• Fri
  • Dec 26, 2014
  • Updated: 11:10am
My Take
PUBLISHED : Monday, 13 May, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Monday, 13 May, 2013, 1:52am

Pan-dems get a taste of their own medicine over costly poverty trip

When you spend too much time fighting an enemy, you become like him. That may be why a group of lawmakers led by prominent pan-democrats have decided to spend up to HK$560,000 of taxpayers' money to study poverty relief in Finland and Sweden, just about the most expensive countries you can visit.

The cost of the proposed week-long trip in August includes air fares, airport taxes, hotels, meals, insurance and travel expenses. Led by the deputy chairman of Legco's subcommittee on poverty, Dr Fernando Cheung Chiu-hung, the trip has the support of chairman Frederick Fung Kin-kee. Besides these prominent pan-democrats, subcommittee members include the Democratic Party's Albert Ho Chun-yan, unionist leader Lee Cheuk-yan, "Long Hair" Leung Kwok-hung and the Civic Party's Alan Leong Kah-kit. Pro-establishment members include Tam Yiu-chung, Abraham Razack and Regina Ip Lau Suk-yee, but it's not clear how keen they are to join the trip, especially now after the media exposure.

It's good that our pan-dems educate themselves. But I would prefer they just bought a few books to teach themselves the basics of the Scandinavian welfare states. Hell, it would be cheaper to fly over in first class a few of the countries' experts if our lawmakers are so keen to learn. I am sure their consulates in Hong Kong would be happy to make the arrangements.

By the way, have pan-dems like Fernando Cheung ever heard of the internet? I've been told it's an excellent - and free - research tool! The two countries are among the most extreme welfare states in the world, the very opposite of Hong Kong's social-economic system. They also have the least income inequality and poverty.

I am sure we could achieve similar results if we decided to turn ourselves into an extreme welfare state tomorrow. There is no mystery about those countries' social-economic conditions.

Over the years, the pan-dems and their media allies have "nickel-and-dimed" government officials for taking overseas business trips, criticisms sometimes justified, sometimes not. They have created an atmosphere in which every business trip by officials is assumed to be illegitimate, corrupt or, at best, unnecessary.

As the Good Book teaches, you reap what you sow.


More on this story

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

hard times !
maybe our pan-democratic camp lawmakers (represented by lawmaker,Cheung Chiu-hung this time) should review their trip to Sweden and Finland (which are both rich and democratic countries and practise good social securtiy systems while their tax rates are both sky-high compared with our beloved Hong Kong). I wonder why they don't visit Shanghai and Taipei instead ? Both these two cities have poverty issues as Hong Kong and they are much closer to Hong Kong too .In this way,it can save the precious public money to be used on our elderly poor in the territory if John Tsang would like to !
hard times !
On the contrary,Hong Kong's constabulary has never been so-called cowed by Democracy zealots but just democracy-lovers and their faithful followers such as this Old Hong Kong. You suggest our lawmakers to visit Calcutta intead of Sweden and Finland ? Why don't you suggest them visiting North Korea--an ideal hermit socialist nation or Cuba--an autocratic socialist country instead ? I wonder.You are just a bunch of democracy-haters not self-hate Chinese of course,but self-proud so-called **** only ! Right ? ha ! ha !
hard times !
i regret to say you so-called,'whymak' is the geniune rabid illiterate who are fear of anyone using numerous pen-names to write here----which is allowed and lawful ! In your nasty eyes and minds,you prefer and enjoy the censorship of internet on Mainland China ! Right ? Go back there and stop barking here at our beloved:pflim040 who speaks for most of us (excluding you and your accomplices of course) here in our beloved Hong Kong ! Okay ?
hard times !
What is this down-below guy uttering ? His grammar and usage of words are vague and incorrect to the extreme ! Such type of languages should never be allowed to appear in this prestigious local English paper's Comment forum ! Right ? I sincerely advise both 'Johnwe' and 'whymak' to go home and brush up their lousy English before returning here to post their so-called 'comments'( or trash indeed) in this forum ! Okay ?
Why are our Legco members to bereft of creative ideas or initiative of their own? One lot apes the most primitive aspects of western democracy and another have spenr and will spend more studying other people's poverty even in counties which don't have them. What kind of logic is that?
We have poverty here - study and come up with your own solutions. You don't need other people to tell you how to deal with our own problems.
I suggest that legislators enrolled for the trip forego the trip and expenses and each one of them give their share to a street sweeper, dishwasher, or roadside vegetable vendor or deprived family.
As for Leung Kwok Hung joining the junket, he is showing his true colours. He is wasting oru money to block the budget and yet he joins this money wasting trip like a mindless blood-sucker.
John Adams
@ whymak : Not sure if you were referring to my comments below, but if so please let me clarify.
In the course of my normal business work I recently had to research a very complex subject matter to "equivalent Ph D thesis level" of thoroughness. The subject matter was certainly far less complex than how Finland and Sweden handle their poverty issues!
In 3 days on-line with google ( which these days even translates foreign-language reports ) I found out virtually 95% of all that existed in the world on the subject I needed to research.
( When I actually did my Ph D over 30 years ago , long before the days of the internet, the same degree of thoroughness of research on a far narrower subject took me 6 months of library-work)
My point was therefore only to demonstrate that Legco members do not need to fly to Sweden and Finland to research "poverty" in two of the richest countries in Europe. They can pay a researcher to do the job in a few days in-line, and then follow-up with a few well-placed conference calls with high-placed Swedish/ Finland officials, which no doubt their high status as Legco members would instantly grant them
And zero jet-lag problems as a bonus
Sounds like a northern European party trip to me. If you want to study poverty, go to Ethiopia or Kenya and live in huts with the locals. See how many sign up for that then and how many suddenly have become "very busy" with their schedules.
@ Alex Lo "....would be cheaper to fly over in first class (perhaps business class) a few of the countries' experts if our lawmakers are so keen to learn." ~ to fly out experts or academics from the countries mentioned for a briefing to the lawmakers as well as the government officials or anybody involved in the betterment of Hong Kong is more constructive. Moreover, these academics or experts may be able to give more ideas if they are able to experience Hong Kong's environment first hand........and this may lead to more fruitful development and ideas for Hong Kong. Just my humble thought.
hard times !
Once again,this Old Hong Kong agrees with what Alex Lo said about the social economic conditions of both Sweden and Finland which are both just the extreme opposite of Hong Kong's.As information technology advances as days go by,the information that our lawmaker Cheung Chiu-hung needs can be easily be found on the internet:maybe through 'widipaedia'. Right ? There is really no need to spend any public money on this issue by going to two faraway countries to do such a research indeed ! Well said,Alex Lo ! Don't just blame Timothy Tong if our lawmakers commit the same type of 'offences'----wasting public money on excuses of carrying out duties ! Right ?
John Adams
Correction : the filibuster preceded the internet by two thousand years:
From Google in precisely 2 seconds :
One of the first known practitioners of the filibuster was the Roman senator Cato the Younger. In debates over legislation he especially opposed, Cato would often obstruct the measure by speaking continuously until nightfall. As the Roman Senate had a rule requiring all business to conclude by dusk, Cato's purposefully long-winded speeches were an effective device to forestall a vote.
PS :The English term "filibuster" derives from the Spanish filibustero, itself deriving originally from the Dutch vrijbuiter, "privateer, pirate, robber"
Hmmm... that seems an appropriate description of the clowns doing it now in Legco




SCMP.com Account