• Mon
  • Dec 22, 2014
  • Updated: 6:31pm
My Take
PUBLISHED : Monday, 15 April, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Monday, 15 April, 2013, 2:33am

Focus fight on who picks the candidates for chief executive

"I have simply grasped the one thread which links up all the rest."

Hu Shih, the father of Chinese democratic liberalism, began his classic, The Development of the Logical Method in Ancient China, with this quote from Confucius.

In dealing with complex issues, the sage advises, look for that underlying issue to illuminate and move things forward. The escalating war of words between the pan-democrats and mainland officials has generated more heat than light. The poisoned rhetoric from both sides has not changed the political realities; it has merely confused the key issues.

Now, a few individuals on both sides have started to make more sensible noises.

Law professor Benny Tai Yiu-ting who came up with the Occupy Central protest plan said over the weekend that we should focus on the composition of the nominating committee that will select candidates for the 2017 chief executive race. That's exactly right. The committee's composition is where the real battleground for universal suffrage will be.

Tai is not the first to point this out. It was, in fact, Alan Hoo, SC, head of the Basic Law Institute, who first called on the pan-democrats to focus on that after various mainland officials said any CE candidates must love Hong Kong and the motherland and never challenge the central government. But Hoo is friendly to Beijing. Hopefully, Tai will be more persuasive with his pan-democratic colleagues.

All the charges and counter-charges about patriotism and the screening of candidates just confuse the issue. They boil down to one question: who will sit on the nominating committee?

Beijing will want it to resemble the current 1,200-member election committee, which is selected by less than 250,000 voters and mostly drawn from sectors that replicate the rotten boroughs of the functional constituencies.

Pan-dems like Tai will want the new committee membership to be returned by a popular vote.

The future committee will have to be much more representative electorally than the election committee. But it's just a non-starter to demand giving everyone a vote on its membership.

Let's just hope cooler heads will prevail on both sides and start putting viable proposals on the negotiating table.


