• Mon
  • Apr 21, 2014
  • Updated: 9:44am
Column
PUBLISHED : Monday, 26 August, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Monday, 26 August, 2013, 4:04am

Hong Kong is right to keep black travel alert on the Philippines

Alice Wu says the travel alert on the Philippines should stay until victims of the Manila hostage crisis get the justice they deserve

It has been three years since the Manila hostage crisis, yet survivors and victims' families still wait for the justice they deserve, and so the Philippines remains "black" on the Hong Kong government's travel alert list. Some see it as nonsensical, since the travel alert has done little to get the Philippine government to budge. Certainly, it has proved ineffective.

Sure, the new Manila mayor (and the country's ex-president) Joseph Estrada apologised for the tragedy last week. But it's puzzling since the apology wasn't his to make. Whether it was sincere is irrelevant. All Estrada can be sorry for is his president's and his predecessor's inability to say sorry.

Estrada must know that his apology is technically inconsequential. And while all this talk about what he would have done may well be true, it has the additional "virtue" of being self-serving; highlighting where Alfredo Lim failed and how he would have handled it better is a terrific public relations move. It was a perfect image-building opportunity and Estrada capitalised on it.

The apology should have no effect on Hong Kong's travel alert, which really shouldn't be much of a cause for controversy. Over 100,000 Hong Kong tourists visit the Philippines every year, even after August 23, 2010. So, it is clear it hasn't deterred Hongkongers from visiting a country whose authorities have proved - in their handling of the hostage crisis - to be completely inept and incapable of protecting innocent lives in hostage situations. Every year, enough Hongkongers choose to look past this gross negligence and gross incompetence.

Sure, the actions of key players who could have ensured a much better outcome on that tragic day have been criticised. But that's little reason to assume steps have been taken to better protect tourists. There are risks associated with travelling to the Philippines; travel warnings have been issued by other countries, for reasons like "increased terrorism activity".

The four basic demands of the survivors and relatives of victims remain unanswered: an official apology by the Philippine government; compensation; punishment for the officials responsible; and, improved tourist safety. And as they press on with legal action, the least the Hong Kong government can do is keep the travel alert.

The treatment by the Philippine government of the fatal shooting of Taiwanese fisherman Hung Shih-cheng by the Philippine coastguard in May stands in stark contrast to its silence on the hostage crisis. In that case, the Philippines issued a formal apology, agreed to pay compensation to Hung's family, and homicide charges have been recommended - and it took less than three months following the incident for these to happen.

We're not blind to the geopolitics that makes Hong Kong's three-year-old tragedy different from that of the Taiwanese fisherman's. It may seem nonsensical that politics should stand in the way of human lives. Call it nonsensically necessary if you want, but without the victims' demands answered, the travel alert remains. Removing it would not be politically viable.

Alice Wu is a political consultant and a former associate director of the Asia Pacific Media Network at UCLA

Share

18

This article is now closed to comments

amunro
"Over 100,000 Hong Kong tourists visit the Philippines every year, even after August 23, 2010. So, it is clear it hasn't deterred Hongkongers from visiting a country whose authorities have proved - in their handling of the hostage crisis - to be completely inept and incapable of protecting innocent lives in hostage situations. Every year, enough Hongkongers choose to look past this gross negligence and gross incompetence."
You defeat your own argument - it's pointless because it's artificial, so why have it at all? If you took the trouble to read your own newspaper you would also see that compensation has been paid already - the current demand is therefore irrelevant. The government continues to back the calls for whatever because it's the only populist cause they have going for them. I commute to the Philippines monthly (I am there now). Trust me, it doesn't feel a bit like Syria.
SteveFraser
Your figures if based by NSO of PH (National Statistics Office) then it is more likely UNRELIABLE because it was done by filipino govt. It is proven again and again that PH govt cannot be trusted. The rest is self explanatory. If HongKong Chinese ever visit PH, it is mostly for "business" matters and would stay indoors because it is NOT safe to visit Metro Manila and its environs. The beaches like Boracay is overstated. Just look at the backyard, the locals are unable to clean their garbage disposal. However, Amanpulo is a paradise.
According to Dan Brown, Metro Manila is the "gates of h e l l." No PR firm is able to state otherwise will have a bad reputation attached to their names like LIER instead of PhD. I am pretty sure PH has its own limited beauty but it is the people who voted for their corrupt govt officials that lead PH to go backwards beyond imaginable since Mr. Macapagal in 1960's. Sad part is filipinos are totally helpless and would rather leave for greener pastures in the USA, Australia, UK, Canada, and Europe or be a domestic maids in HongKong, ShangHai, BeiJing, Bangkok, TaiPei, Singapore and Middle East as both documented and undocumented alien, thus being a second class citizen.
Think about this, most poor and poverty driven countries are mostly composed of "religious" fanatics locals and use organize religious groups to control its govt, thus improvement is put on halt. Corruption in PH is from Vice Pres to the lowest barangays. No exception
chaz_hen
H E L L...keep the black flag up FOREVER... it'll just further reinforce the utter useless stupidity of HK's government "leaders" as HKers continue to go to the Philippines for comfortable and reasonably priced vacations.
SteveFraser
If HK'ers still want to visit PH, it means they don't value their life. Why bother to drop by to a country where the new name is called FAILippines?
Urban kid
I strongly agree with the previous comments and totally disagree with Alice Wu. The Hong Kong Government policy is both ridiculous and racist. I am a Hong Kong permanent resident and a frequent traveller to Cebu and I can honestly say that it is a safe place to visit. In no way can the Philippines be compared to Syria, which has a civil war, or Egypt, which has just experienced a coup. Moreover, the Philippine Government has already apologised and has also offered or given compensation to the relatives of the unfortunate victims.
So, Hong Kong, for the sake of international relations let's put this ugly incident behind us. The Government should lift the travel alert which is a distortion of reality! Travel alerts should not indeed be imposed to pander to the whims of politicians.
chanaa
How dumb can this writer be ? One is a criminal offence & the other a govt / military.
In any case, i am ald majority of hkers have common sense & continue to travel to Philippines.
anson
Travel alerts are not in place to pander to the whims of politicians. Imagine if typhoon signals could also be deemed politically required. Travel alerts are to warn us of any dangers that may be present when we travel to another country. If the Philippines is now to remain black then we need another 'real' warning system for Hong Kong people who need to travel there, be it for business or other reasons.
ejmciii
Finally someone who gets it. By the way, have been to Philippines 3 times in the last 2 months. No problems and lots of tourists, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, and HK people.

Pages

Login

SCMP.com Account

or