• Thu
  • Sep 18, 2014
  • Updated: 12:25pm

Li Keqiang

Li Keqiang, born in 1955, became China's premier in March 2013. Like ex-president Hu Jintao, his power base lies with the Communist Youth League, where he was a member of the secretariat of the league’s central committee in the 1980s and later in the 1990s the secretariat’s first secretary. His regional governance experience includes a period as vice party boss, governor and party boss of Henan province between 1998 and 2003 and party boss of Liaoning province beginning in 2004. He became vice premier in 2008. Li graduated from Peking University with a degree in economics. 

CommentInsight & Opinion

Free trade zone fits into Shanghai's financial ambition

Woo Jun Jie says plans for a free trade zone in Shanghai will give a major boost to the city's ambition to thrive as a global financial centre, because where trade goes, finance follows

PUBLISHED : Saturday, 20 July, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Saturday, 20 July, 2013, 3:17am

Championed by Premier Li Keqiang, plans to establish a free trade zone in Shanghai have now been approved by the State Council. Combining three areas in the Pudong district, it will allow the Chinese government to experiment with economic liberalisation and renminbi convertibility.

More importantly, it will bring Shanghai closer to its goal of becoming a fully fledged international financial centre by 2020. Given the close linkages between trade and finance, Shanghai's development as a financial centre hinges on its success as a port city. The free trade zone is thus one step along the path that Shanghai needs to follow to establish its credentials as a financial centre.

History has shown that trade is the lifeblood of finance. Hong Kong's current success as a leading financial centre was predicated upon its beginnings as an entrepot, engaged in free trade with other Commonwealth nations under Britain's sterling area. It was only with the onset of the second world war that finance became delineated from trade. Nonetheless, Hong Kong's financial services sector continues to be involved in trade settlement and financing activities.

Similarly, Singapore's thriving banking sector first emerged during its time as a British colony, for the sole purpose of serving British trading activities. Its insurance industry was similarly established with its founding as a British trading post. While post-independence Singapore has focused on finance as a growth sector in its own right, trade finance and maritime insurance remain major components of its financial services industry.

Shanghai needs to take a leaf out of the books of its two regional rivals. First and foremost, trade activities need boosting and the free trade zone is obviously a step in the right direction. Integrating Shanghai into the global supply chain and increasing the amount of trade flowing through its ports will naturally create a demand for related financial services like trade financing and maritime insurance. While the free trade zone will attract the expertise and capital base of foreign financial firms and insurers, this demand will also encourage the development of local financial expertise.

More specifically, the free trade zone will stimulate what economists call "agglomeration" or clustering effects. Foreign financial institutions will be attracted to Shanghai while domestic financial institutions will benefit from the increased capital flows. This will spark a virtuous circle. Related industries, such as accountancy and legal services, will also thrive on the increased activity.

This trade-driven accumulation of financial capital will then provide a base on which other financial services such as securities and debt markets can be established. The government's intent to experiment with renminbi convertibility in Shanghai also bodes well for the development of a foreign exchange market.

Furthermore, plans to establish futures warehousing facilities will allow the city to strengthen its market for futures and commodities. In short, the promotion of free trade will spark a chain effect, leading to the development of a financial centre.

Yet, this does not mean the process is entirely organic. The government will have a key role to play throughout the process. In particular, Shanghai needs to strengthen its regulatory and legal framework.

The continued success of Hong Kong and Singapore as international financial centres is based on the robust regulatory infrastructure and a strong rule of law. To foster greater confidence in its financial services sector and attract foreign institutions, Shanghai needs to ensure a strong rule of law is established and enforced within its jurisdictions.

The government will have a key role to play ... Shanghai needs to strengthen its legal framework

Its financial regulatory agencies will also need to join hands and establish a robust and transparent regulatory infrastructure. Given that financial regulation in both Hong Kong and Singapore is carried out by a single chief regulator (the Hong Kong Monetary Authority and Monetary Authority of Singapore), Beijing should consider establishing a lead agency that co-ordinates all regulatory activities. Foreign financial institutions will find greater assurance within a more stable regulatory environment.

A final point to note is that China's plans to groom Shanghai into a major financial centre will have a significant impact on its regional rivals. Already, there are concerns that Shanghai will pose a threat to Hong Kong's future prospects. However, this may be premature and exaggerated. There remains scope for co-operation, and the burgeoning Asian markets will allow all three centres to thrive and even complement one another.

Hong Kong retains key strengths in its banking sector and loan syndication industry, while Singapore will continue to leverage on its capital markets, asset management industry and proximity to Southeast Asian economies.

There is little doubt Shanghai will siphon off some mainland financing opportunities, but both Hong Kong and Singapore can still rely on their existing comparative advantages and carve out individual niches in regional markets.

Rather than seeing each other as competitors, Shanghai, Hong Kong and Singapore should work with each other by developing complementary financial sector expertise and capabilities. This will require greater inter-government and inter-agency co-operation and dialogue.

Woo Jun Jie is a PhD candidate at the Lee Kuan Yew School of Public Policy, National University of Singapore


Related topics

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

The Shanghai Free Trade Zone is an attempt to boost the property market in that part of Shanghai, nothing more.
A recent SCMP article stated that "the main purpose of establishing free trade zones in Shanghai and other coastal cities was to find a new growth engine for the local economy rather than look for direct benefits from the real estate" (****www.scmp.com/business/china-business/article/1285687/shanghai-free-trade-zone-land-value-soar)
The Free Trade Zone is important in so many ways. First, economic growth: exports make up approximate 30% of China's GDP (WTO, 2011). Second, it is a key aspect of 'Likonomics' and China's ongoing economic reforms. There is no better place than Shanghai to start the gradual processes of economic liberalization and currency convertibility. Third, as I've mentioned, this is a massive boost to Shanghai's future as a financial centre.
There is a need to separate between intended and unintended consequences.
High property prices are a consequence of rapid growth and urbanization, as Hong Kong, Singapore, Seoul and Tokyo have shown. The key challenge now is how the Chinese government intends to lower prices and prevent a property bubble. I believe policy interventions have been enacted. The trick now is in implementation and market response.
You are a dunce if you think that an International Financial centre can be created out of thin air without making the necessary reforms that all international financial centres enjoy.
Rule of Law and free flowing information are paramount. Do you see any moves to give the courts autonomy, take the politics and law commitee out of the courts and hold the government, SOE's and officials to the same laws as everyone else?
Do you see any reofrms in allowing information and opinions, ideas and interllectual discourse to occur without government censorship or interference? ALL news affects markets. Yes, its true.
You are dreaming on this one and your article makes you look like a CCP ministry of propaganda bafoon. Maybe next time you should research international financial centres befofore you argue that Shanaghai will become one.
Sure, the government needs to establish rule of law, freer flows of information, and robust regulatory framework. Which is exactly what the article has pointed out. Also, the article was based on analysis of other financial centres, if you have read paragraphs 3, 4 and 5.
Secondly, the article does not deal with internal Chinese politics, given that I am neither a Chinese citizen nor an expert on the issue.
If you read the City of London's Global Financial Centres Index, you will find that Shanghai is highly ranked as an international financial centre. The point of the article is to identify the key areas which Shanghai needs to improve upon, for it to catch up with higher ranked centres. Factors which have been mentioned in the article, and which you have assiduously repeated, albeit with little comprehension of them.
I believe that is all I have to say. As I have mentioned, domestic politics lie well beyond the purview of this piece. For more on domestic politics, I recommend that you read other pieces. This is first and foremost, a comparative analysis of Asia's three leading financial centres.




SCMP.com Account