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

If the purpose of having a functional constituency is to get ALL the sectors represented in whatever changes that will affect people – law and election of the CE, then the reality tells us it is utterly false. Hong Kong was once had sectors more ran by independent individuals. Each was more likely spoke the true interest of a sector that adding all up to represent a true Hong Kong. The reality in Hong Kong nowadays the individual and independent sectors only exist in appearance.
Conglomerates in Hong Kong have reduced the functional constituency to voting as a block. In fact, political power in Hong Kong resides disproportionally in the influential hands of very few conglomerate heads. Hong Kong is a company town where a boss dictates and employment controls everything from schooling, housing and eating.
There must be a new way to run Hong Kong; not because of envy, it is more about the built-in safety in diversification in entrepreneur opportunities. Then, Hong Kong will come to a full circle to its beginning where each sector is independent without a voice from the top. But, the conglomerates will make sure they will pick the next CE and stay put in the legislature forever. Entrepreneur opportunity for you? What a nuisance.
Sometimes comments from readers are more interesting than news or column. Most of the comments supposedly come from ordinary folks of whom their comments can provide us view from what expired or set. Without sincerity in what one wrote is like treating the comment space as one’s playground – useless to others though. Perhaps using real name as a requirement like in the NYTimes can make SCMP’s more interesting and challenging. Not very probable from commercial point of view for SCMP? So a playground it is.
hard times !
Cooler heads will prevail and start putting viable proposals on the negotiating table between the pan-democarcy camp (now led by Professor,Tai Yiu-ting and supported by all 27 pan-democrat lawmakers) and Beijing loyalists ( represented by their heavyweights Ng Hon-man,Leung Oi-see,Tam Wai-chu and ...) may sound like a daydream as the dispute has escalated into heated arguments and finger-pointings at opponents at public forums or accusations of Han /Hong Kong traitors against political rivals emerged.How can a peaceful negotiation be held in the coming years before 2017 ? I wonder.
hard times !
of course Beijing will want our future Nomination Committee to be more or less the same as the past Election Committes which formation was made up of pro-establishment and pro-Beijng elements.In this way,the chief executive picked will be 100 % loyal to the Beijing authorites though he/she might not please most commoners in town.But who cares ? In a non-democratic country, allowing a certain small area to practise a so-called democratic election is a rare exception already ! How can we Hongkongers be totally different from our compatriots across the border at Lowu. Right ? Democracy is a taboo on Mainland China, just like 'June 4th' or even,'Hu Yiu-bon' or 'Chiu Tze-yang' !
hard times !
now it is learnt that the bottom-line of the Central government of our candidates for the chief executive is: not related to the democracy movement in June 1989 or a key member of the Federation of Supporting Beijing students' democracy movement founded by late Uncle Szeto Wah.It means even Civic Party's Audrey Yu is okay since she did not involve in that movement and not a member of that Federation.But Democratic Party's Albert Ho or Workers' Party's Lee Cheuk-yan or Reverend Chu Yiu-ming are not allowed to compete for the top post in town.Beijing's main worry or concern is the future chief executive should never be one who is considered against Beijing though he/she loves his/her country and Hong Kong as well. That is: not an enemy of the Chinese Communist Party and its governance---never advocating or supporting the end of one-party rule on Mainland China.Never ! Just let them and their descendants and descendants enjoy both power and wealth plus beauties forever and ever and never challenge their power of rule then you are welcomed and close friends of the CCP and the cadres as well.
hard times !
bluechinagroup well knows that every new name appears in this Comment column is written by pflim040, maybe he/she is a prophet.Oh, dear ! No one can disallow any writers posting his/her views here with different names or usernames as Hong Kong is a free socitey which allows freedom of speech and there is no censor on the internet as our Great Mother Country.Why bother to attack/blame another writer here ? I wonder.You express yours,while pflim040 expresses his/hers.Let us all enjoy freedom of expression here !
hard times !
bluechinagroup or redchinagroup is not writing anything related to the topic/news above but just keep on attacking another writer so-called pflim040 though the latter may have used different usernames to present his/her views here, what is wrong with that ? i just don't understand.If this bluechinagroup (redchinagroup) is fed up with what this pflim040 (who carries numerous pen-names) and his postings,please stop reading his/her postings then he/she/they can have a sound sleep or they have to endure many sleepless nights ahead, it is for sure !
hard times !
pflim040 is a racist just because he has once criticized the Indian wrter (a local journalist and host of TV programs),Mr.Michael Chugami's words on our upcoming universal suffrage in 2017 for our election of our chief executive ? How biased your opinions against this nice guy named pflim040 is ! Shame on you and your lousy English ! Go home and study hard (in English of course) before coming back here to bark at our beloved writer; so-called pflim040 or all his usernames(pen-names).Okay ?
hard times !
agree with Alex Lo this time that all questions /issues boil down to one question only: who will sit on the Nominating Committee which is to choose our chief executive in 2017 ? If the Committee members are chosen by 'one man,one vote' then any screening mechanism or so-called 'a primary poll' is absolutely unnecessary since the members can fully represent all qualified voters in town to choose the leader for them----so-called broadly representative !
hard times !
of course,Beijing would like the upcoming so-called Nominating Committee to resemble the current 1,200-member election committee,(of which some members were chosen by this Old Hong Kong as well) which is selected by less than 250,000 voters in town and most of them drawn from sectors that replicate the rotten boroughs of the functional constituencies now exist but have long been gruntled upon. Pan-dems like professor Tai will want the new Nominationg Committee membership to be returned by a popular vote----all qualified voters can have the chance to choose their favourite Nominating Committee members to reflect their wishes/choices. Anyway,we were told by C.Y.Leung that the new Nominating Committee will be more progressive than the past Election Committee.Just wait and see how broadly representative it will turn out to be !




SCMP.com Account