• Fri
  • Sep 19, 2014
  • Updated: 8:19pm
My Take
PUBLISHED : Thursday, 03 October, 2013, 12:00am
UPDATED : Thursday, 03 October, 2013, 12:54am

Rankings belie the real purpose of universities: to educate

Local university chiefs endlessly fret over their institutions' rankings by foreign media. Worse, they worry about becoming less competitive if rankings slip a notch or two relative to say, mainland universities, as if they are fierce competitors out to clean up the city's young talent pool. In doing so, they are talking and acting like our chief executive and commerce bureau chiefs.

But wait a minute, universities are not cities or businesses; they are there to educate the young and discover new knowledge which may or may not have immediate commercial value. Universities serve a completely different purpose in society. So let's remember that and forget about the latest rankings or business fads. Yes, businesses should provide more funding but let's not turn our universities into their extra research arms and our professors into their glorified employees like they do now in many leading US universities.

The latest to whine about that is Professor Tony Chan Fan-cheong, the head of the University of Science and Technology. I know, every time a university chief or the Science Park CEO warns ad nauseam about Hong Kong losing its competitive edge, we report it like it's "Very Serious News". Well, it's not. Neither are university rankings. Yes, it's good advertising or bad press depending whether you get a good or bad ranking. But most of these surveys are meaningless. They are not done for any real motive to find great schools, rather because it's an easy way to attract readers who are parents, as well as advertisers and sponsors.

And that is just part of our obsession with competitiveness that is most worrying. Referring to the likes of Peking University and Tsinghua University, Professor Chan said they are working hard to raise standards. "They have global ambition and great students," he said. "That's the competition we're up against. We have to keep running to stay in place."

Well, go to local campuses today and you will find half the students speaking Putonghua.

In a letter written shortly before he died, Gustave Flaubert wrote: "I have always tried to live in an ivory tower; but a tide of merde is beating at its walls, threatening to undermine it." Buried in merde is a widespread idea to run universities like a competitive business.

Share

For unlimited access to:

SCMP.com SCMP Tablet Edition SCMP Mobile Edition 10-year news archive
 
 

 

17

This article is now closed to comments

mercedes2233
Have you actually been in university campuses? They are certainly not thronged by Putonghua speakers! So you can relax about this.
johnyuan
Reading the last paragraph of today’s My Take is like for me a Déjà vu. Just yesterday I responded to a circular letter with a text, writer unspecified, instructing how to behave when one gets to be 55 to 77 which ascribed as one’s golden age:
To be true you is very difficult for most people especially for those who are brought up in a Chinese culture. Not to be yourself as you aged is even more uncalled for. Living truthfully is liberation that each day is a celebration making useful to others with our experiences and insights until the end of our life. I am who I ever was and am to the best I can.
sudo rm -f cy
Indeed, the main reason our universities are ranked so high is the unhealthy amount of "international" (i.e. Chinese) students we accept, which is frankly not the best metric to use. And the the truth is they'll keep coming even if our education system is complete ****, because no one is going to trust an academic degree from the People's Republic of Cheating. Which, by the way, is the actual title of a Pearl Report episode on academic fraud.
mercedes2233
I trust you speak from knowledge and not prejudice? Do you know how universities are ranked, and what ratio 'internationalism' takes? I don't, so please advise.
sudo rm -f cy
****www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/world-university-rankings/2013-14/world-ranking/methodology
"International outlook" is worth 7.5%. Not too much, but the one factor that's the easiest to "improve" on. I trust other surveys are similar.
mercedes2233
So, your statement that " the main reason our universities are ranked so high is the unhealthy amount of "international" (i.e. Chinese) students we accept" is NOT correct. I thought not. Surely more factors are taken into consideration than just international outlook.
MOSNT
The unhealthy sound of prejudice!

Pages

 
 
 
 
 

Login

SCMP.com Account

or