29 March, 2013, 3:18am

Recently, some visitors from the mainland recounted their happy experiences here in Hong Kong. Contrary to their impressions from the media before they came here, they found that Hongkongers are, on the whole, courteous and helpful. During their short stay, the tourists encountered no hostility or discrimination.

Of course, such stories are anecdotal, but no more so than the horror stories reported in the media and the "war cries" on the web. If our hospitality towards mainland visitors is as poor as some people want us to believe, how can you explain that, on average, some 100,000 of them continue to flock here every day?

In this vein, when I saw a recent online poll in this newspaper indicating that 95 per cent of respondents (at the time of writing) believed Hong Kong people favoured reverting to British rule, the figure was so incredible that I didn't even laugh; I just rolled my eyes in exasperation.

If the figure had been around 10 per cent, I would have taken a serious look, and if the figure was perhaps 35 per cent, then I would have laughed. But 95 per cent? I know the results are from a highly biased sample of English speakers, but still …

Much of the media nowadays resembles a mirror at a funfair, which never renders the truth of what is actually around us, but instead reflects distorted images.

This is especially true given the now fashionable brand of journalism where facts and commentary are frequently mixed together and reporters who are mostly young and inexperienced tend to fuse their political bias into their reporting. Many intentionally use their self-righteousness as a political weapon. Some people have become so engrossed in this game that they do not take the distortions at face value but instead use them to attack others who do not share their perceptions.

The internet exacerbates this phenomenon as it tends to group together like minds. On Facebook, for example, practically all an account holder's friends share similar views and, as a result, that person tends to think they are right and their views represent those of the majority. There is also a feeling of power when, at a click, you seem to be able to summon thousands of people into concerted action.

What you see through the media is somewhat divorced from the real world. This is especially true for outsiders, and that is why so many books have been written by outside observers forecasting the collapse of the Chinese economy and its government, yet it has never come to pass. The anecdotal evidence is there and the analysis is compelling, but the authors write from the other end of a long, long tunnel and see only a limited view.

For those who live in the real world and do not get most of their information from the media (that is, most people), they do not buy this rubbish, no matter how hard it is pushed.

Amid all the fanfare, you may have been led to believe that Hong Kong citizens are on the whole against national education. But talk to parents; they know where the opportunities lie and where their children will have a better career, and they fight to get their children into Putonghua play groups and kindergartens.

And if you think most people share the view that the food across the border is totally unsafe, just look at the popularity of gourmet tours to the mainland.

Given this background, do many people really support the dissidents' unrealistic demands for universal suffrage in 2017 to the point that they will participate in civil disobedience, occupy Central and precipitate a "colour revolution" of some sort?

I think you know the answer already. Personally, I just cannot help but roll my eyes again.

Lau Nai-keung is a member of the Basic Law Committee of the NPC Standing Committee, and also a member of the Commission on Strategic Development


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

the sun also rises
This Lau Nai-keung is absolutely the shame of Hong Kong University (his alumni) where he graduated in the early seventies of last century.His distorting remarks made from time to time in the media (either S.C.M.P.or Hong Kong Economic Review:Shun Pao) were/are actually extreme views(blind loyalty towards Beijing authorities) and horror stories themselves.He has never done his CPPCC job well but instead failed miserably since he has never contributed valuable views to the authorities on vital national issues (such as serious pollution,rampant corruption, abuse of power by cadres and ...)But instead, he chose to attack local pan-democrats and their followers for their views or acts.How shameless and shameful this old guy is ! He is indeed the shame of intellectuals in town though he is both proficient in English and Chinese but brainless in politics, i regret to say.Right ?
the sun also rises
are your words trash ? probably ! You just don't know ! What a pity ! NK Lau used to attack the pan-democrats in town without any reasons.Being a H.K.U.alumni,he is a shame to that institution.His admirers including you may not be trash,but ...!
crazy in distorting the fact


SCMP.com Account