• Fri
  • Nov 28, 2014
  • Updated: 10:36pm
PUBLISHED : Sunday, 19 May, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Sunday, 19 May, 2013, 3:55am

Taiwan's reaction to killing of fisherman is out of proportion

Philip Bowring says the anger at Philippines over the killing of a fisherman in disputed waters smacks of nationalistic chauvinism and will only aggravate regional tensions

BIO

Philip Bowring has been based in Asia for 39 years writing on regional financial and political issues. He has been a columnist for the South China Morning Post since the mid-1990s and for the International Herald Tribune from 1992 to 2011. He also contributes regularly to the Wall Street Journal, www.asiasentinel.com, a website of which he is a founder, and elsewhere. Prior to 1992 he was with the weekly Far Eastern Economic Review, latterly as editor.
 

Now it's Taiwan's turn to show some nationalist anger, and its target is the Philippines. Behind the outrage over the death of a fisherman lies suspicion of a Han chauvinism that can only exacerbate the tensions between China and its southern, non-Chinese neighbours.

For sure, the Philippine coastguard was guilty of the trigger-happy behaviour so common in a country which inherited its gun culture from the US and whose armed services are not known for their discipline. But the reaction by the government in Taipei, with economic and other sanctions, is out of all proportion given that this unfortunate event was clearly the result of local misjudgment rather than the state policy of the sort which sends Chinese warships well within the Philippines' exclusive economic zones, not to mention several incidents when Chinese vessels have opened fire on Vietnamese fishing boats and killed people.

For the Han chauvinists, an apology from the president of the Philippines is not enough. The Filipinos must grovel, be reminded that they, like Malays generally, are the serfs of the region. It fits well with the Hong Kong government's arrogant categorising of the country as in the same danger league as Syria because of the unnecessary loss of life in the bus hijacking incident.

The action of the Filipino coastguard was out of proportion, even assuming the fishing vessel was in Philippine waters and resisting arrest. But Taiwan's large, well-equipped fishing fleet is known almost worldwide for its contempt for others' fishing rights and the attempts to limit fishing to preserve species.

The fact that Taiwan has no formal diplomatic ties with any significant country makes it easy to avoid such transgressions becoming government-to-government issues.

Taipei's reaction seems more than just local political pressures on a weak President Ma Ying-jeou but linked to the desire to show that the island's Kuomintang government is at least as eager to pursue Chinese maritime claims as Beijing. The same has been seen in respect of the Diaoyu islands even though a limited deal with Japan on fishing has been agreed.

Taiwan's consequent higher profile in South China Sea issues makes peaceful accommodation in the region more difficult and shows the Taipei government placing more emphasis on old nationalist doctrines than strengthening relations with its non-Chinese neighbours.

It is a reminder that the now infamous "nine-dash line" by which China claims almost all the islands and related rights in the South China Sea was not a Communist invention but dates back to KMT rule. That was a time when Chinese maps made claim to chunks of Burma and other adjacent countries.

Even though most of these land borders have since been settled with the respective countries, the assumption that neighbours were once tributary states and should be again runs deep. How else can one explain the doubts now being aired by semi-official organs in China that Okinawa, centre of the old Ryukyu kingdom, is not Japanese because it was once a tributary state of China? The notion of a tributary state, one which kowtows to Beijing for political support, the right to trade or simply to give the emperor prestige, is imperialism in its simplest form.

In the Philippine case, China never exercised the attempts at hegemony which it applied to Vietnam and other contiguous states. But Filipinos are aware that the majority of people in Taiwan until some 200 years ago were closely related to those across the Luzon Strait. Incorporation into the Qing empire in the late 17th century was followed by colonisation which meant that the fate of the Taiwan indigenes was no better than that of native Americans.

As late as 1873, Beijing's admitted failure to bring all the island under control provided an excuse for a Japanese invasion to suppress "piracy" by indigenous groups - who more than two centuries earlier had successfully resisted a Japanese invasion. The attitudes of China as conqueror and coloniser still lurk despite the Philippines' successful, peaceful absorption of huge numbers of Chinese (including President Benigno Aquino's ancestors) who are better integrated than in most of Southeast Asia.

The overdone outrage over the death of the fisherman simply adds to regional suspicions of Chinese attitudes. Likewise, it is easy for most of those involved to see through Beijing's proclaimed attempt to prioritise relations with Asean by making Southeast Asia the first overseas destination of new Foreign Minister Wang Yi . By visiting four countries but avoiding Vietnam, the Philippines and Malaysia, the visit raised suspicions that it was simply to try to stir divisions within Asean while China has given away nothing either in terms of its territorial claims or refusal to discuss issues except bilaterally.

The omission of Malaysia was especially interesting given that China has so far avoided direct conflict even though its claims take in Malaysian gas fields and Layang Layang, a coral atoll 320 kilometres off the Borneo coast, which lies well within the Chinese claim just outside that of Philippines. It has an airstrip, small naval base and dive resort, and the Malaysian air force flies regular sorties over it.

