Media censorship of terrorism on Chinese soil only feeds the rumours | South China Morning Post
  • Sun
  • Mar 1, 2015
  • Updated: 12:22pm
CommentInsight & Opinion

Media censorship of terrorism on Chinese soil only feeds the rumours

Zhou Zunyou says authorities should relax their tight grip on information to foster understanding

PUBLISHED : Monday, 15 April, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Monday, 15 April, 2013, 2:31am

On March 26, the news website Tianshan, run by the Xinjiang regional government, reported that local courts had sentenced 20 men to jail terms of up to life imprisonment for promoting terrorism and inciting secession. Of these, 19 individuals in four groups were found guilty of organising, leading or participating in terrorist organisations. The groups were accused of spreading multimedia materials related to the East Turkestan Islamic Movement and the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan, both considered terrorist organisations by China, the US and the United Nations.

Although the Chinese-language report did not mention the ethnicity of these criminals, their distinctive names and religious affiliations indicate they are most likely Uygurs.

Uygurs and the ethnic Han do not co-exist as harmoniously as Chinese TV programmes and films like to display. The region has been hit by ethnic violence from time to time, the worst of which in recent years was the July 2009 riots in Urumqi , Xinjiang's capital, in which 197 people died, mostly Han. Heavy security since then has not prevented sporadic terrorist attacks.

In mainland China, terrorism is perceived as the violent expression of Uygur ethnic separatism and religious extremism fostered by international connections. The terrorist threat primarily emanates from the East Turkestan independence movement. Although most independence organisations disclaim violence, a tiny number of small groups may present a risk high enough to require a large-scale response.

While the Chinese government accords a high priority to the fight against terrorism, its anti-terrorism efforts are often accompanied by low media coverage. In all likelihood, the authorities' strict control of information is the result of a carefully orchestrated strategy. China started its anti-terrorism campaign long before the September 11 attacks on the US. Chinese officials began speaking of terrorist violence in the late 1990s, but they moderated their statements probably for fear of scaring away investors. Another reason was a fear of internationalising the issue of "East Turkestan", a term so sensitive that its use was not allowed in the official media.

After 9/11, America's global "war on terror" prompted China to openly confirm the existence of terrorism and declare the government's determination to address this problem. Except for the deadly July 2009 unrest, where the authorities' style of openness by inviting foreign journalists to the crime scene surprised the public, details about terrorism have usually been concealed or censored.

Controlling information about terrorist attacks has an obvious advantage. To effectively terrorise, this kind of political violence needs to reach an audience far beyond those directly affected in the attacks. For this reason, terrorists need the help of the media to spread their message and generate fear. Media coverage serves as the "oxygen" of terrorism. By cutting the supply, the authorities hope to ward off the serious social and political repercussions of attacks.

Yet media censorship also has its disadvantages. People can still get their information on the internet. And, in the absence of reliable sources of information, baseless rumours may spread and trigger greater anxiety. And if the people are unaware of the truth and excluded from discussions on policy changes, the authorities will find it even more difficult to deal with such crisis situations, let alone eliminate the root causes of terrorism.

The current media policy against terrorism is not helpful. In fact, it may be counterproductive.

A more productive approach would be for the government to gradually loosen its control on information. This is especially important because the media, as a public watchdog, offers an indispensable forum for the Chinese people, together with their government, to seek a better solution. In the final analysis, freedom of the press is a fundamental human right and one of the foundations of a democratic society.

Although the Chinese constitution promises to protect press freedom, this right is not adequately respected in political life or legal practice. In this respect, it shares the same fate as that of many other human rights on the books.

This situation will change over time as people begin to take this freedom more seriously. Even if the government does not act on its own initiative, media censorship regarding terrorist activities will probably be eased, little by little. As the first step, relevant information should be made available to researchers.

China is far from being a liberal state. It has made impressive legal progress in the past few decades; still, for cultural, historical and political reasons, it continues to flout the rule of law. In the future, China will have to combat terrorism with one hand tied behind its back, just as most liberal states do.

Zhou Zunyou is a Chinese researcher and head of the China section at Germany's Max Planck Institute for Foreign and International Criminal Law

Share

Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or