• Fri
  • Dec 19, 2014
  • Updated: 6:10am
CommentInsight & Opinion

Endless talk on issues stymies action in Hong Kong

PUBLISHED : Friday, 21 June, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Friday, 21 June, 2013, 1:44am

Consultation is a vital tool for governments wanting to best serve their people's wants and needs. There can be times, though, when an even better way of governing is to make a decision and get what is needed promptly and effectively done. That is a truth Hong Kong authorities have at times been blind to as they try to negotiate our city's political tightrope of long-promised, but still unfulfilled, universal suffrage. Their eagerness to please is too often getting in the way of effective policymaking.

What to do about light pollution and excess energy usage serves as the latest salient example. A government task force has concluded that decorative lighting and advertising signs should be turned off after 11pm or midnight throughout the year. The entertainment and tourism sectors object. So, in keeping with past practice in the face of a lack of consensus, a public consultation process will be held from which may, or may not, come a decision.

An outcome is unlikely for years, if at all. Such has also been the case with what to do about our near-capacity landfills, air pollution, vehicle-choked roads and an unsustainable public hospital system, among much else. Years of discussion, debate, consultants' reports and public engagement processes have not led to policies. The problems have been broached, not resolved.

Light pollution is not a difficult matter to resolve. Like safe air or sustainable waste management, it is a basic community issue. In a city as crowded as Hong Kong, this has to be especially so. Consultation is good to ensure that as many voices as possible can be heard and listened to, but the end result will always be the same: prompt action is essential.

Government inaction does not serve our city well; it stymies development and prevents progress. The decades-long lack of development of the Kai Tak airport and West Kowloon sites proved that only too well. Much-needed decisions were eventually made and now both are proceeding apace - and Hong Kong will one day be the better for it.

Public engagement on the plastic bag levy took a decade, and six years after the first stage was successfully enacted, we are still waiting for the second to begin. We do not want such a time-wasting process with implementation of a promised garbage disposal charge or on curbing annoying lighting. The rounds of consultation on straightforward matters have to end, and the government has to act.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

 
 
 
 
 

This article is now closed to comments

johnyuan
Every important policy seems have been either made or denied ironically by a policy of total consensus requirement from conflicting interests. It may be seemed that government is oblivious most of the time bypassing new policy for governance – actually overlooked many over decades since the colonial time. Governments were not blind to problems at hand. Rather, inactions were deliberate. While obviously laziness on the part of the government, equally obvious is that every veto for a change there is some protectionism by economically vested individual or group. Hong Kong is a very backward society falling out of more enlightened way of life as other cities embrace. Making money is really a very ancient trade or goal. Selfishness and power guarantee to achieve it. It is up to CY Leung and his administration for Hong Kong to catch up by governance with leadership and diligence – work hard for the expectation of the general public.

Login

SCMP.com Account

or