Philip Bowring is a Hong Kong-based journalist and commentator

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

36

This article is now closed to comments

yiling.tan.71
The author should read up on some fact first:
1 Phillippine had been killing Taiwan fishermen for the past 30 years and got away because they always took the boat. This time it failed to get the boat and Taiwan finally got evidences of the brutality of these corrupt "pirates" which explains why they went for the hard stance.
2 you third paragraph are much more biased and a touch of racist
3 The author should go back to research about "notion of a tributary state" for China. It is definitely different than imperialism in its simplest form as it DO NOT include military occupation& mass murdering the natives for land
4 research Taiwan's history: 200 years ago, it was controlled by the remanents of the Ming Dynasty after it drove off Dutch colonists before Qing. Han Chinese never did any mass murdering of Taiwan natives in Ming or Qing dynasty or later unlike the Dutch and Japanese. Author is being even more biased here without checking the facts
5 the outrage is done mostly by ROC China not PRC China and yet author in the second to last paragraph attribute the outrage to PRC China. Completely off the marks
6 The last paragraph about Malaysia has no bearing in the article and the topic, not sure why the author toss it in.
The author in the middle and last few paragraph really went off the topic into other tirades against PRC China instead of against ROC China. IT shows how much bias the author really has and the inability to even STAY ON TOPIC
chihhung.pan.9
Yes from that very expensive gadget record shown that the boat was never outside of Taiwan exclusive economic water. A life has been taken here pls shows some respect or at least try to get your facts right before posting
johnwe
I disagree. Aquino is full of himself and his sense self-importance makes me laugh as I Know the Philippines well and have met ministers and even Presidents and one of the wives.
Aquino is intolerably pompous and got his comeuppance this time.
I remember when Donald Tsang tried to ring him as the hostage drama unraveled in Manila, he refused to take the call. The drama ended with 8 dead and not a few permanently disabled and badly impaired for life.
Aquino's explanation for refusing to take Tsangs call was protocol. He said imagine the President talking to a local governor - No way.
On that occasion he was smiling throughout, as if it was a joyous occasion and two days ago, he was also grinning as he tried to dismiss the Taiwan remonstration.
chihhung.pan.9
I am not sure what would be consider as a proportional way to handle this unfortunate incident to which similar shooting which took place about 7 years ago taken 2 lives. Reading your article clearly show me that you understand existing regional disputes and history as well the solitaire position of Taiwanese government in the world today, however the part that u are missing is the history of our fisherman been taunted and harassed lawfully or not by PCG in last 30 years aside from frequent arrest, detent of our crews and vessel, ransoms, and extortion. we seek the outcome of this unfortunate incident to be the last of its kind between Taiwan and Philippine, and clear whatever was done, agreed and promised between both countries were not honored in a sense to protect the fishing activity by our fisherman in the rightful water. Pls view the little people history and evidence so far shown to this killing before considering what is or not proportion action taken by our government. My hope as the least outcome of this incident would be no more blood shed to our fisherman in their rightful fishing ground and they can return home to their love ones with every departure for trips needed to live, work, and support their family like rest of us.
megafun
wonder what reactions we'll give if its a HK fisherman? I certainly regard Taiwan has so far not over-reacted! I can only assume that Brownings does mind being shot dead whilst fishing !! Is he trying to say the next time our fishermen gets shot at, we ought to carry on - with a stiff upper lip, and business as usual?
siulun2050
Mr. Bowring, please educate us on how to react. I doubt that any western nations would react any differently.
Hollander323
This article starts with a very racist tone..." Han chauvinism " ...with this you would know what the writer is going to write in the article..He went as far as giving excuses for the Philippines, quoting trigger happy is just a habit of the Philippine soldiers..
Philip Bowring is always a China Basher...How can his writings find a place in an intellectual newspaper like the SCMP.
michael.yu.94214
Japanese coast guards shoots water canons and Philippine coast guards shoot automatic weapons.
Japanese coast guards detains offending fishermen, Philippine coast guards holds innocent fishermen for ransom and beating them for submission.
Japanese has reached fishing agreement with Taiwan (after 17 failed negotiations, finally completed after agression and threats coming from China), Philippines has refused to negotiate with Taiwan on fishing rights todate.
It may be true that based on the status above, the issue may not go as far if it is the Japanese who wrongly killed the fishermen, but the chances for Japanese to commit such mistake would be lower than low.
The Taiwanese is generally not a trouble maker, saying that it is picking on a weak country is unfair considering an innocent life have been lost where his family and fellow countrymen should have the right to express their anger.
Please be aware that the sanctions imposed by Taiwan on Philippines also hurts the Taiwan business and families internally, but all Taiwanese people back their government to take a strong stance, this is 23 million people voicing their anger, to imply that this is bullying is simply not correct. The Taiwan Authorities and Media calls out to the people to treat the Philippinos currently living and working in Taiwan with respect, and do not vent their anger towards these innocent people, I believe overall Taiwan has acted reasonably todate.
whymak
Obviously, Mr. Bowring's article is music to the ears of a few racist readers here. My advice to them is exactly the same as one given elsewhere in this publication. If you hate yellow folks that much, why don't you pack up and leave?
I am not the only Hong Konger who doesn't take kindly to a white supremacist nurturing and harboring such deep hatred for us. What if he can't contain his ugly passion and starts picking off hated yellow people like flies with an AR-15 at Times Square?
I’ll say this to people like reader "caractacus". Commit yourselves to a psychiatric hospital. You might avoid a potential mass murder and the unspeakable agonies of families and friends, provided you still have human feelings.
Let's put things in perspective. The Iron Lady sent her Navy 8000 miles across the ocean to vindicate the honor of a defunct empire. 255 Brits and 645 Argentines died over a storm in a teacup. For an alleged kidnapped soldier, Israel started a full scale war and killed thousands. The US killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqis for nonexistent alleged weapons of mass destruction.
A Chinese customs officer boarding a Chinese ship in China and tearing down a Union Jack was used as pretext for Second Opium War.
These are Western current standard as well as precedents. Let’s put Taiwan in this perspective.
Another question dumb people never ask: Why are Philippines and Japan having territorial disputes not just with China but with so many other countries?
dienamik
This article is hilariously dumb.

Pages

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or