• Wed
  • Dec 24, 2014
  • Updated: 3:44am
My Take
PUBLISHED : Saturday, 08 June, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Saturday, 08 June, 2013, 2:11am

Decision to end ESF subsidy a lesson in Machiavellian ruthlessness

Shock and horror! Fees for schools under the English Schools Foundation from 2016 will be at least 23 per cent higher as the government phases out the public subsidy.

But you would expect that. The die was cast once the Education Bureau announced it would phase out the current subsidy. You want to know how much ESF parents will eventually have to pay? Just check out the fees of other international schools.

The decision to end the subsidy after freezing payment for a decade may go down in history as one of the most ruthless made by this administration. But before you pick up your pitchfork and bay for blood, it's not entirely the fault of Chief Executive Leung Chun-ying and his education secretary, Eddie Ng Hak-kim. Of course it is their fault for allowing it to happen. But I am actually not sure they know what they are doing with the ESF in the sense they almost certainly did not come up with the policy decision - those immediately below Ng within the bureau did.

There is an almost Machiavellian elegance to the decision - if you discount its irresponsibility, unfairness and immorality. You can be sure our clueless Mr Ng would never come up with something so clever; this is reserved for the senior administrative officials within the bureau, not a few of whom - I bet - are, or were, ESF parents.

Let's see what this decision really means. Taxpayers' money will be saved. The ESF is certain to prosper, as it will be able to charge high fees and million-dollar debentures on a par with other international schools. The government can claim it is helping to boost international school places without lifting a finger. It is also a populist decision as many local families resent the real or perceived special treatment given to the ESF as an old colonial institution.

But it is never explained why it is no longer the government's responsibility to support affordable education for non-Chinese-speaking children of residents or permanent residents. Nor is it clear why local families should be left to their own devices once they leave the local system and join the international school sector.

But the reality is that these families are on their own unless they can pay the high school fees.


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

The government has massive debt and unemployment is at an all time high. Thus the government must cut spending wherever it possibly can. This is the only responsible action!
That would be correct if we were in Europe. But no we are in Hong Kong with a massive budget surplus with so much cash flowing around that we are drowning in it! There is absolutely no reason that the gvernment is cutting funding to education.
Maybe this is all just a nicely disgised housing policy. Make people pay more for education so they have less money thus stop house prices going up. That is the only possible reason for such a moronic and idiotic policy.
Urban kid
There goes affordable education for the children of expatriate children! I would like to remind the ESF and the Government that not all expatriates who choose to work in Hong Kong have company allowances. A very bad day for Hong Kong as it will ultimately affect Hong Kong's competitiveness.
Government currently pays 80% of the fees for Government servants whose children are in ESF.
I presume this will be phased out also since the Government are not hypocrites?
So much for "Asia's world city." Any expatriate family not in the finance sector will never consider laying down roots in Hong Kong now.
save money by giving District Councils $100 million each to spend on concrete , send legislators to Europe to study poverty and legislators to Korea to study incinerators, pay for expensive meals for legislators to try and persuade them to extend landfills and accept incineration etc etc etc
It is unreasonable for expats to demand HK to provide good and less expansive education for their children. Local schools for local children should take precedence when come to budget distribution. However, it is not to say expats are locked out of future ESF school system. All expats worthy to their employer are valuable employees who would or should be given with adjusted compensation for their children’s higher education expanse. The option for leaving HK for a better place is certainly one’s prerogative. For those locals who hitchhike on the ESF may have some room for grievance. They should demand ESF or the like with affordability because HK government is obligated towards its citizens. In fact, Hong Kong government is obligated to provide good education to all its citizens just like all progressive governments do. Education for the international community due to commerce should rightly to follow the marketplace. ESF for the British civil servants has lived out of its justification and rightly it is finally a close chapter in HK history. All should move on?
ESF website:
Six ESF students awarded TOP IN THE WORLD in Cambridge exams 16 March 2013
Congratulations to our students who recently received the awards from Cambridge International Examinations (CIE)!
CIE announced that six ESF students achieved the Top in the World award in the June 2012 IGCSE examinations. Another six achieved Top in Hong Kong and three more received High Achievement across a range of subjects. The examinations were held in over 40 countries around the world. Around 1,000 ESF students took examinations across 36 subjects.
Top in the World
King George V School Karen LAI Wing Yee Business Studies
West Island School CHUI Wan Fung International Mathematics WIS student Chui Wan Fung, who had been accelerated from Year 10 to Year 12, completed the IGCSE International Mathematics a year early with the Top in the World award
Island School Caleb HO Sze Yuen Foreign Language Mandarin Chinese
Joshua WONG Ho Lam
CHAN Chun Long
Janice LEUNG Wing Yan
spot the g-wai-lo ?
yet EDB fails to offer equal fee subventions to ALL children born in HK or with HK permanent ID
That is a good analysis, and I agree. The money that will be saved by the phasing out of the ESF subsidises should be redirected to existing and possibly new DSS EMI schools that offer a the kind of education for which there is obviously demand, albeit then based on the Hong Kong and IB curriculum rather than the UK one that the ESF (mainly) offers.
Good article Alex, except do you really credit the Education Bureau with THINKING?
pslhk, I am not entirely sure what you are trying to say, and fear you are taking the DSS out of context and downgrading it to some post-colonial fig-leaf. If that is indeed your gist, then I don't think that does the DSS justice.

The DSS has been around for more than 20 years, and now includes over 50 secondary schools, and more than 20 primary ones. As you probably are aware, many previously fully private schools, including very long-standing and reputable ones have found a home in the DSS scheme. A fair number of the secondary schools widely considered to be the best in Hong Kong (certainly when it comes to difficulty of gaining admission at least) are in the DSS scheme, and more may follow.

The majority of these schools are English speaking (EMI), and they are allowed to maintain a high degree of autonomy with regards to admissions, budgeting, staff policies and so on. They can even have an IB stream. As long as their main purpose remains to prepare pupils for the HKDSE exams, they will receive subsidy. And while some DSS schools' fees can still be high (some are as high as the current ESF fees), this obviously does help a lot to help them much more affordable than non-subsidised, international schools like the ESF post-2015.

It is a real shame the ESF choose not to enter the DSS with all or at least some of its schools.




SCMP.com Account