• Sun
  • Dec 28, 2014
  • Updated: 12:51pm
My Take
PUBLISHED : Tuesday, 20 August, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Tuesday, 20 August, 2013, 2:18pm

Polluters should pay for clean vehicles

It's a good thing that the government has finally rolled out a programme to replace old catalytic converters and oxygen sensors on taxis and minibuses. We will, hopefully, have less toxic air to breathe in the city. The only problem I have is that it is a subsidy programme. Why should I and other taxpayers pay for it? Shouldn't the polluters pay?

This scheme is estimated to cost us HK$150 million, according to Christine Loh Kung-wai, long-time clean-air advocate and undersecretary for the environment, and is expected to be completed by next year.

Taxi licences are now changing hands for more than HK$7 million, making them one of the hottest markets for speculators. Surely their owners and speculators - and taxi companies - should be responsible for funding the replacement because their vehicles have been contributing significantly to air pollution. They can certainly afford it, thanks to the government's deliberate policy of limiting licence supply and so creating a speculative market.

Over the last 10 years, almost all taxis and two-thirds of minibuses have been converted to run on liquefied petroleum gas. This has been billed as a major achievement. But they require regular and costly maintenance, due to their high mileage.

The problem is, transport officials have devised low standards in testing for emissions. According to Civic Exchange, founded incidentally by Loh, the mandatory annual emissions tests for licence renewal cannot adequately identify vehicles with excessive emissions and do not measure nitrogen oxide, a major source of pollution. It's estimated that 80 per cent of LPG taxis and 45 per cent of LPG minibuses had faulty catalytic converters and sensors, mainly due to poor maintenance. You wonder if the annual tests deliberately have low standards to make sure most polluting vehicles get a licence renewal. The government is effectively rewarding the irresponsibility of polluters out of the pockets of taxpayers. Officials are bending over backwards to placate the transport trade.

Now the programme has started, they should at least have the decency to devise tougher tests to enforce proper maintenance. Otherwise, there will be more massive subsidies down the road.


For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive



This article is now closed to comments

Good point made by Alex. Unfortunately this situation is only another example of the consequences of very weak enforcement of some laws (or other guidelines) in Hong Kong. Illegal parking, engine idling, littering etc.; the laws are all there but the Government is timid on enforcement. Perhaps I can also apply to a Government subsidy next time my car tires are worn and need to be replaced?
John Adams
" It's estimated that 80 per cent of LPG taxis and 45 per cent of LPG minibuses had faulty catalytic converters and sensors, mainly due to poor maintenance "
Is that really true ? if so it's an abomination
The technology to measure exhaust emissions is stone age vintage , not rocket science
This is how things work in HK. The functional constituencies make sure they get compensated for any govt program that impacts their members in exchange for votes.
The golden rule how Hong Kong is governed: any policy to be implemented is because there is a profit for someone that is paid by the general public. It seems there is no wrong except the profit amount is just huge and that someone is just a very few. You feel injustice and stupid.
LPG finally adopted by the taxi trade using decade of years even after it was in use in Japan for two decades proven to be a clean fuel. Alas, Hong Kong can prove Japan’s experience is otherwise – just let the maintenance down and profit up to guarantee no difference to switch in the fuel. During the LPG debate in the Legislative Council, I still remember vividly a photo in SCMP decade ago of CY Leung as EC’s conveyor with his head pocking underneath a car. The caption proclaimed something like “Smelling clean”. Hong Kong is inching towards to become a world city by decolonization perhaps?


SCMP.com Account