• Sat
  • Dec 20, 2014
  • Updated: 12:09am
CommentInsight & Opinion

Hong Kong has lost its spirit of entrepreneurism

PUBLISHED : Monday, 15 April, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Monday, 15 April, 2013, 2:31am

Hong Kong was built on entrepreneurism. Its free economy, first-rate infrastructure, low tax rates and legal system are the ideal support for someone with a bright idea wanting to start a business. Our wealthiest citizens, among the richest people in the world, got to where they are because of the opportunities our city and China provided. Yet the spirit that took our tycoons to the upper reaches of the global billionaire rankings is today not as prevalent as it once was. Openings that would once have been seized upon are instead seemingly being ignored or left to others to exploit.

This is surprising given that just to our north, there is a hive of entrepreneurial activity. We share the same background, yet somehow have lost the drive to push ourselves, and the city we live in, to greater heights. Here and there are people with creativity, innovation and new thinking, but they are few in number. The result is that even a straightforward opportunity, like taking advantage of the needs of mainland parents for safe baby milk formula - which could have been met by improving supply and converting an industrial building into a large-scale retail outlet - has been ignored.

So, too, it would seem, has gone the chance of Hong Kong becoming a hub for medical tourism, a regional centre for education or the Silicon Valley of Asia. Other cities saw gaps, took the risks and are prospering. It is not the fault of the government; it can facilitate, but it is up to the free market to innovate. Nor can we heap the full blame on landlords and high rents; communities will usually support good homegrown ideas and allow them to prosper.

No definitive study has been done on Hong Kong entrepreneurism. Anecdotally, though, a number of factors can be pointed to for the apparent lack of spirit. Parents have great sway on their children's education and careers and prefer them to join the corporate world or civil service. Universities turn out relatively few people with development talent. Investors have more faith in well-established companies and real estate than start-ups.

Entrepreneurship involves risks, commitment and hard work. As our billionaires prove, though, there is no other way to gain significant wealth. For the entrepreneurial spirit to again thrive requires a supportive culture and community. Landlords have to be not so greedy and parents less demanding. With the right mindset, we will all benefit.


Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

This nameless editorial is clueless. The editor/writer accepts without doubting truly if Hong Kong has a free market, first-rate infrastructure, low tax rates and legal system. They aren’t just as so much have been reported and written about even in SCMP. He or she acts like the three monkeys – see no evil, hear no evil and speak no evil.
Hong Kong has had its golden period that peaked out in the mid-eighties of last century. Since then entrepreneurship becomes unaffordable except to the conglomerates. Here the editorial could have offer an explanation why it is so instead persisting Hong Kong of an image which is not. Without telling the truth, the golden period of Hong Kong will never return.
One note your definition - Entrepreneurship involves risks, commitment and hard work. But, with the present system where hawkers, squatters, street-artists being "killed off" while most jobs and businesses are closed to outsiders - via "trade qualifications" - such as in the construction industry. New innovation are also banned - such as electric vehicles. Our system must change to allow more freedom to do anything that does not endanger the public, unless the Government can prove otherwise.
The article is quite correct. Hong Kong has lost its entrepreneurial edge primarily through too much government. Where could government could have been more helpful, anti-monopoly legislation the Hong Kong government has favored the tycoons over potential entrepreneurs. The public has suffered as a result.
no shat einstein.
Most money in Hong Kong has been made primarily on property speculation and development, and secondarily, on trade. Hong Kong has not been a city of innovation, or any great government co-ordination to focus on new industries. HK's entrepreneurism has been primarily confined to a very few business sectors: property, trade, banking & finance, and ancillary services. Today, other than banking & finance and as a choice for regional headquarters, Hong Kong has no other burgeoning industries. Office rent and salaries are too expensive for most industries to base most of their staff here. But let's be realistic. Other than education and medical, which really are missed opportunities, isn't it better to be a regional centre for banking and other high end services industries, than a manufacturing centre. Hong Kong really is an Asia counterpart to London and New York.
True, but Hong Kong has wilfuly given all its industries to the so called Motherland. While city state's like Singapore excel in indutries such as computer products, high tech innovation and robotics and even manufacture jet engines, Hong Kong's government has pushed everyone out with its pro property speculation policies. Hong Kong has great universities, yet so many of our young graduates are forced to go work in the Mainland ebcause there is no industry here. It will take a new type oif leadership to really start focusing on Hong Kong and what is good for Hong Kong. Some investors will suffer for sure, but at this point everybody should already be on notice. God save Hong Kong........


SCMP.com Account